• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Almost Everything You Think You Know Is A Lie

Kangaroo Feathers

Yea, it is written in the Book of Cyril...
[


The Federal Reserve has to do with everything. You ask why they would want to suppress anything? You won't watch the documentary. That's a problem. I bet I couldn't pay you to watch it. That's an example of their power.
If you gave the brief overview I requested, I might. Is there a reason you're not prepared to respond to my questions in your own words? It's a courtesy I have extended you, reciprocateion would be appreciated.
What claims specifically do you require evidence for? I posted some videos and you already said you won't watch them.
What I said was "I don't watch uncommentated youtube clips", i.e. if you commentate it, I'll watch at least the relevant portion. I'm here for a discussion, after all. I'd like to read your own thoughts and words about your claims. I've spent literal months of my life watching and reading esoteric material. If I wanted to watch youtube clips on it, I can find them myself. I'm pretty familiar with what to expect, hence I'm asking YOU questions.

I think I've been pretty clear about what I'm requesting evidence for. Have I been unclear?

But if you like, let's start with the main one, where is your evidence for remains of giants? And please follow that with your evidence that THAT evidence has been supressed or destroyed?
 
Last edited:

Kangaroo Feathers

Yea, it is written in the Book of Cyril...
So all of YouTube is invalid then. Ok. I guess that makes Google invalid as well .
Youtube videos without credible or accurate citations are unreliable. As is anything you find on Google without them. Note well, @Subduction Zone said they were "unreliable" not "invalid". There is a difference.

You said you have formal academic experience, right? This is pretty basic stuff. Is there any particular reason you seem to be getting irritated by people asking for a fairly simple showing of basic rigour?

If I came to YOU making claims contrary to what you understood to be accurate, would you accept what I said on faith, or would YOU ask for evidence?
 
Last edited:

Polymath257

Think & Care
Staff member
Premium Member
Watch this. To disbelief something because of lack of evidence is contrary to science at least theoretic phsyics.

Why in the world do you think this? Yes, there is a lot of *speculation* in theoretical physics. That is part of the job. But *belief* is evidence-based, not speculation-based.

That's why we needed to actually *verify* the existence of the Higg's boson, as opposed to simply relying on the previous theoretical work.
 

Kangaroo Feathers

Yea, it is written in the Book of Cyril...
Why in the world do you think this? Yes, there is a lot of *speculation* in theoretical physics. That is part of the job. But *belief* is evidence-based, not speculation-based.

That's why we needed to actually *verify* the existence of the Higg's boson, as opposed to simply relying on the previous theoretical work.
Further, theoretical physics is based on mathematical evidence. It's not practical, observable evidence, but it most certainly still is evidence. You don't "believe" theoretical physics without it.
 

Polymath257

Think & Care
Staff member
Premium Member
Further, theoretical physics is based on mathematical evidence. It's not practical, observable evidence, but it most certainly still is evidence. You don't "believe" theoretical physics without it.

It is evidence of internal consistency, which is a low bar, although surprisingly difficult to get over.

Math is a language and can be used to model many non-factual situations, though, so using math as the 'evidence' is very far from being enough for 'belief'.
 

Kangaroo Feathers

Yea, it is written in the Book of Cyril...
It is evidence of internal consistency, which is a low bar, although surprisingly difficult to get over.

Math is a language and can be used to model many non-factual situations, though, so using math as the 'evidence' is very far from being enough for 'belief'.
I appreciate that. My comment was intended as a follow on response, though.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Trump planned on water for shielding.
FYI....
How to Protect Astronauts from Space Radiation on Mars
ecause protons and neutrons are similar in size, one element blocks both extremely well—hydrogen, which most commonly exists as just a single proton and an electron. Conveniently, hydrogen is the most abundant element in the universe, and makes up substantial parts of some common compounds, such as water and plastics like polyethylene. Engineers could take advantage of already-required mass by processing the astronauts’ trash into plastic-filled tiles used to bolster radiation protection. Water, already required for the crew, could be stored strategically to create a kind of radiation storm shelter in the spacecraft or habitat. However, this strategy comes with some challenges—the crew would need to use the water and then replace it with recycled water from the advanced life support systems.
 

