Father Heathen
Veteran Member
Which ones in particular, and can you provide examples?A Christian believer? Of course--skeptics don't honor even half of the Ten Commandments!
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Which ones in particular, and can you provide examples?A Christian believer? Of course--skeptics don't honor even half of the Ten Commandments!
Typically believers tend to concern themselves with other people's "sins" rather than their own.
It's not bigotry, but rather an astute observation.Some believers think that non-believers concern themselves with other peoples "sins" than their own. People think many things just like you but those things are just bigotry.
It's not bigotry, but rather an astute observation.
Thanks." Tenets"
The study I read concluded that it was the extremes that were most likely to live moral lives -- those deeply devoted to their religion, and atheists. It was the nominally religious that tended to make excuses as to it being okay for them to act immorally.In another thread, someone shared their opinion to me.
A "believer" is less likely to r*** / assault his wife was the opinion.
Tell me your opinion. In general, is a believer less likely to "sin" or act immorally?
Atheists are proportionately underrepresented in American prisons
Where do you get the statistics from? Whats the research method? Can you provide the statistics and the causation analysis?
...Do you suppose all the paedophile priests
don't believe?...
...
Your idea is awful simplistic.
But they might be looking at porn or abusing their spouse.
Goes to show the (general) irrelevance of religion in morality.But not in the prisons of other countries (for example UK), where the irreligious tend to be slightly overrepresented
If that were true, the Catholic Church wouldn't have its predator priest scandal.I think everyone believes in something. So, this depends on, what believer. If person believes what Jesus said, he probably doesn't rape/assault.
Which ones in particular, and can you provide examples?
So your claim is that no Christian ever commits adultery, and that no non-Christian has any moral objection towards it?The decalogue of Exodus 20. Skeptics don't honor the Sabbath, are free to commit adultery, covet, lie, etc.
My opinion is they were trolling, and pretty poorly at that, since there is abundant research to falsify the theistic canard that atheist are less moral. As an atheist I also don't revere a book or worship a deity depicted in it, that endorses and encourages rape.In another thread, someone shared their opinion to me.
A "believer" is less likely to r*** / assault his wife was the opinion.
Tell me your opinion. In general, is a believer less likely to "sin" or act immorally?
Yes, while far from being sinless a believer is going to be making an effort to avoid a lot of sin that a non believer is going to be normalizing.
E.g. Muslims don’t do a lot of drinking.
It depends on what one "believes", of course. But in the end one's "belief" doesn't matter much. It won't really stop anyone from "sinning" because "sin" is in the desire, not the act. Wanting to cheat on your wife is a sin whether you cheat on your wife or not. And what you "believe" about it doesn't change that fact, or stop that sinful desire.
From my personal experience, it isn't that we don't sin but I certainly have exponentially reduced it Assuming I am normal and eliminating the outlying anomalies, probably "yes". (No statistical support for my viewpoint other than "me")
Prisons are full of believers.
The decalogue of Exodus 20. Skeptics don't honor the Sabbath, are free to commit adultery, covet, lie, etc.