I liked the joke.Well, there's still the issue of my jokes being funny or not. So I might still be tedious and boring.
People who didn't are sticks in the mud.
But at least we can make jokes about them!
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I liked the joke.Well, there's still the issue of my jokes being funny or not. So I might still be tedious and boring.
Who has claimed it's a coincidence?i guess we can call the believers coincidence theorists when it comes to building 7, the biggest coincidence in history.
The fire started from falling debris from the Towers.You still haven't explained how the fire started?? another big coinkidink
Burning debris from the other buildings.You still haven't explained how the fire started?? another big coinkidink
Since you can't do it without them noticing, all the people who worked in that building must be in on the conspiracy, of course.Burning debris from the other buildings.
You still haven't explained how to rig a building for demolition right under the occupants' noses.
Aye, at least those who gave their lives to protect the cover won't snitch.Since you can't do it without them noticing, all the people who worked in that building must be in on the conspiracy, of course.
No one has ever offered an explanation of how a fully occupied building could be rigged
with demolition explosives. Have you ever seen how it's done? There are numerous access
openings to structural elements...wires all over the place...explosives placed.....crews working
for many days to rig up the system. None of the tenants noticed they were to be subject to
demolition? The maintenance workers & landlord were OK with it all?
This is utterly ridiculous.
A big reason I point this out is that conspiracy theorists will inundate us with walls of technical
text which suggest something extremely complicated, mysterious, & damning going on. This
is impossible to debunk because links to sources are often lacking, the conspiracists typically
lack an engineering/metallurgical background, & it's a whack-a-mole kind of pseudo-analysis.
But I point out things accessible to all. Anyone can imagine being a tenant or worker in the
building. Such a massive demolition project would be noticeable. Tenants would complain.
Tenants always complain.
An on-line store selling conspiracy mugs, T-shirts & bumper stickrers?I am guessing you never looked at www.ae911truth.org
I think a few conspiracists had an engineering and architecture background.
Which is exactly why I voted for Jill Stein, knowing that in rural Kansas my vote would mean next to nothing. Trump was going to win the state, and I would have been damned before throwing my lot in with Hilliary.To pick the lesser of 2 evils doesn't change the fact that one still voted for evil.
Have they addressed my queries about how tenants tolerated demolition rigging?
I notice that they revamped their site. You used to be able to easily get to that petition they describe and see just how many of their "architects and engineers" were landscape architects, computer engineers, and other disciplines that aren't relevant to the question of what happened on 9/11.I am guessing you never looked at www.ae911truth.org
I think a few conspiracists had an engineering and architecture background.
I'd have voted for Gary Johnson if MI were a foregone result as usual.Which is exactly why I voted for Jill Stein, knowing that in rural Kansas my vote would mean next to nothing. Trump was going to win the state, and I would have been damned before throwing my lot in with Hilliary.
Of course!Maybe they snuck in during the night?
Of course!
And the nite janitors were in on the plot too.
Well, a youtube video.