cladking
Well-Known Member
Again, this “homo omnisciencis” don’t exist. You are the only person i know that use this pseudoscience species.
...
So if you are going talk about species, then the least you can do, is use the proper conventions.
So I need to go back to school to even be a pseudo-scientist. It's interesting you believe this even after I repeatedly say I don't even believe in "rabbits". No matter what you call them I don't believe there is such a thing but you want me to capitalize a nonexistent word using your rules!
OK, just for you; Homo omnisciensis. Do you now believe we are a different species than the Homo sapiens sapiens who built the great pyramids? Do you now understand that we've grown a new speech center to translate the digital brain to an analog language? Am I magically correct because I've used standard capitalization?
You still disagree and still don't understand the argument would be my guess.
Are you aware of all the experiments that show we understand the world chiefly in terms of our beliefs? If animals don't have beliefs (just like Ancient Language had no words for belief) then what do they use to drive their behavior? Is it really so absurd to believe they model reality itself in terms of their instincts, genes, experience, and language? Is it really so strange to believe animals have consciousness and this consciousness aids in their survival. Have you ever seen a mother "rabbit" beat off a "bobcat" to save its baby? What told it how to maneuver and kick in such a way as to drive off a bobcat? Was it simple belief in a rabbit "god"? Or maybe it has the ability to think and learn. Did it cast a spell on the bobcat to make it stupid? If magic doesn't work to preserve the lives of baby rabbits then why would a species as "smart" as man try to use magic to survive? Where is your evidence that "neter" meant "God"?
Egyptological beliefs are illogical, non sequitur, and unevidenced but you still call my fact, experiment, and logic based theory that makes sound prediction, "pseudo-science".
One of the biggest reasons yopu can't believe it is that you can't imagine what you believe is "science" can be even a little bit wrong. You can't believe anything in religion can be even a little bit right. It doesn't matter one whit to you whether the "science" is based on experiment or not and it doesn't matter what the Bible is based on. Science good, religion bad. This is a knee jerk reaction and doesn't require evidence, logic, or even thought. Just like everyone else you already have every answer and your every experience reinforces them; Homo omnisciensis.
Meanwhile our ancestors were wise and left us a time capsule they knew we'd someday be able to open; Homo sapiens.
But we're too damn superstitious to even see the evidence.