Kelly of the Phoenix

Well-Known Member
Because the native Americans and my ancestors all had tales of giants .
I'm 4'10". Most people are "giants" to me. :p

The Federal Reserve has to do with everything. You ask why they would want to suppress anything? You won't watch the documentary. That's a problem. I bet I couldn't pay you to watch it. That's an example of their power.
The thing is, I can't trust my government to spell official documents correctly, and you want me to believe they are super intelligent and did all this stuff, but they're still rather incompetent because some random youtuber found out.

Having trouble finding it, but there's this cartoon where a couple are deflated at the idea that if Area 51 really existed (or, rather, the alien part of the story), Trump wouldn't be able to keep his mouth shut about it, so they realize the alien thing is fake.

This video is more reliable.
LOL. C'mon. I'm not exactly an image expert but that skull is so pasted on there I'm surprised glue isn't running out. Have you noticed in those videos, the context is never readily available? Just extreme close-ups of human skeletons or random bones from other animals trying to be passed off as human. All skeletons clearly human with context are normal sized. The thumbnail is clickbait because it doesn't appear in the video. Seriously. Learn how to Youtube.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Watch this. To disbelief something because of lack of evidence is contrary to science at least theoretic phsyics.

This video is more reliable.

You really should take some basic science classes. You might learn of the cube/square law. Giants, at least in the picture as shown in your YouTube link, are photoshop and nothing else. The Biblical Goliath would not have been a fierce warrior he would have been a bedridden invalid.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
@Orias since you like YouTube videos here is one where some of those giant stories are refuted. Start it at the 2:15 mark. As I said many of those are photoshopped and he shows the original source of the skulls. Heck, some of the fakers use the same picture of a skull for different "giants":

 

YmirGF

Bodhisattva in Recovery
Watch this. To disbelief something because of lack of evidence is contrary to science at least theoretic phsyics.

This video is more reliable.

More reliable? By who's standards? Hell, I could almost feel my IQ dropping while I watched this stupidity.

Youtube videos without credible or accurate citations are unreliable. As is anything you find on Google without them. Note well, @Subduction Zone said they were "unreliable" not "invalid". There is a difference.
One would expect a student of linguistics to be up on that nuance. Weird, eh?
 
Last edited:

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
My brother and I visited a submarine posted outside Carnegie Science museum. He was very uncomfortable but I walked through the tiny rooms and hallways just fine. :)
A friend has a permanent back injury as a result of being overly tall
for doorways on Navy ships. Too much stooping over for many years.
 
I challenge everyone of you to update your information on the following topics.

The discovery of EMF and electromagnetism.

The Cold war and Admiral Byrd's expedition to antarctica.

The creation of NASA in 1959 and landing on the moon in 1969.

Between 1955 and 1992 the Russians did 36 expeditions to the South Pole, during which times we we're supposedly at the peak height of space exploration against Russia. But they weren't going to space, instead they went to antarctica.

Recently Russian naval forces sent a convoy including Saudi Arabia vessels to the antarctica and their expedition was mainland. At this time many world leaders also went to mainland South Pole, including Putin and John Kerry, and the Pope

I challenge you to investigate the legitimacy of WW2 and the fight against the Nazis and the spread of international communism which started the Vietnam proxy war.

I challenge you to investigate Hitler and his obsession with the occult and his exploration of the South Pole.

I challenge you to research the various species of humans that are known to have existed, this includes humans dating back millions of years. This includes giants and what we would refer to as "fairies" all having existed and having actual fossils.

Take the time and challenge what you think you know.

I am able to provide sources and more information at specific request. I realize many will also try and make a mockery of this. And so I would also ask the question, which way does the water flow? And do you consider yourself a free thinker? Don't be afraid to swim against the stream.

A lie is a man made concept. Truth is a man made concept. None of it matters.
 
Top