• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

9/11 was an inside job

Spiderman

Veteran Member
Just kidding. I don't believe that, but I've heard it from so many people. Does anyone here think it was an inside job?
 

Kemosloby

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
Yes, for several reason. WTC building 7 not hit by an airplane but imploded. And molten steel in the debris which could not have been caused by the fires we saw. Also the consequences of perpetual war in the middle east that followed as a motive.

 

Lyndon

"Peace is the answer" quote: GOD, 2014
Premium Member
No one has ever come up with any explanation for the collapse of building 7 other than explosives, nothing else could have brought the building down the way it collapsed, note in the video the top of the building starts collapsing first, a top that was not on fire and had no reason to collapse other than controlled demolition.
 

Father Heathen

Veteran Member
No one has ever come up with any explanation for the collapse of building 7 other than explosives, nothing else could have brought the building down the way it collapsed, note in the video the top of the building starts collapsing first, a top that was not on fire and had no reason to collapse other than controlled demolition.

Sigh...

World Trade Center 7 Report Puts 9/11 Conspiracy Theory to Rest

As I've said, kooky spooky conspiracy theories = debunked.
 

Nous

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
Just kidding. I don't believe that, but I've heard it from so many people. Does anyone here think it was an inside job?
Conclusions about the events of 9/11 should be deduced from the evidence--just like conclusions regarding any other crime should be. I am unaware of any evidence by which to conclude a proposition about those events having perpetrators that are "inside" or "outside". Who's "inside" and who's "outside"? I feel sure no one can coherently define what such adjectives mean.

However, there is a good deal of evidence pertaining to the events of 9/11, such as documented in the Harrit et al. paper, Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe. The following is from the Conclusions section of the paper (read carefully):

We have discovered distinctive red/gray chips in significant numbers in dust associated with the World Trade Center destruction. We have applied SEM/XEDS and other methods to characterize the small- scale structure and chemical signature of these chips, especially of their red component. The red material is most interesting and has the following characteristics:

1. It is composed of aluminum, iron, oxygen, silicon and carbon. Lesser amounts of other potentially reactive elements are sometimes present, such as potassium, sulfur, lead, barium and copper.

2. The primary elements (Al, Fe, O, Si, C) are typically all present in particles at the scale of tens to hundreds of nanometers, and detailed XEDS mapping shows intimate mixing.

3. On treatment with methyl ethyl ketone solvent, some segregation of components occurred. Elemental aluminum became sufficiently concentrated to be clearly identified in the pre-ignition material.

4. Iron oxide appears in faceted grains roughly 100 nm across whereas the aluminum appears in thin platelike structures. The small size of the iron oxide particles qualifies the material to be characterized as nanothermite or super-thermite.

5. Analysis shows that iron and oxygen are present in a ratio consistent with Fe2O3. The red material in all four WTC dust samples was similar in this way. Iron oxide was found in the pre-ignition material whereas elemental iron was not.

6. From the presence of elemental aluminum and iron oxide in the red material, we conclude that it contains the ingredients of thermite.

7. As measured using DSC, the material ignites and reacts vigorously at a temperature of approximately 430 °C, with a rather narrow exotherm, matching fairly closely an independent observation on a known super-thermite sample. The low temperature of ignition and the presence of iron oxide grains less than 120 nm show that the material is not conventional thermite (which ignites at temperatures above 900 °C) but very likely a form of super-thermite.

8. After igniting several red/gray chips in a DSC run to 700 °C, we found numerous iron-rich spheres and spheroids in the residue, indicating that a very high temperature reaction had occurred, since the iron-rich product clearly must have been molten to form these shapes. In several spheres, elemental iron was verified since the iron content significantly exceeded the oxygen content. We conclude that a high-temperature reduction-oxidation reaction has occurred in the heated chips, namely, the thermite reaction.

9. The spheroids produced by the DSC tests and by the flame test have an XEDS signature (Al, Fe, O, Si, C) which is depleted in carbon and aluminum relative to the original red material. This chemical signature strikingly matches the chemical signature of the spheroids produced by igniting commercial thermite, and also matches the signatures of many of the microspheres found in the WTC dust [5].

