Orias
Left Hand Path
No, YouTube videos made by purveyors of woo are extremely unreliable. You as much as admit that you are wrong by referring to such.
So all of YouTube is invalid then. Ok. I guess that makes Google invalid as well .
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
No, YouTube videos made by purveyors of woo are extremely unreliable. You as much as admit that you are wrong by referring to such.
If you gave the brief overview I requested, I might. Is there a reason you're not prepared to respond to my questions in your own words? It's a courtesy I have extended you, reciprocateion would be appreciated.[
The Federal Reserve has to do with everything. You ask why they would want to suppress anything? You won't watch the documentary. That's a problem. I bet I couldn't pay you to watch it. That's an example of their power.
What I said was "I don't watch uncommentated youtube clips", i.e. if you commentate it, I'll watch at least the relevant portion. I'm here for a discussion, after all. I'd like to read your own thoughts and words about your claims. I've spent literal months of my life watching and reading esoteric material. If I wanted to watch youtube clips on it, I can find them myself. I'm pretty familiar with what to expect, hence I'm asking YOU questions.What claims specifically do you require evidence for? I posted some videos and you already said you won't watch them.
Youtube videos without credible or accurate citations are unreliable. As is anything you find on Google without them. Note well, @Subduction Zone said they were "unreliable" not "invalid". There is a difference.So all of YouTube is invalid then. Ok. I guess that makes Google invalid as well .
...um...To disbelief something because of lack of evidence is contrary to science at least theoretic phsyics.
Watch this. To disbelief something because of lack of evidence is contrary to science at least theoretic phsyics.
Further, theoretical physics is based on mathematical evidence. It's not practical, observable evidence, but it most certainly still is evidence. You don't "believe" theoretical physics without it.Why in the world do you think this? Yes, there is a lot of *speculation* in theoretical physics. That is part of the job. But *belief* is evidence-based, not speculation-based.
That's why we needed to actually *verify* the existence of the Higg's boson, as opposed to simply relying on the previous theoretical work.
Further, theoretical physics is based on mathematical evidence. It's not practical, observable evidence, but it most certainly still is evidence. You don't "believe" theoretical physics without it.
I appreciate that. My comment was intended as a follow on response, though.It is evidence of internal consistency, which is a low bar, although surprisingly difficult to get over.
Math is a language and can be used to model many non-factual situations, though, so using math as the 'evidence' is very far from being enough for 'belief'.
FYI....Trump planned on water for shielding.
I'm 4'10". Most people are "giants" to me.Because the native Americans and my ancestors all had tales of giants .
The thing is, I can't trust my government to spell official documents correctly, and you want me to believe they are super intelligent and did all this stuff, but they're still rather incompetent because some random youtuber found out.The Federal Reserve has to do with everything. You ask why they would want to suppress anything? You won't watch the documentary. That's a problem. I bet I couldn't pay you to watch it. That's an example of their power.
LOL. C'mon. I'm not exactly an image expert but that skull is so pasted on there I'm surprised glue isn't running out. Have you noticed in those videos, the context is never readily available? Just extreme close-ups of human skeletons or random bones from other animals trying to be passed off as human. All skeletons clearly human with context are normal sized. The thumbnail is clickbait because it doesn't appear in the video. Seriously. Learn how to Youtube.This video is more reliable.
You're the perfect size for an astronaut.I'm 4'10". Most people are "giants" to me.
You really should take some basic science classes. You might learn of the cube/square law. Giants, at least in the picture as shown in your YouTube link, are photoshop and nothing else. The Biblical Goliath would not have been a fierce warrior he would have been a bedridden invalid.Watch this. To disbelief something because of lack of evidence is contrary to science at least theoretic phsyics.
This video is more reliable.
Links by loons are invalid. You need to learn how to parse your sources.So all of YouTube is invalid then. Ok. I guess that makes Google invalid as well .
My brother and I visited a submarine posted outside Carnegie Science museum. He was very uncomfortable but I walked through the tiny rooms and hallways just fine.You're the perfect size for an astronaut.
More reliable? By who's standards? Hell, I could almost feel my IQ dropping while I watched this stupidity.Watch this. To disbelief something because of lack of evidence is contrary to science at least theoretic phsyics.
This video is more reliable.
One would expect a student of linguistics to be up on that nuance. Weird, eh?Youtube videos without credible or accurate citations are unreliable. As is anything you find on Google without them. Note well, @Subduction Zone said they were "unreliable" not "invalid". There is a difference.
A friend has a permanent back injury as a result of being overly tallMy brother and I visited a submarine posted outside Carnegie Science museum. He was very uncomfortable but I walked through the tiny rooms and hallways just fine.
I challenge everyone of you to update your information on the following topics.
The discovery of EMF and electromagnetism.
The Cold war and Admiral Byrd's expedition to antarctica.
The creation of NASA in 1959 and landing on the moon in 1969.
Between 1955 and 1992 the Russians did 36 expeditions to the South Pole, during which times we we're supposedly at the peak height of space exploration against Russia. But they weren't going to space, instead they went to antarctica.
Recently Russian naval forces sent a convoy including Saudi Arabia vessels to the antarctica and their expedition was mainland. At this time many world leaders also went to mainland South Pole, including Putin and John Kerry, and the Pope
I challenge you to investigate the legitimacy of WW2 and the fight against the Nazis and the spread of international communism which started the Vietnam proxy war.
I challenge you to investigate Hitler and his obsession with the occult and his exploration of the South Pole.
I challenge you to research the various species of humans that are known to have existed, this includes humans dating back millions of years. This includes giants and what we would refer to as "fairies" all having existed and having actual fossils.
Take the time and challenge what you think you know.
I am able to provide sources and more information at specific request. I realize many will also try and make a mockery of this. And so I would also ask the question, which way does the water flow? And do you consider yourself a free thinker? Don't be afraid to swim against the stream.