Another irrefutable proof that God created all things using mathematical induction. And a proof that The Bible is the word of God.

[Subduction Zone]

That is interesting.

The answers to ERV's by the science denying AiG crowd are truly hilarious.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

The answers to ERV's by the science denying AiG crowd are truly hilarious.

How does the ERV's help the evolutionists case?

 

[Subduction Zone]

How does the ERV's help the evolutionists case?

They form the only valid "odds argument" to date. But then you probably have no clue as to what ERV's are.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

They form the only valid "odds argument" to date. But then you probably have no clue as to what ERV's are.

You mean as in this

Switching Sides: How Endogenous Retroviruses Protect Us from Viral Infections - PMC

Long disregarded as junk DNA or genomic dark matter, endogenous retroviruses (ERVs) have turned out to represent important components of the antiviral immune response. These remnants of once-infectious retroviruses not only regulate cellular immune ...

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

 

[Subduction Zone]

You mean as in this

Switching Sides: How Endogenous Retroviruses Protect Us from Viral Infections - PMC

Long disregarded as junk DNA or genomic dark matter, endogenous retroviruses (ERVs) have turned out to represent important components of the antiviral immune response. These remnants of once-infectious retroviruses not only regulate cellular immune ...

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

That article is about how our bodies have evolved to use the genetic information about ERV's. It does not support them being anything else than viruses that were from an infected gamete where the virus did not trigger properly.

 

[paarsurrey]

You mean as in this

Switching Sides: How Endogenous Retroviruses Protect Us from Viral Infections - PMC

Long disregarded as junk DNA or genomic dark matter, endogenous retroviruses (ERVs) have turned out to represent important components of the antiviral immune response. These remnants of once-infectious retroviruses not only regulate cellular immune ...

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

" 1 … I declare unto you the gospel which I preached unto you… 2 By which also ye are saved... … how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures; 4 And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures: - 1 Cor 15:1-4 For I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ: for it is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth ... Rom 1:16
30 … Sirs, what must I do to be saved? 31 And they said, Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved… - Acts 16:30-31 8 For by grace are ye saved through faith; … it is the gift of God: 9 Not of works, ... - Eph 2:8-9 "

None of the above is from Jesus/Yeshua- the truthful Israelite Messiah, please, right?
Why not prefer to follow Jesus/Yeshua- the truthful Israelite Messiah, please?

Right?

Regards

 

[SavedByTheLord]

That article is about how our bodies have evolved to use the genetic information about ERV's. It does not support them being anything else than viruses that were from an infected gamete where the virus did not trigger properly.

" 1 … I declare unto you the gospel which I preached unto you… 2 By which also ye are saved... … how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures; 4 And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures: - 1 Cor 15:1-4 For I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ: for it is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth ... Rom 1:16
30 … Sirs, what must I do to be saved? 31 And they said, Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved… - Acts 16:30-31 8 For by grace are ye saved through faith; … it is the gift of God: 9 Not of works, ... - Eph 2:8-9 "

None of the above is from Jesus/Yeshua- the truthful Israelite Messiah, please, right?
Why not prefer to follow Jesus/Yeshua- the truthful Israelite Messiah, please?

Right?

Regards

Because the word of God is true and say that Christ, the Word which was God, became flesh and was crucified for our sins, buried and rose again the 3rd day according to the scripture.

 

[paarsurrey]

paarsurrey said:
" 1 … I declare unto you the gospel which I preached unto you… 2 By which also ye are saved... … how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures; 4 And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures: - 1 Cor 15:1-4 For I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ: for it is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth ... Rom 1:16
30 … Sirs, what must I do to be saved? 31 And they said, Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved… - Acts 16:30-31 8 For by grace are ye saved through faith; … it is the gift of God: 9 Not of works, ... - Eph 2:8-9 "

None of the above is from Jesus/Yeshua- the truthful Israelite Messiah, please, right?
Why not prefer to follow Jesus/Yeshua- the truthful Israelite Messiah, please?

Right?

Because the word of God is true and say that Christ, the Word which was God, became flesh and was crucified for our sins, buried and rose again the 3rd day according to the scripture.

