• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

A personal relationship with God?

Adonis65

Active Member
well lets look at that passage...


it seems as though you are insinuating one is not sincere in their efforts when seeking wisdom elsewhere other than in god...

yes, you are correct that this conversation is spiraling into weirdness because the qualifying statement is indeed strange...what else do you expect...:shrug:

On the contrary; the passage states "If any of you lack wisdom". Do you feel that you lack wisdom? If you felt that you did not lack wisdom when you read my comment, then you would have simply smiled in confidence, and moved on to the next post. But that's not what you did. For some reason you took offense to the scripture, and decided to inform me of your displeasure. The weirdness lies in your growing conflict with James 1:5.

So I will ask again; do you, waitasec, lack wisdom? :confused:
 
Last edited:

waitasec

Veteran Member
On the contrary; the passage states "If any of you lack wisdom". Do you feel that you lack wisdom? If you felt that you did not lack wisdom when you read my comment, then you would have simply smiled in confidence, and moved on to the next post.
of course i do...i'm not a know it all...living life is a constant state of progress...



But that's not what you did. For some reason you took offense to the scripture, and decided to inform me of your displeasure. The weirdness lies in your growing conflict with James 1:5.

So I will ask again; do you, waitasec, lack wisdom? :confused:

yes. do you?
 
Last edited:

waitasec

Veteran Member
good point waitasec

the scripture was written to practicing and faithful christians, so it applies to those who already have a relationship with God

Those who dont already have such a relationship are not going to be given wisdom simply by asking a diety who they have not come to know. And no one comes to know him intimately until he has drawn them.
i understand that.
the psalmists says..."the fool says there is no god" this sets up the underlying notion that if one does not have a personal relationship with god one is foolish. i take issue with that...only because this would be the platform believers stand on when they appoint themselves as the moral police and infringe on the inalienable rights of others...it has happened throughout history...see what i mean?
 

9-10ths_Penguin

1/10 Subway Stalinist
Premium Member
You're talking about a cpl of specific religion here and about specific factions within each. IMO, as long as you equate belief in God with religion and religion with the Judao/Christian religions, and equate those religions with the hell and brimstone variety exclusively, ...

Put it this way: someone whose vision is that narrow isn't going to be able to see mundane reality all that clearly, let alone any thing outside of the mundane.
In my experience, the phrase "personal relationship with God" is almost exclusively used by Evangelical Protestants who have decided (for reasons I'm not completely clear on) that they don't like to describe their religion as "religion".

Those that use the language of having a personal relationship with god are often evangelical Christians.

It seems to me that the tendency is to interpret hunches, or gut feelings, or emotions, or one's own conscience, or coincidences, as all being god's form of communication with them.
I think there's something else as well: religious worship only implies that the believer considers God to be important, but a "personal relationship with God" implies not only that the believer considers God important, but that God considers the believer important as well.

IOW, I think there's a fair bit of self-aggrandization going on in describing one's religion as a "personal relationship with God".

If someone is saying "Prove to me that there's such a thing as light, then I'll open my eyes".
IMO, it's more like saying "I'm not going to look down to see whether my laces are untied, because I'm not even wearing shoes."

It seems to me that a lot of the methods that purport to provide experiential verification of God (e.g. "opening your heart to Jesus and he will answer you" and the like) are about creating a situation of vulnerability and then taking advantage of it. Look at the language that was used in the thread already about setting aside logic in favour of "sincerity"; that sort of approach raises big red flags for me.

Just as I'd be worried that someone might take advantage of me looking down at my shoelaces to do something nasty to me, I worry that these sorts of approaches to a "personal relationship" might put me in a bad position as well.
 

Quagmire

Imaginary talking monkey
Staff member
Premium Member
In my experience, the phrase "personal relationship with God" is almost exclusively used by Evangelical Protestants who have decided (for reasons I'm not completely clear on) that they don't like to describe their religion as "religion".

Well, now you have a different experience.

IMO, it's more like saying "I'm not going to look down to see whether my laces are untied, because I'm not even wearing shoes."

Then again, a lot of people are afraid to look down because they don't want to see what shoes they are wearing (or what they're standing in).

It seems to me that a lot of the methods that purport to provide experiential verification of God (e.g. "opening your heart to Jesus and he will answer you" and the like) are about creating a situation of vulnerability and then taking advantage of it.

Gee, maybe people should avoid those methods then.

Look at the language that was used in the thread already about setting aside logic in favour of "sincerity"; that sort of approach raises big red flags for me.

