Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
nmartin is worried about "tactless" advertising of abortions.Sorry, Mestemia - I'm not following you AT ALL regarding the pictures of dead fetuses. For the life of me I cannot figure out, not only what you're saying, but what you thought I was saying!
Abortion for profit advertising - Yes/No?
nmartin is worried about "tactless" advertising of abortions.
Just how more "tactless" can it get than parading around with pictures of dead fetuses?
nmartin is worried about "tactless" advertising of abortions.
Just how more "tactless" can it get than parading around with pictures of dead fetuses?
Friend nnmartin,
The truth is that it is happening and so personal approach would be not to involve in irresponsible sex i.e. to take full responsibility of the outcome of sexual activity involved in, instead of blaming the government which we have democratically elected and allowed them to pass such laws and it is we who should vote responsibly so that those whom we elect represents what we think.
Love & rgds
wow.Who is Mr Weasel Words now then?:sarcastic
I don't see much blaming of the government going on here.
That is not my view anyway - no, I would blame the private companies for trying to make money out of this practice in such an upfront manner.
I agree with you here but there was an uproar on that thread by certain people saying that the school was wrong.
No doubt some of the same posters, who at the same time are in favour of advertising private abortion for profit on the tv.
Why can a Christian school not bar homosexuals yet another business can promote baby killing?
You're right, how terrible for companies to make money from a medical procedure. They should stop giving vaccines too!
Or is it all for-profit healthcare you oppose?
wow.
You know, it would probably be a good idea for you to learn what the terms you try to use actually mean before you make a fool of yourself.
Really?you were trying to obfuscate by subterfuge.
it is not my fault that some people think parading around with pictures of dead fetuses is tactful.Using an example of the dead fetus banner to discuss tact - switching the sides of the focus no less.
Again, you should learn the definitions of the terms you are trying to use.That could easily be said to be a case of 'weasel words'.
I've just seen this article on the net that tells of new rules in the UK which will allow private abortion clinics to advertise on the TV and radio for the first time.
Although my views on abortion aren't especially strong either way I still think it is wrong that a private for profit company should be allowed to advertise, and hence make money, in this way.
Esentially, making money out of baby killing.
It seems to send out the wrong message.
The comments at the end of the article are interesting.
Is this sort of advertising allowed in the US and what do people think about this in general?
Abortion clinics get TV ad go-ahead - Yahoo!
Most women who get abortions think quite seriously about it, far more so than 'a mole.' That said, medical science doesn't consider it a baby until viability, and not all religions consider it a baby from conception either. Why is your view inherently correct?a) You aren't going to convince anybody that's a baby anymore then you convince me that it's not. As far as they're concerned, it's no different then taking off a mole or something along those lines.
And when they're banned (as no federal funding currently covers them in the US, I assume you mean banning) women will still seek them out as they have throughout all of time. Particularly when birth control is inaccessible, but even in modern culture where it's theoretically available (although in practice it isn't.)b) I'd defund abortions if I could and lose no sleep over it. It's a horrible thing being done IMO.
Support this by something other than your opinion. Women who go to clinics with a very high level of social stigma attached are already highly motivated. As you note, not all go through with it and yet many do. So where's the disparity?c) Without a doubt I believe abortions are pushed and profits are made. Women don't go to these clinics being 100% sure they want to do it and yet a very high percent of them end up having one.
Hitting an running is hardly betterAt any rate, this is my one-hit wonder for this thread as I don't do well debating it. I always end up getting upset.