Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Check six – Amplifying BrainsI´ve skimmed your profile link and I´ve just a question of your mathematical skills in astrophysics and cosmology?
Well, according to the OP in this thread, you even shouldn´t have replied here.I've never heard of any Maverick mathematicians - nor any Rawhide or Bonanza mathematicians either.
Thanks for the obvious requestWhy don't our "great" resident mathematicians and cosmologists etc engage seriously as challenged by the OP, please?
Regards
I´ve skimmed your profile link and I´ve just a question of your mathematical skills in astrophysics and cosmology?
Please keep us posted as to what both sides do "inside the box".I think outside the box. And....what I think is: I'd like to get inside the box again.
Not do be rude, but I wouldn't search for mathematician and theoretical physicists in a place call "religious forum". Have you ever tried to o to your local university department of physics or mathematics and see who holds chairs there?
So no it's not specifically about dull, comprehensive astrophysics and cosmology, but it's about what we can do with it
Okay, then....I want think inside the box for the first time (since I have probably never been in it the first time).Please keep us posted as to what both sides do "inside the box".
And by the way, is it really "again", please?
What was the subject of discussion "inside the box" last time, please?
Right, please?
Regards
It is like Star Trek, but only with mainstream science.That would fall more in the category of speculative science fiction like Star Trek for example or Alien Worlds.
The creation at large cannot be put on equations at all as it´s a cyclical and evolving motion. Maths can´t even be fully credible when measuring a wooden board which constantly changes its lenght when heated and cooled.A little question, please.
Does Mathematics even exist in nature, please?
If yes, who taught it to nature, please?
Right friends, please?
This OP of *Maverick Mathematician* thread has evolved to be the the pure farce where *black boxes thinkers* have taken over and simply ignoring the very OP.
And it all becomes a pathetical circus when even RF Staff Members are ignoring the OP and deriving everyting with irrelevant nonsense.
Don´t RF have any ordinary Forum rules to follow?
Under all circumstances you´ll have to excuse me, I´m only DanishThey're hopeless. Particularly the colonials who aren't using the Queen's English, they keep saying "math" instead of "maths".
It doesn't impact one's calculations of "Maths." even if it is spelt "Math", please.They're hopeless. Particularly the colonials who aren't using the Queen's English, they keep saying "math" instead of "maths".
I take it you mean the equations of physics generally, no?I wonder if all astrophysical and cosmological mathematicians just are able to work with consensus approaches in these scientific areas
It sounds like you have some pet hypothesis that the physics departments think is wrong.
Is that right? What's the actual topic you have in mind?