Maybe you should go back and call who ever said that on it. I'm sure they'll be able to explain what they meant better than I would.

Just as I'd be worried that someone might take advantage of me looking down at my shoelaces to do something nasty to me, I worry that these sorts of approaches to a "personal relationship" might put me in a bad position as well.

Sounds like you don't have a lot of faith in yourself.
 
Last edited:

Pegg

Jehovah our God is One
i understand that.
the psalmists says..."the fool says there is no god" this sets up the underlying notion that if one does not have a personal relationship with god one is foolish. i take issue with that...only because this would be the platform believers stand on when they appoint themselves as the moral police and infringe on the inalienable rights of others...it has happened throughout history...see what i mean?

well you get that either way. Those who dont believe in God think the believers are the fools, so we are all as bad as each other :D
 

jelly

Active Member
well you get that either way. Those who dont believe in God think the believers are the fools, so we are all as bad as each other :D
believers: get everybody in a room, make them stand, make them sit, make them sing, then pass around a bag so people can put money in it, make them stand, make them sit, then open the doors so they can get out without anyone saying "thanks for the cash!".
non-believers: go to a house party, bring your own beer and food, eat, drink, and be merry, thank the host, leave.
there are some variations on which group has liquor and food and the quantity of the liquor and food.
yeah the foolishness is rampant.
 

Matthew78

aspiring biblical scholar
did you ever undertake a study of the bible?

Indeed, I have! In fact, studying the Bible with the aid of the writings of former clergy is what led me to the happy conclusion that the Bible contained flaws and wasn't inspired by a higher being. I still find the Bible extremely fascinating to read for the insights it offers about the history, culture, and religious beliefs of the ancient Hebrews and the earliest Christians.

All the information that God wants us to know is in there and its there to enable us to form a relationship with God. the first and most important thing is that you know who you are talking to....God has a personal name, do you know that name and where it is located in the bible?

I believed this, too. I just think differently these days. We can disagree (I prefer respectfully) over whether or not I'm misguided in my thinking but I hold different beliefs these days. As for God having a personal name, are you referring to YHWH?

accurate knowledge stimulates faith, and faith gets Gods attention. Hebrews 11:6 says " Moreover, without faith it is impossible to please [him] well, for he that approaches God must believe that he is and that he becomes the rewarder of those earnestly seeking him"
But of course, you dont get real faith without real knowledge first. Dont give up until you've exhausted all avenues!

I did exhaust what I felt were the reasonable avenues! I don't think there was really anything left me to do!
 

Pegg

Jehovah our God is One
Indeed, I have! In fact, studying the Bible with the aid of the writings of former clergy is what led me to the happy conclusion that the Bible contained flaws and wasn't inspired by a higher being. I still find the Bible extremely fascinating to read for the insights it offers about the history, culture, and religious beliefs of the ancient Hebrews and the earliest Christians.

it doesnt surprise me that the writings of the clergy turned you off the bible. Their own doctrines contradict what the bible says, so if you are learning their doctrines, then nothing in the bible will make any sense.

I agree the bible is a great source of history.... its also a great source of information about the future though. If you doubt the bibles inspiration, then i would suggest a study of its many prophecies and a comparison to the historical events that those prophecies foretold...its inspiration will become apparent to you.


I believed this, too. I just think differently these days. We can disagree (I prefer respectfully) over whether or not I'm misguided in my thinking but I hold different beliefs these days. As for God having a personal name, are you referring to YHWH?

thats fair enough... we need to see evidence these days. its not enough to sit back and be told, we need to be fully convinced ourselves. So i dont think you are misguided, just perhaps you haven't seen convincing proof yet.

And Yes, i do mean the name of God YHWH.... or by its most common english translation 'Jehovah'
Its an important name... according to scripture we need to call on Gods name in order to come to know him. If we dont know that name, then how can we call on him?

I did exhaust what I felt were the reasonable avenues! I don't think there was really anything left me to do!

well, so long as you are happy with your decision, thats all that is required. But if in the future your view changes, you could try studying the bible with those of us who call on the name of YHWH. The offer is always there. :angel2:
 

ninerbuff

godless wonder
I agree the bible is a great source of history.... its also a great source of information about the future though. If you doubt the bibles inspiration, then i would suggest a study of its many prophecies and a comparison to the historical events that those prophecies foretold...its inspiration will become apparent to you.
This is laughable. Prophecies being foretold? Lol, the bible was written well after these so called "prophecies" so it's EASY to write stories to try to make it seem as if they came true.
 

waitasec

Veteran Member
well you get that either way. Those who dont believe in God think the believers are the fools, so we are all as bad as each other :D

lets talk about what is happening today, when does the "fool" of the world impose their beliefs on those who believe in god?
 

