About fossils -- would you say this is true?

[Subduction Zone]

Satan won’t reward all this nonsense you spout on forums under different accounts, you do know that?

Satan is a man made invention. You do know that don't you?

What makes you think that I have different accounts?

 

[Subduction Zone]

And one thing that you should keep in mind @Apostle John science only tells us how God did it (if he exists) Science is not there to disprove God. Creationists are calling their own God a liar when they try to read Genesis literally because God's creation tells a completely different story.

 

[Audie]

They’re not my thoughts but those that don’t believe in God the Creator.

Of course they are your ideas, you made them
up, it's nothing better than an insensible attempt to denigrate people you cannot understand on conceptss that are beyond your capacity to talk about.

 

[Audie]

Satan won’t reward all this nonsense you spout on forums under different accounts, you do know that?

We must congratulate you on this post.

It is the purest example of an ad hominem
I've ever seen in RF

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

Satan won’t reward all this nonsense you spout on forums under different accounts, you do know that?

Please provide evidence for the accusation that @Subduction Zone posts under different accounts.

Doesn't your religion say something regard bearing false witness?

 

[Apostle John]

What do you mean by "rocks sticking"?

You need to avoid strawman arguments. You do not seem to understand what other propose.

What do ‘other propose’. Planets forming on their own, will, theoretically, involve rocks colliding with each other and joining together.

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

What do ‘other propose’. Planets forming on their own, will, theoretically, involve rocks colliding with each other and joining together.

What on earth are you on about.....

This seems to fall in the category of "not even wrong".

 

[Subduction Zone]

What do ‘other propose’. Planets forming on their own, will, theoretically, involve rocks colliding with each other and joining together.

It is not "will". I thought that you might be asking about the nebula hypothesis. And I do have an article ready to link on my PC. I can do that after I get up. But why even ask? The topic of this thread is fossils. The topic is evolution, not how planets form.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Please provide evidence for the accusation that @Subduction Zone posts under different accounts.

Doesn't your religion say something regard bearing false witness?

I am curious who he thinks that I am elsewhere. What other forums does he think that I use?

 

[Apostle John]

It is not "will". I thought that you might be asking about the nebula hypothesis. And I do have an article ready to link on my PC. I can do that after I get up. But why even ask? The topic of this thread is fossils. The topic is evolution, not how planets form.

It’s good to see you work around the clock, checking forums even before you get up.

 

[Subduction Zone]

It’s good to see you work around the clock, checking forums even before you get up.

That is why I get the big bucks from RF.

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

I am curious who he thinks that I am elsewhere. What other forums does he think that I use?

Ow, I thought he was saying that you are posting on this forum under different accounts.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Ow, I thought he was saying that you are posting on this forum under different accounts.

He posted that claim more than once. Once it appeared to be about other forms. And at least one it was about here.

 

[metis]

What do ‘other propose’. Planets forming on their own, will, theoretically, involve rocks colliding with each other and joining together.

Elements colliding periodically lead to new compounds.

 

[SkepticThinker]

This is really a response to anyone regarding evidential creativity. Get a crate load of a variety of chemicals of your choice from the periodic table. These we shall call the elements of creation. Then demonstrate by just throwing them up in the air to see if you create anything.

Try your best to create an explosion that demonstrates creativity.

Then, to fast forward your mythical beliefs, get hold of some rocks, any kind and bash them together to show that they stick. This should be an easy demonstration.

What on earth are you talking about? That's not at all how science is done.

 

[SkepticThinker]

No, you‘re wrong to suspect I don’t know, that’s a first class example of how you like guessing. There’s no demonstrations to give the facts so you will always have your inadequate theories

The theory of evolution is the most well evidenced scientific theory in existence. Without it, biology doesn't make any sense. There are mountains and mountains of evidence supporting it, across multiple independent fields of science, collected by multiple independent groups of scientists across the globe over the last 150+ years. Evolution is a demonstrable fact of life.

 

[Apostle John]

The theory of evolution is the most well evidenced scientific theory in existence. Without it, biology doesn't make any sense. There are mountains and mountains of evidence supporting it, across multiple independent fields of science, collected by multiple independent groups of scientists across the globe over the last 150+ years. Evolution is a demonstrable fact of life.

Aren’t biologists now starting to think of more than one cradle of civilisation. That’s batty thinking.

 

[Apostle John]

Elements colliding periodically lead to new compounds.

You won’t be shy demonstrating it then. Why don’t you fast forward this concept and put an amino acid on some rocky mud, water it occasionally and leave in the sun and win yourself a Nobel prize exploding a myth.

 

[SkepticThinker]

Aren’t biologists now starting to think of more than one cradle of civilisation. That’s batty thinking.

What does that have to do with what I said??

 

[Apostle John]

What does that have to do with what I said??

Oh, I forgot you said you practiced a pseudoscience. Allow me to spell it out for you this is what you said:-

The theory of evolution is the most well evidenced scientific theory in existence. Without it, biology doesn't make any sense. There are mountains and mountains of evidence supporting it, across multiple independent fields of science, collected by multiple independent groups of scientists across the globe over the last 150+ years. Evolution is a demonstrable fact of life.

So the multiple cradles of civilisation put forward by evolutionary biologists propose they occurred in what is termed the old world and the new world. If you look at these geographical areas, it doesn’t explain demonstrably or factually why the language of Native Americans is similar to Russian.

The scattering of the nations at the Tower of Babel does explain this perfectly.