Actually, at one time the Earth was rather smooth... when it was molten.You really have no evidence that the earth was not at one time rather smooth. You have only conjecture and no actual scientific first hand observation.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Actually, at one time the Earth was rather smooth... when it was molten.You really have no evidence that the earth was not at one time rather smooth. You have only conjecture and no actual scientific first hand observation.
THE FALL and THE FLOOD changed the earth's surface... GOD may have designed sinless man to travel the universe, but the FALL would have precluded Adam from doing such things.
What a very strange thing to do. Almost as if he wanted his revelation to be indistinguishable from the accumulated speculations of hundreds of generations of fallible humans.
But 'lining up' is the last thing it does. Christians are constantly having to come up with contrived explanations of why this or that stern OT injunction is no longer in force. As I said, uncannily as though it were entirely the product of humans codifying the temporary mores of their particular time and place.
This is abysmal. The structure of science rests wholly on hypotheses and their testing: it is not just the collection and cataloguing of 'absolute facts', whatever you think they are. Evolution is tested all the time: it could in principle be falsified every time, for example, a new fossil bed is uncovered. Its resilience in the face of all this testing make it, as others have pointed out, as much a fact as gravitation.
So was there water on the earth before the flood?
Actually, at one time the Earth was rather smooth... when it was molten.
What a very telling statement from a Creationist.
Yes, perhaps. Alternatively, perhaps this is a comforting nostrum to console those who have no reason-based riposte.GOD separates the wheat from the chaff. Perhaps this is one of the ways HE accomplishes HIS will.
Though these considerations always fall sort of evaluating any evidence that runs counter to their preconceived ideas.Christians are willing to provide considerations that might provide a searcher of truth some food for reevaluation of one's commitments.
Y-e-s, of course. It makes complete sense that the person you've offended loves you so much he'll beget a son then kill him to make amends.GOD sent JESUS to provide the final sacrafice, and while there are physical and mental prices to pay for ignoring GOD's tenets. One can still gain eternal salvation by trusting in GOD's sacrafice for one's eternal security.
On the contrary.Evolutionists do not always have tests to verify all their opinions.
So who determinds what exactly constitutes "overwhelming" evidence? What maybe overwhelming to one might just be something to ignore by another?
What a very telling statement from a Creationist.
Evolutionists seem to point their finger at Creationists all the time, and yet they do the very same and call it scientific affirmation.
I believe it rained and there was a flood. I don't know how anyone back at the time could have verified the whole world was covered with water. To them, the world was covered. I don't think they intentionally lied.The vast majority of experts, including some Christian experts, believe that a global flood did not occur, that the earth is old, and that if a God exists, he has used evolution to create life slowly over time. Do you disagree with any of those positions?
AgreeI think the 6 day creation story was not literal.
To be unbiased and have an open mindWhat standards do you recommend for evaluating worldviews?
Do you believe that you would have become a Christian during any time period, and no matter where you lived, assuming that you had read the Bible?
"Some things in the Bible have been proven, like the star of Bethlehem."
Oh really?
I've followed astronomy very closely for over 30 years and have never heard anyone say "they knew what caused the star of Bethlehem". I've heard a lot of people postulate as to what it might have been but have never heard anyone say "this is what it was". I've heard of planet alignments, supernova, comets etc as a possible explanation. But have never heard/read whatever someone say for sure that they have found a natural explaination for it.
So Please if you would share a link to the site where you found that information!
Agnostic75 said:Do you believe that you would have become a Christian during any time period, and no matter where you lived, assuming that you had read the Bible?
Reverend Rick said:No, I believe most religions are handed down. Remember people, I said most.
OK so what? I've seen this before, but it's doesn't saw, they don't say, "this is it and that is what they saw". It only describes what are possible events of the time. where does it say "here it is we can confirm what they saw". Nothing 100%.