• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Abortion for profit advertising - Yes/No?

Kathryn

It was on fire when I laid down on it.
Sorry, Mestemia - I'm not following you AT ALL regarding the pictures of dead fetuses. For the life of me I cannot figure out, not only what you're saying, but what you thought I was saying!
 

McBell

Unbound
Sorry, Mestemia - I'm not following you AT ALL regarding the pictures of dead fetuses. For the life of me I cannot figure out, not only what you're saying, but what you thought I was saying!
nmartin is worried about "tactless" advertising of abortions.

Just how more "tactless" can it get than parading around with pictures of dead fetuses?
 

zenzero

Its only a Label
Friend nnmartin,

Abortion for profit advertising - Yes/No?

The truth is that it is happening and so personal approach would be not to involve in irresponsible sex i.e. to take full responsibility of the outcome of sexual activity involved in, instead of blaming the government which we have democratically elected and allowed them to pass such laws and it is we who should vote responsibly so that those whom we elect represents what we think.

Love & rgds
 

Kathryn

It was on fire when I laid down on it.
Friend nnmartin,



The truth is that it is happening and so personal approach would be not to involve in irresponsible sex i.e. to take full responsibility of the outcome of sexual activity involved in, instead of blaming the government which we have democratically elected and allowed them to pass such laws and it is we who should vote responsibly so that those whom we elect represents what we think.

Love & rgds

Best post on this entire thread! Frubals to you!
 

zenzero

Its only a Label
Friend Kathryn,

Thank you, for reading and understanding.
The basic thing that one should understand in whatever they think or act; is that we are all ONE, as beings and as humans and we ourselves are responsible in our own way for all the good/bad that happens on planet earth.
Solutions to everything is available HERE itself just that one needs to look within to find IT and without which leads from one point to another but never satisfactorily.

Love & rgds
 

nnmartin

Well-Known Member
I don't see much blaming of the government going on here.

That is not my view anyway - no, I would blame the private companies for trying to make money out of this practice in such an upfront manner.
 

Drolefille

PolyPanGeekGirl
I don't see much blaming of the government going on here.

That is not my view anyway - no, I would blame the private companies for trying to make money out of this practice in such an upfront manner.

You're right, how terrible for companies to make money from a medical procedure. They should stop giving vaccines too!

Or is it all for-profit healthcare you oppose?
 

dawny0826

Mother Heathen
I agree with you here but there was an uproar on that thread by certain people saying that the school was wrong.

No doubt some of the same posters, who at the same time are in favour of advertising private abortion for profit on the tv.

Why can a Christian school not bar homosexuals yet another business can promote baby killing?

It doesn't matter whether or not people think the school is in the wrong or that the abortion clinic is in the wrong. If both are private, businesses - they have the ability to create their own product, missions, services, etc. and advertise as appropriate.

If the general public doesn't agree with the services, products and/or mission in which they offer/stand-for, they can choose not to partake.

As I've stated, I choose not to waste energy objecting to that which I can easily ignore as I'm not going to give my businesses to that which I don't condone.
 

nnmartin

Well-Known Member
You're right, how terrible for companies to make money from a medical procedure. They should stop giving vaccines too!

Or is it all for-profit healthcare you oppose?

That is a good question and is actually getting quite close to the key issue.

I guess that I do oppose for-profit healthcare to a large extent.
 

nnmartin

Well-Known Member
wow.

You know, it would probably be a good idea for you to learn what the terms you try to use actually mean before you make a fool of yourself.

you were trying to obfuscate by subterfuge.

Using an example of the dead fetus banner to discuss tact - switching the sides of the focus no less.

That could easily be said to be a case of 'weasel words'.
 

McBell

Unbound
you were trying to obfuscate by subterfuge.
Really?
And what exactly was "I" making unclear?

Using an example of the dead fetus banner to discuss tact - switching the sides of the focus no less.
it is not my fault that some people think parading around with pictures of dead fetuses is tactful.

That could easily be said to be a case of 'weasel words'.
Again, you should learn the definitions of the terms you are trying to use.
 

Alex_G

Enlightner of the Senses
I've just seen this article on the net that tells of new rules in the UK which will allow private abortion clinics to advertise on the TV and radio for the first time.

Although my views on abortion aren't especially strong either way I still think it is wrong that a private for profit company should be allowed to advertise, and hence make money, in this way.

Esentially, making money out of baby killing.

It seems to send out the wrong message.

The comments at the end of the article are interesting.

Is this sort of advertising allowed in the US and what do people think about this in general?

Abortion clinics get TV ad go-ahead - Yahoo!


Whether you agree with abortion or not, the question of whether it is something profit can be morally made on is slightly different question. Additionally its a separate question as to whether you think tv adverts should exist for such clinics.

In my mind abortion is an important issue, and in the ideal world it would be part of free healthcare, and have no strings attached. However, i dont necessarily see a powerful reason why if a private clinic existed and was successful, and was up to standard, cant make some profit from what they do. So long as its not extortionate its no more 'wrong' than any other aspect of the capitalist world.
The only reservation i have is that it might serve to lower the dignity of mothers and their pregnancies, turning them into simple commodities.

Possibly having to pay for abortions might make people take it more seriously, and lower the rates, which might please anti abortionists. But also its a problem if people cannot afford the treatment when they need it, such that i think profiteering is only ok when there is a non profit option too. So that the choice of private is an extra that people can choose, if they have money and prefer the extra service included.

Tv adverts might be inappropriate, as they have a vested interest in promoting the service the bias might lead to the public being exposed to information that numbs down the gravity of the decision to be made, and coerce/convince mothers to choose to have an abortion for the wrong reason. Adverts would have to be subject to a few rules i think.
 

Quiddity

UndertheInfluenceofGiants
a) You aren't going to convince anybody that's a baby anymore then you convince me that it's not. As far as they're concerned, it's no different then taking off a mole or something along those lines.

b) I'd defund abortions if I could and lose no sleep over it. It's a horrible thing being done IMO.

c) Without a doubt I believe abortions are pushed and profits are made. Women don't go to these clinics being 100% sure they want to do it and yet a very high percent of them end up having one.

At any rate, this is my one-hit wonder for this thread as I don't do well debating it. I always end up getting upset.
 

Drolefille

PolyPanGeekGirl
a) You aren't going to convince anybody that's a baby anymore then you convince me that it's not. As far as they're concerned, it's no different then taking off a mole or something along those lines.
Most women who get abortions think quite seriously about it, far more so than 'a mole.' That said, medical science doesn't consider it a baby until viability, and not all religions consider it a baby from conception either. Why is your view inherently correct?
b) I'd defund abortions if I could and lose no sleep over it. It's a horrible thing being done IMO.
And when they're banned (as no federal funding currently covers them in the US, I assume you mean banning) women will still seek them out as they have throughout all of time. Particularly when birth control is inaccessible, but even in modern culture where it's theoretically available (although in practice it isn't.)
When abortion is illegal, it is the woman who dies.
Why does no one who mourns for the 'babies ever mourn for the women? Because she deserved it? There's no good answer.


c) Without a doubt I believe abortions are pushed and profits are made. Women don't go to these clinics being 100% sure they want to do it and yet a very high percent of them end up having one.
Support this by something other than your opinion. Women who go to clinics with a very high level of social stigma attached are already highly motivated. As you note, not all go through with it and yet many do. So where's the disparity?



At any rate, this is my one-hit wonder for this thread as I don't do well debating it. I always end up getting upset.
Hitting an running is hardly better
 
Top