Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I see that happening with both parties.I thought it would be a cakewalk for Dems with the abortion crackdown but the border issue is going to hurt them I think.
Good thing basements are generally concrete!Friend sent me this meme.
View attachment 88315
I don't agree that a "good place to start" is ageism. For the same reason I don't agree that a "good place to start" is sexism, racism, or any other type of category-based discrimination.
I'm just going to post this... again:
Ageism is one of the last socially acceptable prejudices. Psychologists are working to change that
Psychologists are examining the age discrimination that pervades American culture and helping people to reimagine healthier relationships with their older selves.www.apa.org
Is that judgment due to your medical expertise?I can not see either of them surviving a full term.
Biden isn't a friend to the UK and Europe? Based on what evidence?However neither is a friend of the UK or Europe come to that.
I thought about the confusion between Mexico and Egypt and realized these are two nations south of a border where there is a humanitarian crisis going on, and which both need immediate attention and solutions. Biden is in the middle of working for solutions at both of these borders and I can see how someone working to solve serious problems might make a mistake when asked about one or the other.Your turn. List all of Biden's equivalent "lack of mental cognitive." He confused the presidents of Mexico and Egypt, which is disconcerting, but neither name (or face) is well-known. Trump confuses Biden with Obama and Pelosi with Haley - four very well-known names and faces.
There's your "lack of mental cognitive." Trump's brain is mush, whereas Biden is leading the free world.
You didn't read the article, did you?Having age limits on a job that requires a significant amount of energy and cognitive capacity is not "discrimination," it's just common sense. I assume you don't think children should be allowed to be president, correct? Does that make you an ageist? You're already advocating for discrimination by proposing a civics test or arbitrary job description anyway which is I said already is difficult to implement and likely to result in actual, unjust discrimination. At least age is a demonstrable indicator of ability.
He'd make a better runner up tooJimmy Carter will be 100 this year.
You take your commitment against ageism really seriously.He'd make a better runner up too
What can I say, Carter has more integrity than either of the 2 clowns running right now.You take your commitment against ageism really seriously.
Is that judgment due to your medical expertise?
Jimmy Carter will be 100 this year.
Biden isn't a friend to the UK and Europe? Based on what evidence?
I asked you for evidence before and you only offered more baseless opinions. Do you not know what evidence means?
I agree that there should be other qualifications for being president in theory, but that's where things get difficult. Who sets those qualifications--are they voted on or does a single person or group of people decide them? If they are voted on, do they change whenever public opinion changes? If they're set by a group, how do we know that the group is not acting in it's own self interest, and does it have the right to change the requirements? Who writes these civics tests and job qualifications and how do we demonstrate that they are not biased to exclude specific individuals from holding office? Additional requirements are a good idea in theory but are difficult to implement. Age is an easy one. We know for a fact that on average, 80 year olds are less cognitively and physically qualified than the average 40 year old. So age restrictions are a good place to start, and we can build from there.
While age limits for certain roles can be grounded in practical considerations like energy and cognitive capacity, it's essential to balance these concerns with fairness. Proposing a civics test or specific job requirements aims to ensure competence rather than discriminate unjustly. Striking the right balance between experience and capability is crucial, acknowledging that age alone might not be the sole indicator of ability. It's a nuanced conversation, and exploring alternative ways to assess fitness for roles can contribute to more inclusive practices without compromising essential qualifications.Having age limits on a job that requires a significant amount of energy and cognitive capacity is not "discrimination," it's just common sense. I assume you don't think children should be allowed to be president, correct? Does that make you an ageist? You're already advocating for discrimination by proposing a civics test or arbitrary job description anyway which is I said already is difficult to implement and likely to result in actual, unjust discrimination. At least age is a demonstrable indicator of ability.
That's an excellent observation.I thought about the confusion between Mexico and Egypt and realized these are two nations south of a border where there is a humanitarian crisis going on, and which both need immediate attention and solutions. Biden is in the middle of working for solutions at both of these borders and I can see how someone working to solve serious problems might make a mistake when asked about one or the other.
Eighty-nine? You're clearly too old to have observations that warrant serious consideration.Bidens frailty is clear for everyone to see . I am 89 and am steadier than he is. When he is questioned he often looks entirely vacant and takes time to gather his thoughts.. his actions over trade and energy show his attitude to the UK and Europe.. he might live to 100 but not in a fit state to govern.
That is a different situation. No one was calling for her to step down because she was suffering mental decline due to age. I don't remember anyone claiming that. On the contrary, her judgement, her insight, her reasoning was as sharp as anyone who has ever been on the court. Different situation.I have a question—which follows from the thread topic—on which I'm interested to read others' perspectives: when some people called for Ruth Bader Ginsburg to step down during Obama's presidency due to her advanced age and increased likelihood of passing away during a Republican president's term if she didn't step down during Obama's, were they being ageist or otherwise unreasonable? Why or why not?
I have a question—which follows from the thread topic—on which I'm interested to read others' perspectives: when some people called for Ruth Bader Ginsburg to step down during Obama's presidency due to her advanced age and increased likelihood of passing away during a Republican president's term if she didn't step down during Obama's, were they being ageist or otherwise unreasonable? Why or why not?
That is a different situation. No one was calling for her to step down because she was suffering mental decline due to age. I don't remember anyone claiming that. On the contrary, her judgement, her insight, her reasoning was as sharp as anyone who has ever been on the court.
Different situation.
Biden will stat the course and lose.Putin and Trump now try and change the story to Putin would like Biden to win.Not Putins poodle Trump.from: Overwhelming majority of Americans think Biden is too old for another term: POLL.
"According to the poll, conducted using Ipsos' Knowledge Panel, 86% of Americans think Biden, 81, is too old to serve another term as president. That figure includes 59% of Americans who think both he and former President Donald Trump, the Republican front-runner, are too old and 27% who think only Biden is too old."
So given the above who are the Democrats going to replace him with? Or are they still going to let him run and lose?
Do you mean RBG?I'm beginning to believe that the flowering of "...ism" and "...ist" terms are the semantic bane of our age.
- Those who called for RGB to retire did so entirely because of her age. That is clearly ageism if (and only if) one allows the term to be used for those situations where a person's age is a compelling consideration. I prefer to reserve the term for those cases where that is not the case.
- Similarly, different-situationism (aka de minimus observationism or DMO) is best used sparingly.