Because I've read the story. Why should I not comment?Why do you speak of things that you do not believe?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Because I've read the story. Why should I not comment?Why do you speak of things that you do not believe?
There's no sign of the Kingdom anywhere.For the people who obey the Kingdom, it is established. I think you have some work to do if it isn't established for you.
The thing obviously finished was his earthly mission. He'd known all along how it would end (Mark 2:20).
The Kingdom was supposed to happen within the lifetime of some of his hearers (Mark 9:1 and 13:28, Matthew 16:28 and 24:32, Luke 9:27); but either that was a typo or something's gone wrong or in the end they just couldn't be bothered.
Because I've read the story. Why should I not comment?
You will never reach that group, ever. (Actually, to me: who cares!)John 3:13 does not mean that whoever died before Jesus Christ died will never be in Heaven.
It just means that he had to go first.
No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven--the Son of Man. John 3:13
For David did not ascend to heaven, and yet he said, "'The Lord said to my Lord: "Sit at my right hand Acts 2:34
I am not aware (and neither are YOU, gb) that Acts of the Apostles 2:34 ever said does not. It is written, "did not" and that is the truth.
When David, Daniel, Moses, Elijah and all the others died they had to wait in their death until Jesus performed God's will and thus made the way for them.
If (I say if because nobody knows) they get there Jesus will be there before them. John 3:13 They will see him. He will be there.
OK?
I appreciate your post. Thanks ─ as a result I now know that we were both right, and that 'the kingdom of God' has two meanings.Again, you have not understood what you have read.
Luke 17
20Once, on being asked by the Pharisees when the kingdom of God would come, Jesus replied, “The coming of the kingdom of God is not something that can be observed, 21nor will people say, ‘Here it is,’ or ‘There it is,’ because the kingdom of God is in your midst.”
I have the words in a respected translation. They have a meaning and in one sense or the other an historical context. That's all I need.Because you do not understand and cannot fully understand the word of God if you deny it.
I have the words in a respected translation. They have a meaning and in one sense or the other an historical context. That's all I need.
I appreciate your post. Thanks ─ as a result I now know that we were both right, and that 'the kingdom of God' has two meanings.
A quick search turns up 65 NT verses containing the phrase 'the kingdom of God'.
The first meaning (let's say) is the one you suggest, that it's equivalent to the presently-living faithful, the church. I find nine NT verses which support that ─ Mark 4:26, 10:15, Matthew 12.28, Luke 10:9, 10:11, 11:20, 17:20, 17:21, Romans 14:17.
The second meaning sees the kingdom of God as a future thing, some verses meaning on earth (which is what I had in mind), others possibly in Heaven. I find nineteen NT verses which support that ─ Mark 1:15, 9:1, 9:47, 10:23, 10:24, 14:25, Matthew 21:31, Luke 7:28, 9:27, 13:28, 21:31, 22:16. 22:18, Acts 14:22, 1 Corinthians 6:9, 6:10, 15:50, Galatians 5:21, 2 Thessalonians 1:5. and perhaps one other, Acts 1:2.
A further 36 verses that mention the kingdom of God could mean either.
Good to clear these things up.
What bias is that?Opinion noted and rejected. You don't understand what you're reading - your own bias clouds your judgement - heavily.
So you're not interested in what the bible actually says?Well, if you think what you're reading is trash, why do you even bother?
Nobody knows what real words were made aware of and written.So you're not interested in what the bible actually says?
You know what it ought to say, so the real words are irrelevant?
Understood.
Christianity nonetheless claims to be based on the canonical NT text.Nobody knows what real words were made aware of and written.
It is why I do not advertise that I am a Christian.Christianity nonetheless claims to be based on the canonical NT text.
Even if some enormous percentage of them never concern themselves with reading it.
Have you chosen to separate from the JWs?I wonder what decision you think I have made?
Yes, I did. I am not going to tell them though. Why not? It is THEIR rule to publically separate.Have you chosen to separate from the JWs?