PureX
Veteran Member
Nope, it really isn't. But I can see that you will not recognize this.Nope. It is a testable hypothesis.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Nope, it really isn't. But I can see that you will not recognize this.Nope. It is a testable hypothesis.
It is a testable hypothesis, because the test would be to, in the lab, create living chemical systems starting with non living chemical interactions and processes. Something that has already begun in bio research facilities using in addition to petri dishes, computer modelling software, across the globe.Nope, it really isn't. But I can see that you will not recognize this.
Oh my! God forbid! Truth lying OUTSIDE THE REALM OF SCIENTIFIC ENQUIREY!!! WHATEVER SHALL WE DO???Wow. If your claim cannot ever be tested, in a test tube or otherwise. Like God magic claims. Then it is simply outside of the realm of scientific inquiry.
Ah, that's the ticket .... we'll just ignore it.Of little interest to me.
Ignore it?Oh my! God forbid! Truth lying OUTSIDE THE REALM OF SCIENTIFIC ENQUIREY!!! WHATEVER SHALL WE DO???
And you do not seem to grasp the fact that math is just another flawed human language used to help us describe what we experience to ourselves and each other. It is not a magic potion for determining truth. Neither is the scientific process.You do not understand how theory works. All scientific theories, are mathematically modeled approximations. The more accurate the prediction, the more reliable the theory. There are no absolutes.
Of course. What else?Ah, that's the ticket .... we'll just ignore it.
What?And you do not seem to grasp the fact that math is just another flawed human language used to help us describe what we experience to ourselves and each other. It is not a magic potion for determining truth. Neither is the scientific process.
Magic potion? That's rich coming from someone eschewing evidence based reasoning.It is not a magic potion for determining truth.
Well, there's philosophy, art, and religion. Psychology, too. We could try those paths of inquiry. Believe it or not, science is not the only means we humans have for investigating the truth of 'what is'.Of course. What else?
And by that logic, Christianity is a corruption of Judaism, as the Torah also warned against false prophets. Also, from the Mormon perspective, their book did add revelations about Jesus; his wife and family, his visit to America, etc. So I ask again, what makes your religion correct, and those that came before or after wrong, other than the fact that's what you were born into?Early Christianity was a corruption of the religion of Jesus from the very start but that was inevitable! Morman's haven't presented any revelation that adds to Jesus. Jesus warned to beware of false prophets.
They only matter when they are applicable. And they are often simply not applicable.What?
Math is an abstract language of symbolic quantification. Without data, no mathematical model can be constructed. The evidence, the data, the measurements, the observations, they are what matters. Jeez.
You would use art to calculate the speed of light would you? Philosophy to determine the mass of a quark? Religion to determine the orbital period of Venus?Well, there's philosophy, art, and religion. Psychology, too. We could try those paths of inquiry. Believe it or not, science is not the only means we humans have for investigating the truth of 'what is'.
What?They only matter when they are applicable. And they are often simply not applicable.
Not going to happen, the scientific method is the only objective means of inquiry, into physical reality. By physical I mean anything that can be measured. Gravity, light, energy, matter, you, me, galaxies, atoms, time, space etc..What I'm trying to get you to acknowledge is that science is not the only means we humans have for investigating and understanding the true nature of existence.
Ah, another 'scientism cult' true believer, then.Not going to happen, the scientific method is the only objective means of inquiry, into physical reality. By physical I mean anything that can be measured. Gravity, you, me, galaxies, atoms, time, space etc..
I am the high priest.Ah, another 'scientism cult' true believer, then.
That's very sciencey...Psychology, too.
Bless you my son. May Dawkins guide you.Ah, another 'scientism cult' true believer, then.
I believe that something’s true. Not everything believed is true. I have surrendered to the pursuit of “truth” rather than using the diversity of beliefs as an excuse for spiritual laziness. Noncommittal is easy!And by that logic, Christianity is a corruption of Judaism, as the Torah also warned against false prophets. Also, from the Mormon perspective, their book did add revelations about Jesus; his wife and family, his visit to America, etc. So I ask again, what makes your religion correct, and those that came before or after wrong, other than the fact that's what you were born into?
Nah, spiritual laziness would be accepting being spoon-fed a prepackaged deal without examining it through an objective and critical lens. It's okay to contrast and compare, weight the logic and evidence, etc. You declared other religions/gods inferior without knowing anything about them. How is that not lazy?I believe that something’s true. Not everything believed is true. I have surrendered to the pursuit of “truth” rather than using the diversity of beliefs as an excuse for spiritual laziness. Noncommittal is easy!
Likewise I don't find any of the religions compelling.I don’t believe a number of claims in the religion that I was born into. I don’t find the story of Mormonism compelling.