• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Another irrefutable proof that God created all things using mathematical induction. And a proof that The Bible is the word of God.

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Refute if you can. Obviously you cannot.
One proof used mathematical induction.
The other used the law of non contradiction.
I gave you the two hours that I said that I would give you and that is all that you could come up with? Just another admission that you were wrong by running away?

I already refuted your "mathematical deduction. You ran away from a reasonable question when it was clear that you did not understand the refutation. I will repeat your error again. You used a false premise. I explained to you how it was a false premise more than once. You have no answer. When you kept denying the obvious I asked you in your own words to define "premise". Since you did not understand the refutation and it was based on the concept of a premise that was a reasonable question. But you ran away, more than once.

Until you define premise in your own words I will take that as an admission of defeat on your part.
 

SavedByTheLord

Well-Known Member
I gave you the two hours that I said that I would give you and that is all that you could come up with? Just another admission that you were wrong by running away?

I already refuted your "mathematical deduction. You ran away from a reasonable question when it was clear that you did not understand the refutation. I will repeat your error again. You used a false premise. I explained to you how it was a false premise more than once. You have no answer. When you kept denying the obvious I asked you in your own words to define "premise". Since you did not understand the refutation and it was based on the concept of a premise that was a reasonable question. But you ran away, more than once.

Until you define premise in your own words I will take that as an admission of defeat on your part.
There is nothing of substance in your reply. I gave you more than 2 hours and nothing of substance at all.
 

SavedByTheLord

Well-Known Member
Such weak mimicry. But it id still a tacit admission that you are wrong, so thank you.
Please refute if you can.
2 irrefutable proofs and yet you cannot refute either.

All the facts, all logic, all probability, statistics, math, physics, chemistry, biology, logic, everything in existence refutes the false theory of evolution and billions of years.

And no one has met the simple challenge I gave.
 

McBell

Unbound
Please refute if you can.
2 irrefutable proofs and yet you cannot refute either.

All the facts, all logic, all probability, statistics, math, physics, chemistry, biology, logic, everything in existence refutes the false theory of evolution and billions of years.

And no one has met the simple challenge I gave.
So much bearing false witness in such a little space...

I am truly impressed.

Perhaps we can get the Mods to check to see if you have set a record.....
 

F1fan

Veteran Member
Please refute if you can.
2 irrefutable proofs and yet you cannot refute either.

All the facts, all logic, all probability, statistics, math, physics, chemistry, biology, logic, everything in existence refutes the false theory of evolution and billions of years.
You don't get science right, and that means you lose. You offer no valid alternative.
And no one has met the simple challenge I gave.
Who cares, you aren't a scientist. If you think you can beat science by dabbling on an internet forum you are sadly naive. To beat science you need to beat the science as an expert with better science, which you aren't. And you haven't.
 

SavedByTheLord

Well-Known Member
You don't get science right, and that means you lose. You offer no valid alternative.

Who cares, you aren't a scientist. If you think you can beat science by dabbling on an internet forum you are sadly naive. To beat science you need to beat the science as an expert with better science, which you aren't. And you haven't.
Evolution is not science at all, just a false religion
 

SavedByTheLord

Well-Known Member
So much bearing false witness in such a little space...

I am truly impressed.

Perhaps we can get the Mods to check to see if you have set a record.....
Stop the constant false accusations. Debate 101 techniques show that you are defending a false position.
 

McBell

Unbound
Stop the constant false accusations.
I have not made any false accusations.

what was the first living creature? Please give a real answer, the official answer if you want.
when is a black dog most likely to enter a white house?
Why isn't phonetic spelled the way it sounds?
How did a fool and his money get together?
What do they use to ship styrofoam?
If a book about failures doesn't sell, is it a success?
Does fuzzy logic tickle?
If a stealth bomber crashes in a forest, will it make a sound?
Would a fly without wings be called a walk?
Is it possible to be a closet claustrophobic?
 

SavedByTheLord

Well-Known Member
I have not made any false accusations.


when is a black dog most likely to enter a white house?
Why isn't phonetic spelled the way it sounds?
How did a fool and his money get together?
What do they use to ship styrofoam?
If a book about failures doesn't sell, is it a success?
Does fuzzy logic tickle?
If a stealth bomber crashes in a forest, will it make a sound?
Would a fly without wings be called a walk?
Is it possible to be a closet claustrophobic?
When and where did the first living creation, NeverHappenedASaurus, come into being?
What composed its protective layer?
 

McBell

Unbound
When and where did the first living creation, NeverHappenedASaurus, come into being?
What composed its protective layer?
Is it possible to be totally partial?
What's another word for thesaurus?
What do you do when you see an endangered animal that eats only endangered plants?
Do hungry crows have ravenous appetites?
If a parsley farmer is sued, can they garnish his wages?
Is it true that cannibals don't eat clowns because they taste funny?
If you're cross-eyed and have dyslexia, can you read all right?
 

SavedByTheLord

Well-Known Member
Is it possible to be totally partial?
What's another word for thesaurus?
What do you do when you see an endangered animal that eats only endangered plants?
Do hungry crows have ravenous appetites?
If a parsley farmer is sued, can they garnish his wages?
Is it true that cannibals don't eat clowns because they taste funny?
If you're cross-eyed and have dyslexia, can you read all right?
False analogies shows lack of logic.

How did the first living creature control osmosis and diffusion?
 

Mock Turtle

Oh my, did I say that!
Premium Member
I have proven the Bible true. If you wish to make the case for Islam or Hinduism, pro or con, go ahead.

You can post a thread or 2.
No you haven't proven anything to be true. This is purely in your mind. Try framing your arguments to the experts in their various fields and they will laugh at you - just as many do to all YEC believers and the many doing so on RF. If you wanted an even more ludicrous belief you could have a flat Earth too. We had one quite recently but he didn't last long here, and he was equally as adamant, and deluded, as yourself.
 

SavedByTheLord

Well-Known Member
No you haven't proven anything to be true. This is purely in your mind. Try framing your arguments to the experts in their various fields and they will laugh at you - just as many do to all YEC believers and the many doing so on RF. If you wanted an even more ludicrous belief you could have a flat Earth too. We had one quite recently but he didn't last long here, and he was equally as adamant, and deluded, as yourself.
Obviously you cannot refute it .
 
Top