Matthew78

aspiring biblical scholar
it doesnt surprise me that the writings of the clergy turned you off the bible. Their own doctrines contradict what the bible says, so if you are learning their doctrines, then nothing in the bible will make any sense.

I'm afraid you misunderstand my previous post. I typed in my previous post that it was the writings of former clergy that got me to rethink my beliefs. Former clergy meaning former Christians. Their writings helped convinced me that the Bible contains discrepancies and errors. I just didn't just take their words for it, I did my own study and concluded that, although sometimes they're wrong, they're also often right.

I agree the bible is a great source of history.... its also a great source of information about the future though.

I disagree.

If you doubt the bibles inspiration, then i would suggest a study of its many prophecies and a comparison to the historical events that those prophecies foretold...its inspiration will become apparent to you.

You're assuming I haven't done that. I'm sorry to disappoint you but I have. I have come to the conclusion that most Bible prophecies are failures. If you would like, we can start a thread on Bible prophecies and discuss them. I can explain why I think they're failures and you can explain why you think my reasoning is flawed.

thats fair enough... we need to see evidence these days. its not enough to sit back and be told, we need to be fully convinced ourselves. So i dont think you are misguided, just perhaps you haven't seen convincing proof yet.

I don't think it's likely that I'll ever see convincing proof. It's not because I have any antisupernatural bias either. I have seen, what I take to be, too much proof to the contrary. I'm not shy about discussing this, either.

And Yes, i do mean the name of God YHWH.... or by its most common english translation 'Jehovah'
Its an important name... according to scripture we need to call on Gods name in order to come to know him. If we dont know that name, then how can we call on him?

Well, the first reference to people calling on the name of YHWH is in Genesis. How people calling on his name supposedly knew it was his name is something I don't recall reading about. YHWH reveals his name to Abraham, to Isaac, then to Jacob. God tells Moses, in Exodus, that his name is YHWH.

well, so long as you are happy with your decision, thats all that is required. But if in the future your view changes, you could try studying the bible with those of us who call on the name of YHWH. The offer is always there. :angel2:

I'm very pleased with my decision and I don't see how my view would change in the future. I appreciate the offer but I'm going to have to politely decline it. :)
 

waitasec

Veteran Member
Me too. That's why I encourage people to read James 1:5. ;)

what for, especially if they don't believe in the god of the bible? wouldn't it be presumptuous to think what works for you works for others?
unless of course someone asks...
 
Last edited:

Adonis65

Active Member
what for, especially if they don't believe in the god of the bible? wouldn't it be presumptuous to think what works for you works for others?
unless of course someone asks...

Are you suggesting that no one should ever be allowed to share their knowledge with anyone else? Are you interested in being part of a free society, or a dictatorship?
 
Last edited:

Acim

Revelation all the time
I'm fundamentally confused by this particular notion. God-believers want other people to have a relationship with God, but how is that even possible? Where is God? How do you talk to him? How does he talk back?

Greetings. It is my first day on RF and was compelled to respond to your post. I haven't read other responses, but will after I post this one. My apologies if what I'm saying is "old news" and not contributing much to stimulating discussion. But part of my response, in the way I understand things, is intended for 'me' as much as anyone.

I would admit to having desire for anyone / everyone to have relationship with God. From my perspective, it is impossible not to. Though I recognize not everyone reading this will share that perspective. I would also just stipulate that I strongly believe you will have awareness around that relationship when you are ready, not when someone else deems it is time for you. Put another way, I'm not evangelical about my desire for you to relate to God. Mostly because I think it impossible not to have that relationship and feel quite confident you call "Him" by whatever works for you, and I'm highly compelled to honor that.

God is within. Conceivably, God is also all around. If I were attempting to be specific, God is within consciousness. Not contained there, but within.

Is prayer like leaving a message on an answering machine except God never calls back? It's like someone commissioning forty odd authors to write down everything they want to say to you nearly 2,000 years ago and then just disappearing without a trace. Yet that person still demands that you believe that they love you or else he'll set you on fire forever.

