Dirty Penguin
Master Of Ceremony
But is YEC in harmony with what is actually recorded in Genesis?
Genesis is not wrong, rather YEC is wrong.
Both are incorrect......
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
But is YEC in harmony with what is actually recorded in Genesis?
Genesis is not wrong, rather YEC is wrong.
Genesis is rediculous.
Well the thread question is not aimed at those that accept and understand that the earth is billions of years old. It seems to be aimed at (YEC). I personally feel there's nothing wrong with challenging the (so-called) "creation science" on their findings.
So far there's seems to be no real method as to how they determine the age of the earth. It appears they take a literal approach starting with their bible. Unfortunately for them their bible is not spot on when dealing with sciences such as biology, mathematics, geology, paleontology, or history....etc...etc....etc...
Now with all of this against them I'm astounded at the lengths they go to in order to to align the known natural world with their religious beliefs.
The earth is REALLY REALLY old..
Love
Dallas
Well the thread question is not aimed at those that accept and understand that the earth is billions of years old. It seems to be aimed at (YEC). I personally feel there's nothing wrong with challenging the (so-called) "creation science" on their findings.
So far there's seems to be no real method as to how they determine the age of the earth.
I think you are forgetting that it created light and darkness, and called one day and the other night, and it also mean that one night and one morning, hence making up an entire day....uravip2me said:Genesis is dealing with getting the earth ready for mankind to inhabit from two different viewpoints. Gen 1:1-2:4 describing creation, and Gen 2:5-4:26 concentrates on creation of human race and its fall from human perfection of healthy mind and body.
The length of the creative days are not known. It is not stated if each creative day is of the same length. All six creative days are summed up as a day at Gen 2:4. The 7th day is still ongoing.
Genesis 1:5 said:And there was evening, and there was morning—the first day.
I think you are forgetting that it created light and darkness, and called one day and the other night, and it also mean that one night and one morning, hence making up an entire day....
...and for each successive day, the same thing: "And there was evening and there was morning -" ...in x successive day in Genesis 1:8, 10, 13, 19, 23, 31.
The Genesis don't mention week, month or year.
Why do you think the length of a creative day is not known?
The clues are there in plain sight. Why do you insist in ignoring the last part of each creative day?
And if a evening and morning don't make up a whole day, then what does it mean?
Oh please. Let stick with the planet Earth. And please stay out of the Arctic Circle too. Nothing indicated that Creation of Adam and Eve at Eden took place anywhere near the Arctic Circle.s-word said:A day is divided into a period of Darkness followed by an equal period of light. How long those periods last depends on where you are; on the equator, 12 hours of darkness 12 hours of light, or the North pole, 6 months of darkness, six onths of light, Mers, Jupiter, where ever, the periods of time are different.
Oh please. Let stick with the planet Earth. And please stay out of the Arctic Circle too. Nothing indicated that Creation of Adam and Eve at Eden took place anywhere near the Arctic Circle.
You are forgetting 2 important things in the Genesis that would exclude your silly day or night lasting 6 months each: namely rivers -
Euphrate
and Tigris.
Why would day and night have been 6 months when no one had been to the artic circle or even near it during that time?
You're not real flash mate, are ya? if you had read post 88, you would know that the referrence to Mars, Jupiter The North Pole and the Equator were only to point out the fact that the length of day is determined by the veiw point of where you are coming from, and nothing to do with the length of a creative day, which is a period of universal activity that is preceeded and followered by a period of universal rest.
s-word said:Yea! Well it's obvious that you have not read post 88 in relation to the creative days as recorded in Gensis as the generations of the universe. Good night mate.
2 Peter 3:8 is nothing but a senseless metaphor.2 Peter 3:8 said:But do not forget this one thing, dear friends: With the Lord a day is like a thousand years, and a thousand years are like a day.
No, i just don't facilitate poor efforts to make genesis look reasonably intillectual. A creative day is what ever you want it to be, thats how subjective the bible is.
Sure, you sighted a few sources, but i bet if you tried, you could find 500 more suggesting a creative day is 1 day or a 24 hour period.
This thread would work a lot better if people used science instead of theology.
Believe as you will young fellow, that's the beauty of having a free will.
It doesn't make any different, because your argument of each creative day lasting a thousand year, don't make sense.
Genesis say that plants was created in the 3rd day, so a thousand year, without sun light, doesn't make sense at all, because the sun, moon and stars was created after this on the 4th day. Most of plants required sunlight and heat.
And yet you have light and darkness, which is called day and night, on the 1st day, but the sun and moon not created until 2000 years later, again your 1 day = 1000 years is senseless, illogical and scientifically impossible.
Mentioning this nonsense about 1 day equalling a thousand year from Peter, doesn't mean anything.
2 Peter 3:8 is nothing but a senseless metaphor.
Belief is not a word i hold in high regard.
I don't believe, i just see what i see.
What a pity that you can't use some of you hidden atributes like 'Logic' and see that which cannot be seen with your eyes.
From what i've seen you wouldn't know logic if it hit you in the face.
Our society is built on top of people like me getting their geology right. If i was wrong, i would not be very good at my job would i?