• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Abiogenesis

Subduction Zone

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Colt said:
Abiogenesis as the explanation of the origins of life is a theory and nothing more.
Click to expand...
Theories explain facts. But lucky for you it is still in the hypothetical stage. You should be asking yourself "Why can't those dang creation scientists every find any scientific evidence for their beliefs?"

You appear to be jealous because the side that you disagree with has reliable evidence and you have none.
 
L

Little Dragon

Well-Known Member
PureX said:
To claim that "God did it" is EXACTLY as plausible as claiming that the mindless forces of nature did it. In fact, to a lot of people, these would be considered to be the SAME CLAIM.
Click to expand...
Not it isnt. The God claim is untestable.

It's that simple. ;)
 
Colt

Colt

Well-Known Member
Subduction Zone said:
Theories explain facts. But lucky for you it is still in the hypothetical stage. You should be asking yourself "Why can't those dang creation scientists every find any scientific evidence for their beliefs?"

You appear to be jealous because the side that you disagree with has reliable evidence and you have none.
Click to expand...
I already know God and don't need to have proof of his technique of creation via evolution. It's not me who is an atheists that spends sooooo much time on a religious forum criticizing people of faith with snarky comments.

"The mechanistic philosopher professes to reject the idea of a universal and sovereign will, the very sovereign will whose activity in the elaboration of universe laws he so deeply reverences. What unintended homage the mechanist pays the law-Creator when he conceives such laws to be self-acting and self-explanatory"! UB 1955

You seem frustrated that you cant control others? Is that a defect in the self-replicating molecule theory?
 
Subduction Zone

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Colt said:
I already know God and don't need to have proof of his technique of creation via evolution. It's not me who is an atheists that spends sooooo much time on a religious forum criticizing people of faith with snarky comments.

"The mechanistic philosopher professes to reject the idea of a universal and sovereign will, the very sovereign will whose activity in the elaboration of universe laws he so deeply reverences. What unintended homage the mechanist pays the law-Creator when he conceives such laws to be self-acting and self-explanatory"! UB 1955

You seem frustrated that you cant control others? Is that a defect in the self-replicating molecule theory?
Click to expand...
You believe that you know God. That does not mean that you know God. And people like you are wrong much much more often than those that follow the evidence. Knowledge is demonstrable. When it comes to abiogenesis scientists are working on understanding how it happened.

Oh and you quoted from a religious book to defend a religious book. So what? I have a book of Subduction that says that you are wrong. It also says that you would deny being wrong. So I guess that my book is more accurate and my belief in Subductionism is proven to be a fact:rolleyes:

Is this really the best that you could do?
 
Colt

Colt

Well-Known Member
Subduction Zone said:
You believe that you know God. That does not mean that you know God. And people like you are wrong much much more often than those that follow the evidence. Knowledge is demonstrable. When it comes to abiogenesis scientists are working on understanding how it happened.

Oh and you quoted from a religious book to defend a religious book. So what? I have a book of Subduction that says that you are wrong. It also says that you would deny being wrong. So I guess that my book is more accurate and my belief in Subductionism is proven to be a fact:rolleyes:

Is this really the best that you could do?
Click to expand...
Yes, that's it. You have lightning strikes a mud puddle and I have the mind behind the purposive potential within the evolution of life. Mind creating mind.
 
Colt

Colt

Well-Known Member
"Neither should science discount religious experience on grounds of credulity, not so long as it persists in the assumption that man’s intellectual and philosophic endowments emerged from increasingly lesser intelligences the further back they go, finally taking origin in primitive life which was utterly devoid of all thinking and feeling"... UB 1955

micro-organisms-ancient-603x400 (1).png
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top