But even the above is not from Jesus /Yeshua- the truthful Israelite Messiah, please, right?
Can others make Jesus what Jesus never claimed to be himself, please, right??

Regards

 

[Subduction Zone]

Because the word of God is true and say that Christ, the Word which was God, became flesh and was crucified for our sins, buried and rose again the 3rd day according to the scripture.

You would have to prove that claim and you never have. If anything that claim has been continually refuted here. But repeating it now without any support you are just telling the whole world that you are wrong.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

You would have to prove that claim and you never have. If anything that claim has been continually refuted here. But repeating it now without any support you are just telling the whole world that you are wrong.

Of course I did.

Where are the pop 3 stars?
The James Webb Telescope is no looking into the early history of the universe and they are still missing?
Not only that but there is an abundance of heavy elements in the early universe, especially nickel.
The Big Bang is dead.
Now what?

 

[McBell]

Now what?

The same old song and dance you have been diligently performing from get go.

You make bold empty claim.
You are asked to support your bold empty c;aim.
You make even more bold empty claims in "support" of your bold empty claim
Someone takes the time to show how your bold empty claim is nothing more than a huge steamy pile of bovine feces.
You bear false witness and ask a bunch of questions that have absolutely nothing to do with the topic you just got your arse handed to you over.

 

[ratiocinator]

Of course I did.

You have proved nothing at all here (aside from your own ignorance of science, logic, and mathematics).

The Big Bang is dead.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Of course I did.

Where are the pop 3 stars?
The James Webb Telescope is no looking into the early history of the universe and they are still missing?
Not only that but there is an abundance of heavy elements in the early universe, especially nickel.
The Big Bang is dead.
Now what?

No, you didn't. You keep forgetting how you lost all of those debates.

And when you ask foolish and ignorant questions you only reveal how little that you know and how desperate you are.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

No, you didn't. You keep forgetting how you lost all of those debates.

And when you ask foolish and ignorant questions you only reveal how little that you know and how desperate you are.

I have already proven evolution and billions of years false.
And I have already proven that God created all things in 6 days about 6000 years just like the Bible says.
Not only is the Big Bang a Big Fraud but abiogenesis is false,

What was the first living creature and what features did it have?

 

[McBell]

I have already proven evolution and billions of years false.

Nope.
not even close.

And I have already proven that God created all things in 6 days about 6000 years just like the Bible says.

Nope.
not even close.

Not only is the Big Bang a Big Fraud but abiogenesis is false,

Nope.
not even close.

What was the first living creature and what features did it have?

Stanley
It seems the single celled organism known as Stanley has a higher IQ than most creationists.

 

[ratiocinator]

I have already proven evolution and billions of years false.
And I have already proven that God created all things in 6 days about 6000 years just like the Bible says.

You really haven't. All you've proved on here is that you don't understand how to prove things or, indeed, what sort of things can be proved.

All your supposed 'proofs' were easily refuted. Just ignoring the responses you had and blindly insisting you've proved what you clearly haven't is just making you look stupid. Is that what you really want?

 

[SavedByTheLord]

You really haven't. All you've proved on here is that you don't understand how to prove things or, indeed, what sort of things can be proved.

All your supposed 'proofs' were easily refuted. Just ignoring the responses you had and blindly insisting you've proved what you clearly haven't is just making you look stupid. Is that what you really want?

I did and of course no one has refuted any of them nor met the simple challenge I gave.

 

[ratiocinator]

I did and of course no one has refuted any of them nor met the simple challenge I gave.

I guess you can keep telling yourself that, but it will remain false out here in the real world....

 

[McBell]

I did and of course no one has refuted any of them nor met the simple challenge I gave.

Pretty much everything you have said has been so thoroughly refuted so many times that everyone is pretty much bored with you.

 

[Subduction Zone]

I have already proven evolution and billions of years false.
And I have already proven that God created all things in 6 days about 6000 years just like the Bible says.
Not only is the Big Bang a Big Fraud but abiogenesis is false,

What was the first living creature and what features did it have?

No, you never did that. You only "proved" that your scientific and reasoning capabilities are still at the elementary school level.

And you just proved your lack of education and inability to reason once again.