Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Accepting things as possible,
in no way means you end up 'believing' any of it.
Where is Martin? I was not done discussing with him. My question still stands: Where did God come from?
I dont know your religion but I can say this Jesus did not use crystal's to heal nor does he need to use them now. Furthermore Christians do not need crystal's to get healing or anything. Healing power is in the shed blood of Jesus Christ and his finished work on calvary's cross.
I think you need to tell Martin that. It seems he believes in God because he can't disprove God...
CWC did touch on one negative aspect that I can see with the decline of traditional religions: there are a myriad of cults and new age charlatans springing up in their place. When I first stumbled across this thread, my first thoughts were 'this can't be serious,' why would anyone in this day and age believe that crystals have healing powers?Just a heads up. Proselytizing is not allowed on the forum/s.
Afterthought: Jesus did use mud to heal.
What do you have as evidence of "Earth Magic"?
lol, it's not a crystal that keeps me coming back. It's that I love debate where my opponents use logical fallacies. Makes my position very easy to defend.
Here's some fodder for you to work with:
1. Crystals must contain magic because they seem so amazing that it is impossible for them to be just pieces of rock. Ad ignorantium
2. The human mind cannot understand crystals therefore we cannot detect the magic scientifically. Argument from Personal Incredulity
3. The belief that some people have for the magic of crystals protects us from their hidden powers. If no one believed in and thus tamed this power the crystal magic would overpower us all. Argument from final Consequences
- of course there is some truth in each of these examples.
You have explained God.
well it's abiding by the saying - 'just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they're not after you'
- so this concept of refutation by writing something off as a logical fallacy is in fact a logical fallacy itself!
We can never know with 100% certainty the existence or non-existence of God or spiritual forces - hence me saying that there is some truth in each of those examples.
We can disprove concepts of God that are logically inconsistent, or that fail to match up with evidence. Beyond that, we can prove that such ideas are redundant and pointless (Laplace's "I have no need for that hypothesis").We can never know with 100% certainty the existence or non-existence of God or spiritual forces - hence me saying that there is some truth in each of those examples.
I very much doubt you understand what a logical fallacy is, in that case.well it's abiding by the saying - 'just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they're not after you'
- so this concept of refutation by writing something off as a logical fallacy is in fact a logical fallacy itself!
Argument from incredulity.We can never know with 100% certainty the existence or non-existence of God or spiritual forces - hence me saying that there is some truth in each of those examples.
My goodness. How does your brain actually work like this?