Here is where I would differ from a great many (so called) God believers. I wholeheartedly believe revelation (communication) is progressive, ongoing. In my understanding, God has never stopped talking to us. But (I reckon) many refuse to listen. Having fear they either are listening to false god or, worse, are deemed delusional.

Prayer to me is like leaving a message. In my understanding, it is asking with a (personal) sense of clarity. I believe God knows before we ask. Knows what we are really asking for, before we ask in the way prayer(s) construct. Yet, like most communication with the Divine it is far more about building trust / remembrance in that aspect of Self, then it is in, say testing or trying God's "power." Perhaps there is more to say on this point, but I'll leave it there for now.

The entire relationship would be based on the rather impersonal method of commissioning someone else to write about it rather than direct interaction on a personal level, which is how I conduct my personal relations with other people. I know some believe in signs here and there, but you can make any ambiguous event mean almost anything and it's still impersonal. I mean a single child survives a tsunami and it's called a 'miracle'. Never mind the thousands of people, including other children, that died without a reason because then it's called 'God works in mysterious ways'.

So essentially I'm asking how can I have a personal relationship with God, much less worship him, whenever I've never even met him in person or know whether he even exists?

I'm feeling like there are several ways to respond to this inquiry, and ultimately none will matter (coming from me) if you are entertaining a resistance toward idea of "relating with God." For, I am convinced you have met God, and know God exists. I might put this in terms of saying, you have met God of your understanding, and if you understand yourself as existing, you can understand God existing. So, here in this form of communication, it is more intellectual exercise than the obvious point of "I am."

I operate under idea that it is possible to explain connection with God / existence of God in intellectual way. It isn't always 'easy' to explain this, but I still think it is plausible.

I would suggest that to have the relationship, you be willing to call God by something else. Flying Spaghetti Monster works for me (it really does). But it may not work for you, and the key is to find term that will work for you. Could be "Life" or "Me" or many other possibilities. I think it is just important to see this as starting point - calling God (within) by something that (truly) works for you.

Next step is to acknowledge, in mostly intellectual way, that if God is within (rather than outside, and/or separate), that it is plausible that everything you have ever thought is available (or known) to this inner entity. Thus, this Being likely knows you far far more than you might be willing to give it credit. In fact, I find myself still thinking my Divine Self doesn't fully understand me. Yet, in my more aware moments, this is really hilarious: to think I can hide something from my Self. In my less aware moments, it is, at times, depressing to think of myself as going it alone, since God (or FSM) can't possibly understand what it's like to walk the earth as I do. (It's hell I tell you!)

After these first 2 steps are accepted (in way that works for you, where you're at now), it is just a matter of "building trust." Kinda like all personal relationships, but with caveat of - this one will never ever end. That right there ought to help on the whole trust thing, but alas, in my experience, it takes more than "I'll always be there for you."

I find there are many ways to build the trust. Early on, you might look to build it in ways that are essentially testing the inner Being, hoping you are not delusional, and in the process, receiving honest, I would even say testable, indicators that the communication is truly two way. I find meditation can be ideal for this, but ideally I look to meditate as I go about whatever it is I desire to do here on earth. Or look to be in that zone where life is easy, things are going smoothly (aka grace) and you are able to trust yourself in situations.

That to me is a great start, and in some ways it is most of what I could ever say, while also barely scratching the surface from how I understand it intellectually.

Hope it helps.
:bow:
 

waitasec

Veteran Member
Are you suggesting that no one should ever be allowed to share their knowledge with anyone else?

i said if someone invites you in that is when the opportunity to share your personal experience opens up. you just don't barge into someone's home now do you? or maybe you do...
psst, it's rude to do so, cause you're not respecting the other persons space
Are you interested in being part of a free society, or a dictatorship?

dictatorship is when no one is allowed, ever, even when they're invited...
seems to me the reason for invading someone's personal space is because of the fear of not being invited in...
 
Last edited:

McBell

Unbound
Are you suggesting that no one should ever be allowed to share their knowledge with anyone else? Are you interested in being part of a free society, or a dictatorship?
Wow.
So what was it about the questions that upset you so much that you have to completely avoid the topic and start throwing out non sequiturs?
 

9-10ths_Penguin

1/10 Subway Stalinist
Premium Member
Are you suggesting that no one should ever be allowed to share their knowledge with anyone else? Are you interested in being part of a free society, or a dictatorship?
I've never understood it when people try to invoke free speech while shouting down opposing views.

The right to free speech doesn't include the right to not have your speech challenged by other people's speech, because people who disagree with you have a right to free speech, too.
 
Top