He identifies as Karaite / Ebionite...now, I know that those are two different groups, but I assume he is a Karaite who became a certain type of Messianic Jew.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
He identifies as Karaite / Ebionite...now, I know that those are two different groups, but I assume he is a Karaite who became a certain type of Messianic Jew.
Greetings,
You have to remember the concepts you have as Christians are not shared in the Hebrew Tanakh. Even the Christian definition of a "messiah" is not corralated to the concept of a (משיח) i.e. a leader who is anointed with oil. In this situation a Davidic King.
That being said, think of it in the following way. Jews of today are descendents of the israelis who were brought out of Egypt. There are times in the Hebrew Torah it is written that Hashem brought Israel out of Egypt and there are times where it is written as if Mosheh ben-Amram (Moses) did it. During that time Hashem brought Israel out of Egypt and the person who Hashem chose to faciliate and lead the people out of Egypt was Hashem. Hashem gets the credit for causing, creating, and facilitating the who operation. Mosheh ben-Amram (Moses) is credited with being the leader that Hashem built up, instructed, and instituted as the mechanisim for the operation.
By like token the future Davidic king will be the person/leader that Hashem will choose to facilitate/lead the return of the entire Jewish people to the land of Israel. I.e. the credit will go to Hashem since Hashem will chose to faciliate and lead the return of the remaining Jews to Israel.
Please note: That according to the Tanakh Jews being in the land of Israel doesn't mean that the exile is over. Until there is a Torah based government structure with Davidic king, we Jews are still in some level of exile.
Concerning Yeshayahu (what Christians call Isaiah), here is a video I did in response to a Christian missionary about Christians view things there.
I'd agree with everything that Ehav4Ever has stated in post #10, however I'd like to point out:
A secular state of Jews in the land of Israel actually makes ending exile much, much more difficult, IMHO.
Barring a miracle, I don't see a redemption coming. The opposite in fact.
The Davidic king is the most probable method that HaShem would use to return the exiled Jews
back to the land, but there was a time before we had kings and it was the Sanhedrin and Temple
service that formed the Nation.
There isn't just one exile and redemption established by Deuteronomy, so there is not just one
Messiah, and that a Messiah does not necessarily need be a king if there is no kinghood established.
HaShem is the only king we actually need. And he can use whatever method he chooses to manifest his will.
Not only that, just as there is a Messiah ben David who leads back from exile, there can also be a
Messiah ben Yosef who establishes a place for the nation's exile. Yosef brought Israel into Egypt.
He identifies as Karaite / Ebionite...now, I know that those are two different groups, but I assume he is a Karaite who became a certain type of Messianic Jew.
Quite right, Matthew ONLY
(sometimes when I'm extremely frustrated with replacement theology, ONLY the Sermon on the MT.)
I follow Yeshua ONLY because to me he is Meshiach ben Yosef, the precursor to Galut Edom.
NOT ben David or any kind of divinity. I am Israel, no intermediary is required or allowed.
Yes I understand that about Moses and Hashem, but still wonder how the Messiah is the one to do the leading from Deut 30 or another verse in the Tanakh.
Christians have a time of the exiles which seems to end when Jerusalem stops being trampled under foot by the gentiles. This is probably when the Temple will be built and the Torah based government structure will start.
Have all the Messiah claimants in the past been anointed by oil? and if so, why and by whom and when?
Sorry, too many questions. Only if you know the answers.
Sorry the audio is non existent on my computer. Maybe I could try to see it on my phone or something.
We won't know until he answers.I am not sure it went in that direction. Most Karaites I have come across are anti-Jesus of all flavors. Most of the times it is Messianic somehow first then partially Karaite later.
'Course, there was a pretty famous Karaite named Mishwayahi al-Ukbari (I probably misspelled it) who was considered an extremist Karaite and eventually converted to Christianity.
Ebionites came well before the Karaites. Today you can be both.
You don't get to decide what I am.
Cyrus no doubt is the anointed who caused Israel to return to the land.
I see the Messiah ben Davis and Messiah ben Joseph as the one Messiah of course.
What do you say about the anointing of the Messiah with oil?
BTW, You really didn't expect me to be able to read that Judeo-Arabic did you? You're just grandstanding.
I wish I knew Judeo-Arabic. Do you know it?Actually, what I posted earlier was as a Hebrew translation of what Rav Saadya Gaon wrote and not the original Judeo-Arabic. I have the original Judeo-Arabic at home I know that a large number people can't read it these days so I would never use that as a test.
Grandstanding no. Trying to understand what your concept of being an Ebionite is about yes.
Thus, if you define as a Karaite it is obviously something different than what has been historically Karaitism.
Trying to understand what your concept of being an Ebionite is about yes
I wish I knew Judeo-Arabic. Do you know it?
Did I not answer this back in post #15?
Matthew only, check.
Yeshua is NOT Messiah ben David OR divine so ...Christian... obviously not.
Yeshua as Messiah ben Yosef... yes.
I don't think I am a historically accurate Karaite OR Ebionite. It's simply the most accurate label.
Likewise do you think you are a historically accurate Israelite? How far back can you go before
what you practice is significantly divergent from the original? Second Temple? FIRST Temple?
Greetings,
You did explain it a bit, but there are some things that aren't clear to me. I am trying to understand how you came to it. Were you born into a family that holds the way you describe or did you learn it from someone or did you teach it to yourself?
Also, which version of Matthew do you use? I have heard of only two "older" Hebrew versions of Matthew (Munster and DuTillet) which have a bit of a shady history. Are you saying you posses a version of Matthew that came from the original Ebionites?