Just making up stories now and passing off as evidence.
Oh, sorry I didn't tell you, I peer-reviewed my post.
The millions of missing chains of missing links are all still missing in the fossil record.
So what? We also have actual fossil records, especially the hominid line we come from.
For the first, four million years or so of hominin evolution, the hominin fossil record is characterized by, among other trends, canine reduction and postcranial metamorphosis in the following genera:
Sahelanthropus,
Orrorin,
Ardipithecus,
Australopithecus, and
Paranthropus. As the Pliocene epoch came to a close and global climate was shifting at about 2.5 million years ago (deMenocal
2004), there is a concomitant change in the hominin fossil record. In this increasingly cooler world, something new, both anatomically and behaviorally, emerged. This is the origin of the genus
Homo.
"Scientists say that only one in a thousand species that have ever lived survives today. The other
99.9 percent are extinct, gone forever. "
"The fossil record is our history book of Earth’s extinct species. "
And there are no partially developed organs in living things today.
That's because evolution is real. There are never "partially developed organs"? Evolution doesn't slowly create organisms until they are finished? That would be more like if a creator was making people. But we don't see that.
Evolution didn't provide us with a partial arm in anticipation of a fully developed arm down the road. We didn't sprout a bicep, then a forearm, and finally a hand to complete our limbs. Genetics just doesn't work that way. If an organism doesn't have any limbs to begin with, it's not going to create a monstrosity with a partial human limb. Evolution only works incrementally, and every step has to be functional, or else the organism won't survive to reproduce.
But while everything is functioning, it also often barely just gets the job done enough for us to survive and reproduce, it doesn't care as much about perfecting parts unless it plays a role in evolution.
Cataracts, flimsy ACLs, the inability to clear lactic acid from muscles faster than it builds up, ear infections in babies, sprained ankles, detrimental buildup of body fat, stubby fingers, clumsiness, detrimentally large breasts, early onset male pattern baldness, baldness in women, diabetes, cancer, general ugliness, funny voices, snoring,
This is not an argument against evolution. It's a point that creationists who never studied evolution at all think makes sense. It's actually the opposite.
So, macroevolution is not happening and has not happened in the past.
Humans are great apes morphologically, behaviorally and genetically we are great apes. We evolved from other hominids. The fossil record shows this, our genetics show this, our behavior and bodies show this.
I'm still waiting for the evidence that shows evolution and a 5 billion year old earth is false.
And the genetics stops all jumps.
No we have very similar genetics to our other ape ancestors.
So evolution is false and the billions of years speculation is falsified also.
You still haven't produced any evidence to either? Please provide evidence that proves evolution is false and also evidence to explain why we see fossils, genetics and all evidence in favor of evolution, even though it's false. You have to also explain why we see that.
Then you need evidence for a young earth and you have to explain radio dating and other things that show an old earth.
Erosion
Geochronology
Geochronology is the science of determining the
absolute age of rocks, fossils, and sediments by a variety of techniques. These methods indicate that the Earth as a whole is about 4.54 billion years old, and that the strata that, according to flood geology, were laid down during the Flood some 6,000 years ago, were actually deposited gradually over many millions of years.
Physics
Dating
Ancient rocks exceeding 3.5 billion years in age are found on all of Earth's continents. The oldest rocks on Earth found so far are the Acasta Gneisses in northwestern Canada near Great Slave Lake (4.03 Ga) and the Isua Supracrustal rocks in West Greenland (3.7 to 3.8 Ga), but well-studied rocks nearly as old are also found in the Minnesota River Valley and northern Michigan (3.5-3.7 billion years), in Swaziland (3.4-3.5 billion years), and in Western Australia (3.4-3.6 billion years). [See Editor's Note.] These ancient rocks have been dated by a number of radiometric dating methods and the consistency of the results give scientists confidence that the ages are correct to within a few percent. An interesting feature of these ancient rocks is that they are not from any sort of "primordial crust" but are lava flows and sediments deposited in shallow water, an indication that Earth history began well before these rocks were deposited. In Western Australia, single zircon crystals found in younger sedimentary rocks have radiometric ages of as much as 4.3 billion years, making these tiny crystals the oldest materials to be found on Earth so far. The source rocks for these zircon crystals have not yet been found. The ages measured for Earth's oldest rocks and oldest crystals show that the Earth is at least 4.3 billion years in age but do not reveal the exact age of Earth's formation. The best age for the Earth (4.54 Ga) is based on old, presumed single-stage leads coupled with the Pb ratios in troilite from iron meteorites, specifically the Canyon Diablo meteorite. In addition, mineral grains (zircon) with U-Pb ages of 4.4 Ga have recently been reported from sedimentary rocks in west-central Australia. The Moon is a more primitive planet than Earth because it has not been disturbed by plate tectonics; thus, some of its more ancient rocks are more plentiful. Only a small number of rocks were returned to Earth by the six Apollo and three Luna missions. These rocks vary greatly in age, a reflection of their different ages of formation and their subsequent histories. The oldest dated moon rocks, however, have ages between 4.4 and 4.5 billion years and provide a minimum age for the formation of our nearest planetary neighbor. Thousands of meteorites, which are fragments of asteroids that fall to Earth, have been recovered. These primitive objects provide the best ages for the time of formation of the Solar System. There are more than 70 meteorites, of different types, whose ages have been measured using radiometric dating techniques. The results show that the meteorites, and therefore the Solar System, formed between 4.53 and 4.58 billion years ago. The best age for the Earth comes not from dating individual rocks but by considering the Earth and meteorites as part of the same evolving system in which the isotopic composition of lead, specifically the ratio of lead-207 to lead-206 changes over time owing to the decay of radioactive uranium-235 and uranium-238, respectively. Scientists have used this approach to determine the time required for the isotopes in the Earth's oldest lead ores, of which there are only a few, to evolve from its primordial composition, as measured in uranium-free phases of iron meteorites, to its compositions at the time these lead ores separated from their mantle reservoirs. These calculations result in an age for the Earth and meteorites, and hence the Solar System, of 4.54 billion years with an uncertainty of less than 1 percent. To be precise, this age represents the last time that lead isotopes were homogeneous througout the inner Solar System and the time that lead and uranium was incorporated into the solid bodies of the Solar System. The age of 4.54 billion years found for the Solar System and Earth is consistent with current calculations of 11 to 13 billion years for the age of the Milky Way Galaxy (based on the stage of evolution of globular cluster stars) and the age of 10 to 15 billion years for the age of the Universe (based on the recession of distant galaxies).
Most importantly, make sure you peer-review it all as well. I mean, it needs to be peer-reviewed by a scientist panel who are in the field, but of course your peer-review is also needed.
