james bond
Well-Known Member
You're welcome. It didn't take much time because I use those sites regularly. For example, some atheists will claim microevolution and macroevolution are creationists terms and somehow not scientific.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
A Very Simple Question For Creationists
- Thread starter Skwim
- Start date
You're welcome. It didn't take much time because I use those sites regularly. For example, some atheists will claim microevolution and macroevolution are creationists terms and somehow not scientific.
james bond
Well-Known Member
Me creationist. You evolutionist. Aren't you suppose to show that it is possible? Ha ha.
Two many very fine coincidences were required for every new species to appear for this non-fundamentalist God believer to put her trust in evolution without design.
There isn't even a word for it all other than creation which means to bring into existence and to bring is a verb. Verbs need subjects. What is the subject, other than God?
All life needs water. The components of water cause an explosion when they are combined.
How much water is there? It all came from an explosion. Didn't it?
When hydrogen and oxygen combine you get water, but what else did Earth get at the combining of them?
How big was it?
There isn't even a word for it all other than creation which means to bring into existence and to bring is a verb. Verbs need subjects. What is the subject, other than God?
All life needs water. The components of water cause an explosion when they are combined.
How much water is there? It all came from an explosion. Didn't it?
When hydrogen and oxygen combine you get water, but what else did Earth get at the combining of them?
How big was it?
The question is; How big was the explosion when water evolved?
Can I call it evolved or are you going to hit me because there isn't a right word for it?
Can I call it evolved or are you going to hit me because there isn't a right word for it?
What is the word for the arrangement of substances into molecules?
Bonus question. How long did it take?
Bonus question. How long did it take?
Jose Fly
Fisker of men
You made the claim, you either support it or you don't. If you don't, then it remains an unsupported claim.
Evolution is to life as what is to non-life?
I realize we are talking about the evolution of LIFE, but for it to ever happen there had to be all the building blocks and WATER.
I need you to explain the building blocks and how they came to be and how water was formed without blowing up all the LAND.
Just look it up for goodness's sake!
How to make water from Hydrogen and Oxygen.
There isn't any book yet about how to make hydrogen and oxygen or nitrogen.....
How to make water from Hydrogen and Oxygen.
There isn't any book yet about how to make hydrogen and oxygen or nitrogen.....
Reggie Miller
Well-Known Member
Yes, I have encountered that before.
The first and most important substance for life is WATER. Where did water come from?
The sky? LOL
james bond
Well-Known Member
Ok, macroevolution remains an unsupported claim. I agree.
Else give me an example of macroevolution.
Reggie Miller
Well-Known Member
Yes, I would like to see this explained in detail as well - scientifically - without guessing or assuming anything. I don't think that is too much to ask from a person who claims to believe it based on scientific evidence alone.
I think that evolution is not an unsupported claim. But what is driving it is very sorely lacking. Also, have we seen people arguing for evolution instead of creation get all hot under the collar whenever someone says, "explain how it started, pretty please!"? They say, "That's not evolution" and sometimes I get the feeling people who say so fancy themselves better thinkers that us believers.
At least it is funny.
At least it is funny.
Jose Fly
Fisker of men
So your position is, no one can say anything about the evolution of any species or trait until they first explain the origin of all the elements in the universe?
Wow. Black or white you are. That is not my position.
I think evolution is being underrated even by people who trust in it.
Look at the human race! OMG look at the Americans! We are FAT. If we took evolution seriously we would not be fat. And we would be more careful about who we have sex with.
Look at the human race! OMG look at the Americans! We are FAT. If we took evolution seriously we would not be fat. And we would be more careful about who we have sex with.
ev·o·lu·tion
ˌevəˈlo͞oSH(ə)n/
noun
the gradual development of something, especially from a simple to a more complex form.
ˌevəˈlo͞oSH(ə)n/
noun
- 1.
the process by which different kinds of living organisms are thought to have developed and diversified from earlier forms during the history of the earth.
the gradual development of something, especially from a simple to a more complex form.