Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Many women will attempt to end an unplanned pregnancy. Always have, always will. So it's best that abortion is legal, safe and accessible.
Rape? So do you think if a woman wants an abortion because of rape that the man first needs to be charged, stand trial, and found guilty before she can have an abortion?I am for abortions in only a very few and limited cases:
Rape and/or when the birth will mean nearly certain death to the mother.
Other than those specific examples I am against abortion.
On the other hand, I am all for the "morning after pill".
And yes, I do realize that there is a contradiction in my thinking.
I'm human, get over it.
No. The initial police investigation should be sufficient.Rape? So do you think if a woman wants an abortion because of rape that the man first needs to be charged, stand trial, and found guilty before she can have an abortion?
I'm against the state forcing women to grow fetuses against their will.
No. The initial police investigation should be sufficient.
If someone breaks in to my home and steals all of my stuff, should I have to wait til the burglars are apprehended, trialed, and convicted before my home owner's insurance pays for me to replace my stuff?Guilty with no chance of being proven innocent?
Many women will attempt to end an unplanned pregnancy. Always have, always will. So it's best that abortion is legal, safe and accessible.
I don't think anyone is 'in favor' of abortion, it is merely that a significant number of people are in favor of a woman having the right to abort under certain varying circumstances, such as medical emergencies, rapes, early pregnancies etc.
[/QUOTE]uote=SageTree;3485750]No doubt and pro-choice doesn't mean pro-abortion......
I think its something 99.9% would never actually want to do themselves, but see the necessity of the option.
That's my position, too.I am in favor of a woman having access to safe and legal means to terminate a pregnancy at any stage. Therefore, I support abortion before viability, and induced labor after viability, to put it simply.
Why stop at children who are still in the uterus....why not allow women to kill their children who are outside the uterus?Why should it be a restricted choice? Why couldn't a woman have an abortion for any reason? I think you've also illustrated another point-many 'pro-life' proponents are really 'anti-choice'.
Why stop at children who are still in the uterus....why not allow women to kill their children who are outside the uterus?
It's a child. An unborn child, but still a child.
We don't let women kill children who are born, so why should we let women kill children who are unborn?