10. The carbon content of the red material indicates that an organic substance is present. This would be expected for super-thermite formulations in order to produce high gas pressures upon ignition and thus make them explosive. The nature of the organic material in these chips merits further exploration. We note that it is likely also an energetic material, in that the total energy release sometimes observed in DSC tests exceeds the theoretical maximum energy of the classic thermite reaction.

Based on these observations, we conclude that the red layer of the red/gray chips we have discovered in the WTC dust is active, unreacted thermitic material, incorporating nanotechnology, and is a highly energetic pyrotechnic or explosive material.
I haven't known anyone account for the findings except as evidence of unreacted nanothermitic material.

There is also definitive evidence of temperatures in the burning WTC buildings much higher than are produced by burning office materials. For instance:

High Temperatures, Persistent Heat & 'Molten Steel' at WTC Site Contradict Official Story

Extremely high temperatures were evident before and during the destruction of the World Trade Center Twin Towers and at Ground Zero. Seven minutes before the destruction of the South Tower, a flow of molten metal appeared, accompanied by several smaller flows, as documented by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). The material’s glowing color showed that its temperature was close to “white hot” at the very beginning of the flow and “yellow-orange” further down. Iron-rich spheres in the WTC dust are additional proof of temperatures above the melting point of iron. Pyroclastic-like, rapidly expanding dust clouds after the destruction of the Towers can also be explained only by the expansion of hot gases.

The high-temperature phenomena at Ground Zero are documented by various sources:

Bechtel engineers, responsible for safety at Ground Zero, wrote in the Journal of the American Society of Safety Engineers: “The debris pile at Ground Zero was always tremendously hot. Thermal measurements taken by helicopter each day showed underground temperatures ranging from 400ºF to more than 2,800ºF.”

The fact that high-temperature phenomena were an important issue at Ground Zero is underscored by the large number of thermal images acquired: images by SPOT, MTI, AVIRIS/NASA, "Twin Otter"/U.S. Army, and at least 25 images by EarthData, taken between Sept. 16 and Oct. 25. In addition, temperature measurements by helicopter were taken each day, and the firefighters used onsite sensors too.

Many witnesses, including rescue personnel and firefighters working on the piles, described the phenomenon of “molten steel.” Terms used in witness statements are, for example, “molten steel,” beams “dripping from molten steel,” “molten steel … like you’re in a foundry. Like lava, from a volcano.” A photograph taken on September 27 by a Ground Zero worker shows an excavating machine lifting debris from the WTC wreckage dripping yellow/orange molten metal.

WTC clean-up workers and 9/11 artifacts architect Bart Voorsanger, in the PBS video “Relics from the Rubble,” described what must have been several tons of “fused element of steel ... molten steel and concrete and all of these things …all fused by the heat,” weighing several tons each. These foreign objects came to be known as “meteorites.”

[. . .]

FEMA documents in their Appendix C of its May 2002 WTC Building Performance Assessment Team study, for sample 1, “evidence of a severe high temperature corrosion attack on the steel, including oxidation and sulfidation with subsequent intergranular melting.” A “sulfur-rich liquid” containing “primarily iron, oxygen, and sulfur” “penetrated” into the steel.

The extremely high temperatures contradict the official story. Office and hydrocarbon fires burning in open air (~500° to 1,500° F) cannot reach temperatures in the range that iron or structural steel melts (2,700° F). This was even acknowledged by NIST’s Co-Project Leader, John Gross . . .​

But as far as I know, there is very little information, much less evidence, by which to conclude who may have done anything illegal.
 

Lyndon

"Peace is the answer" quote: GOD, 2014
Premium Member
Heathen, Your genius cover up article doesn't even have a theory for how the fires started, who set them etc?????
 

Father Heathen

Veteran Member
Heathen, Your genius cover up article doesn't even have a theory for how the fires started, who set them etc?????

So not only did they get what would require tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands, of co-conspirators to collaborate on such an enormously convoluted scheme, but every single one involved has managed to keep quiet about it? That's pretty damn impressive.
 

Lyndon

"Peace is the answer" quote: GOD, 2014
Premium Member
Most people in the military know about the conspiracy, at least that's what soldiers have told me.
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
So not only did they get what would require tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands, of co-conspirators to collaborate on such an enormously convoluted scheme, but every single one involved has managed to keep quiet about it? That's pretty damn impressive.
Precisely why I don't think it's any inside job.
 
Top