Mr Spinkles
Mr
One can't expect yossarian to give a 'rebuttal' to Super Universe's post, as his post was not an argument, but an evasion in the form of innacurate generalization.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Fairly ironic post.You certainly had nothing, at least no reasonable rebuttal.
Fairly ironic post.
Until you can show that God has some measurable effect, the analogy falls flat.
One can't expect yossarian to give a 'rebuttal' to Super Universe's post, as his post was not an argument, but an evasion in the form of innacurate generalization.
To which you respondedShow us the measurable, perceptible effects of God, then.
I am still waiting for a measurable effect of God.
Athiests battle cry "Oh God, please let there be nothing!"
"does to" "does not" / "your wrong" "nuh uh you are"
is not a good agument.
wa:do
Well, if you are going to argue that everything is God, then god is a fairly useless term.Couldn't the universe be evidence of God?
Yes, because people routinely floated off the planet prior to Newton.Once upon a time in the history of man gravoity was an unknown and unseen force in the physical world.
Yes, because people routinely floated off the planet prior to Newton.
Well, if you are going to argue that everything is God, then god is a fairly useless term.
Which has what to do with anything?And we don't float off the world now, do we?
How is that an apt analogy?Is calling a person Joan instead of "human female" useless?
,How is that an apt analogy?
Throwing quotes at me does not make your analogy any more valid.As the Christians might say: There is non so blind as he who will not see."
To quote Stephen King: "He thrusts his fists against the posts and still insists he sees no ghosts. . . . "