Colt
Well-Known Member
Your opinion about life inventing itself is profoundly worthless.An opinion is worthless if one cannot support it.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Your opinion about life inventing itself is profoundly worthless.An opinion is worthless if one cannot support it.
No it is not. That is what your opinion is. Abiogenesis is well supported by scientific evidence.Your opinion about life inventing itself is profoundly worthless.
Abiogenesis hasn't created life. BTW, mind created the Abiogenesis experiments.No it is not. That is what your opinion is. Abiogenesis is well supported by scientific evidence.
Call me when you get some.
This is all just biased blather. (No offense.)
So what? Now that was a truly a dumb argument. How else are we to learn how life came about?Abiogenesis hasn't created life. BTW, mind created the Abiogenesis experiments.
exactly, whether by natural process or a creation............. there was a start and each team have hypothesisIt appears that you did not understand that post. I was simply stating a fact. You probably believe in some sort of abiogenesis event yourself. I really do not know of any that do not accept one. We do know that there was such an event, even if we do not know how.
Abiogenesis hasn't created life. BTW, mind created the Abiogenesis experiments.
Subd implies that the Abiogenesis experiment proves that life invented itself.What has the Abiogenesis experiments.got to do with the price of fish?
Did I? Where did I do that?Subd implies that the Abiogenesis experiment proves that life invented itself.
You said that Abiogenesis is well supported by scientific evidence.Did I? Where did I do that?
When you do not understand something you should ask questions politely.
Oh that is true. But you made the mistake of using the word "prove". That is not used in the sciences. It is a fact that there is quite a bit of evidence for abiogenesis. There was nothing controversial about that at all. Nor is it controversial to point out that theists cannot seem to find any scientific evidence for their beliefs.You said that Abiogenesis is well supported by scientific evidence.
There is no proof of God either. The belief that life invented itself is also a kind of faith.Oh that is true. But you made the mistake of using the word "prove". That is not used in the sciences. It is a fact that there is quite a bit of evidence for abiogenesis. There was nothing controversial about that at all. Nor is it controversial to point out that theists cannot seem to find any scientific evidence for their beliefs.
craig ventorOh that is true. But you made the mistake of using the word "prove". That is not used in the sciences. It is a fact that there is quite a bit of evidence for abiogenesis. There was nothing controversial about that at all. Nor is it controversial to point out that theists cannot seem to find any scientific evidence for their beliefs.
Subd implies that the Abiogenesis experiment proves that life invented itself.
invented itself............Never heard that angle before.There is no proof of God either. The belief that life invented itself is also a kind of faith.
Because they function without magical intervention. Only a deist could say that the processes were built in to the universe from the start. For a theist, there has to be magic somewhere.Why couldn't big bang, abiogenesis, evolution, etc. have been god's process?
Yes, no proof of God, but then the good news is that at least not all versions have been refuted.There is no proof of God either. The belief that life invented itself is also a kind of faith.
Evolutionary religion, naturally evolving religion is the scaffolding for revealed religion. God concepts develop over time across all cultures.invented itself............Never heard that angle before.
But mankind did INVENT (create) a whole bunch of gods.
Yep, the religious were started by mankind and many evolved over time.Evolutionary religion, naturally evolving religion is the scaffolding for revealed religion. God concepts develop over time across all cultures.
Abiogenesis as the explanation of the origins of life is a theory and nothing more.Yes, no proof of God, but then the good news is that at least not all versions have been refuted.
But accepting abiogenesis is not faith based because there is reliable evidence for it. It may even have passed the legal legal standard of being proven, but scientists have higher standards than that. The work goes on.