In all the past scriptures is there any time a Messenger came after the tribulations and everyone then accepted a Messenger?
My take on the history is that God always gives us the chance of embracing change, and when the majority reject, fair warning is part of the Message.
Regards Tony
One thing, no matter what the past scriptures said, it usually isn't taken literal by Baha'is. Does Kalki come and destroy the wicked? Does the Messiah? Does Maitreya? Does Jesus? It sounds like things get bad, real bad, and that's when the "Lord" comes and fixes. You got some scripture verses that have it the other way?
Oh, and God, if he's for real, should know we're not going to listen to some guy claiming to be sent by God. And how many people have listened to some guy, and he turns out to be some crackpot? Like I'm totally sure that all the leaders Baha'u'llah sent letters to were going to think he was a messenger from God. A few plagues. An earthquake or two, then maybe they would have believed. And God did that before. Why not this time?
Oh yeah, he probably didn't do that before. The story about the plagues was probably fictional and meant to be symbolic. So, we have nothing. No proof. Just a man's word, "I am from God?" Ah, but there was proof. Most of them lost their rulership. Amazing! What a prophecy! No, eventually all of them would have lost their rulership. Ah, but will there be plagues? Yes, God is going to do that. But not to those rulers during his time. To us. Wars and more wars. More pandemics. More natural disasters. Until, like Pharoah, we give in and say, "Surely, this Baha'u'llah was from God."
Gee, thanks God. Is killing and torturing people the only way you have to prove your existence? But, if those bad things continue after all people have given in to his will, then what? Was it really God? Or just that people fight, and plagues and natural disasters happen?