Goodness, gracious...you do like to play the contrarian.No I didn't. I clarified it. I never said you were wrong.
Which was my entire point in my initial post. You just like to argue and take offense when none was intended. Here's what I wrote.
Bunker c is too viscous to be regulated. The engines are usually started on something close to diesel and then switched over when away from port and the rpms are right. It's a formal process. The bunker oil injectors I'm familiar with are run full open. Since these have horrible fumes for most of us, they are not run on bunker fuel in or near port, but on a much, much lighter fuel that runs much cleaner and the engine speed can actually be regulated. I actually have been on ships as an engineer, but not on one that big. I've been on those ships as a guest and have been in their engine rooms. I use plugs and muffs to mitigate the noise on the ships I crewed on, but these was stupid loud. They weren't even on bunker c and I was cringing the whole time. Gawd, but they are loud. You feel the detonation through your whole being. It was bone rattling in the worst way. The bunker c lines are stupid big too, but then they have to be.
A real engineer wouldn't have challenged its being a "diesel", because we think of its thermodynamic
cycle rather than the fuel name. Do you recall from your thermodynamics courses what characterizes it?
If you're not familiar with this particular engine, it's best to not say too much about its flex fuel usage.