Go Habs!
I wish! Not a good game tonight. I was a Habs fan in youth, for odd reasons. You are too I see.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Go Habs!
Hmm don't people ask questions all the time on the forums?
O.k. but then you could say there aren't individual emanations or something, who knows, there are different opinions on the thread for example.
I emanate you!
No. I am curious about things such as how a TV series finished when cancelled, or why people choose a certain name to their children. That is curiosity.
I feel a powerful drive to attempt to read and understand people, their values and their motivations.
That is not just idle curiosity, but rather a necessary concession to the logical consequences of my worldview. People are significant, therefore so are their beliefs, and so are the odds of their accuracy, and also the means by which they reached those beliefs.
How else could I possibly deal with them?
So has the discussion been helpful in any way?
Of course. To paraphrase: (Gita IV:24)
Brahman is the offerer. Brahman is thing offered. Brahman is the act of offering. Brahman is the fire in which the offering's burnt.
We have to live in the world we perceive; we have to treat our current level of consciousness as reality even if we understand intellectually that it's maya.
I believe the world is real. I believe the world is illusion. Reality is different in different levels of consciousness. The correct answer to a question changes when answered from different metaphysical levels.
My "ego self," as you say, has created my world. Someday my ego self will transcend that world, though; merge with it, absorb it, expand beyond it.
My current ego self has not, thus far, chosen to make a God. I'm aware that some people do make Gods, and for them those Gods can be (subjectively) real. Someday, though, these people will become their Gods, then transcend them, absorb them and continue to expand beyond them.
In third state their Gods are real. In fifth or sixth state they are not. The reality of Gods -- or teapots -- depends on which level we are asking or answering from.
Yes, actually there have been some great answers to the OP.
O.k. but then you could say there aren't individual emanations or something, who knows, there are different opinions on the thread for example.
Hinduism, I think, has a difficulty simply because it recognises that there are great differences among individual seekers and their needs and thus has many upayas (paths or methods) and corresponding knowledge, called darsana (the seen).
None of those 'darsanas' are absolute truths. Yet, all darsana-s are tied together by one understanding "What is in consciousness is true, since Consciousness is True".
I see. Thanks for that explanation.
Thanks for appreciating. I wished to add that 'The Consciousness' and 'The Being' go together.
Firstly so far it has been established that 'Hinduism' is a 'way of life' , a culture that includes followers of all religionsWhy would anybody who is not a Hindu want to know if Hindu Gods are real or not? That's puzzling.
Besides, there is no doubt that 'God' is a concept which is used for an understanding and any 'deity' is representational of IT even the 'form' that each one is, IS also representative of THAT concept."Hinduism" or "Hindutva" are not necessarily to be understood and construed narrowly, confined only to the strict Hindu religious practices unrelated to the culture and ethos of the People of India depicting the way of life of the Indian people. Unless the context of a speech indicates a contrary meaning or use, in the abstract, these terms are indicative more of a way of life of the Indian people. Unless the context of a speech indicates a contrary meaning or use, in the abstract, these terms are indicative more of a way of life of the Indian people and are not confined merely to describe persons practicing the Hindu religion as a faith" (Emphasis supplied). This clearly means that, by itself, the word "Hinduism" or "Hindutva" indicates the culture of the people of India as a whole, irrespective of whether they are Hindus, Muslims, Christians, Jews etc.
Friend Vinayaka,
Firstly so far it has been established that 'Hinduism' is a 'way of life' , a culture that includes followers of all religions.
Besides, there is no doubt that 'God' is a concept which is used for an understanding and any 'deity' is representational of IT even the 'form' that each one is, IS also representative of THAT concept.
Sorry, forgot the source which is the Supreme Court of India's judgement available at:Where, when, and by whom?
Friend atanu,
Sorry, forgot the source which is the Supreme Court of India's judgement available at:
Supreme court judgment: a blow to secular democracy.
Love & rgds
When we think of the Hindu religion, we find it difficult, if not impossible, to define Hindu religion or even adequately describe it. Unlike other religions in the world, the Hindu religion does not claim any one prophet; it does not worship any one God; it does not subscribe to any one dogma; it does not believe in any one philosophic concept; it does not follow any one set of religious rites or performances; in fact, it does not appear to satisfy the narrow traditional features of any religion of creed. It may broadly be described as a way of life and nothing more.
"From the high spiritual flights of the Vedanta philosophy, of which the latest discoveries of science seem like echoes, to the low ideas of idolatry with its multiflavour, mythology, the agnosticism of the Buddhists and the atheism of the Jains, each and all have a place in the Hindu's religion...
I love Krishna but I don't even think he really excited which doesn't worry me at all.