Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I think it is probably made up from a mixture of all those componenents - and maybe others. Sex is taboo enough without having to try and understand what feels totally incomprehensible to society. I would love to write more, but my bed is calling to me..........Pah said:What provides the motivation and thought process for the homophobic. Is it generic or, as Skinner says, a product of environment? If it is environmental, is the learning place a form of religious morality?
When a child is very young and comes across a poisonous snake they have no fear of that snake until they are taught to fear it either by experience or by education. I am not comparing homosexuals with snakes. The only comparison here is how fear is created.SoliDeoGloria said:why can't it be innate. Isn't everything else? What more could we want? Then the nose pickers and bed wetters and everybody else can say "hey, lighten up, I was born this way." So much for all that "free will" garbage, eh?
Sincerely,
SoliDeoGloria
Actually "nose picking" is inate - it goes along with infant facsination of his or her body. Bed wetting, I believe is a manifestation of environment.SoliDeoGloria said:why can't it be innate. Isn't everything else? What more could we want? Then the nose pickers and bed wetters and everybody else can say "hey, lighten up, I was born this way." So much for all that "free will" garbage, eh?
Sincerely,
SoliDeoGloria
Do you also think that homophobia, for some, is a reaction to homosexual urges? Would "social norms" created by religious dictates influence the revulsion that produces homophobia?Maize said:No. They are bred by fear, hatred, ignorance and a lack of compassion. No innocent child is born that way. They are taught to hate.
I cannot blame religion for this hate. Although people with anti-gay agendas will distort their religious doctrines to justify their homophobia, those same religions overwhelmingly teach love. But the homophobe has has so much hate in him and so little compassion, that message of love is lost.
In my opinion, in religious morality there is no room for hate. The person has already been taught that hate and fed lies, by their parents, friends, society... then they use their religion as an excuse for the hate and lies. Like that somehow makes it OK.
With all these exceptions to the whole philosophy of "free will", the next question then becomes where does "free will" apply? What I love about the subject matter is that it seems that the only time somebody wants to use the phrase "free will" is when they want to take credit for something they do but when they have a problem with something, all of a sudden it's innate and can't be helped. There seems to be more than a purely objective motive behind this subject matter. Comes across more like human pride to me.Actually "nose picking" is inate - it goes along with infant facsination of his or her body. Bed wetting, I believe is a manifestation of environment.
"Free will" doesn't seem to apply to homophobia - well, at least I can't imagine someone chosing to be hateful
I must confess that I love that answer!!!I cannot blame religion for this hate. Although people with anti-gay agendas will distort their religious doctrines to justify their homophobia, those same religions overwhelmingly teach love. But the homophobe has has so much hate in him and so little compassion, that message of love is lost.
In my opinion, in religious morality there is no room for hate. The person has already been taught that hate and fed lies, by their parents, friends, society... then they use their religion as an excuse for the hate and lies. Like that somehow makes it OK.
I don't doubt that to be true for one minute although I think we will see that starting to change if the social view of homosexuality keeps going the trend it is going. Like that old cliche goes "Give them an inch and they'll take a mile"Do you also think that homophobia, for some, is a reaction to homosexual urges? Would "social norms" created by religious dictates influence the revulsion that produces homophobia?
The only motive behind homophobia that is grounded in human nature is fear itself. And the only way you can become afraid of something is through experience or education IMO.standing_on_one_foot said:The motives behind it are grounded in human nature, so in that sense it's innate, but the specific manifestation certainly isn't innate, only the inclination. Anyways, people can change.
Do you have any children? I have four boys so let me give you an example. My oldest was deathly afraid of dirt when he was very young before he could even walk and it lasted for a while. No matter how much I try to tell my boys not to be afraid of lightning, they are still afraid of it. Can you explain that?When a child is very young and comes across a poisonous snake they have no fear of that snake until they are taught to fear it either by experience or by education. I am not comparing homosexuals with snakes. The only comparison here is how fear is created.
I think you know the answer to that question, Pah. Nobody is born a bigot. We all learn to hate from the people around us. Some people are just exceptional learners.Pah said:What provides the motivation and thought process for the homophobic. Is it generic or, as Skinner says, a product of environment? If it is environmental, is the learning place a form of religious morality?
Yes I do. You have a good point but I am assuming that your son didn't even know what dirt was until he experienced it for the first time and touched it. Were they afraid of lightning before or after they experienced it for the first time. I am going to guess that they were not afraid of lightning until they heard their first huge crash. How do you explain a childs curious nature to touch even the most dangerous of objects.SoliDeoGloria said:Do you have any children? I have four boys so let me give you an example. My oldest was deathly afraid of dirt when he was very young before he could even walk and it lasted for a while. No matter how much I try to tell my boys not to be afraid of lightning, they are still afraid of it. Can you explain that?
Sincerely,
SoliDeogloria
That is, of course, the politically correct (and even functionally correct) response, but I suspect that the truth is more nuanced. So, for example, while hate must be taught, we may be prediposed to some hatreds, rendering such hatreds easier to learn than others.Katzpur said:Nobody is born a bigot. We all learn to hate from the people around us.
Yes, that was rather the motive I was referring to. I see your point about not being afraid of something until you experience it (if I don't know it exists, I won't be afraid of it specifically, after all). But being afraid of what you don't understand once you've experienced it is about as human as ya get. I'm not saying homophobia's right, mind you. I'm just saying that it comes from human nature (like, basically, most things we do and feel). Not saying human nature's bad either, just that bad stuff can arise from it. Mind, what people do with their inclinations is up to them, so I'd say only the potential for homophobia's innate.turk179 said:The only motive behind homophobia that is grounded in human nature is fear itself. And the only way you can become afraid of something is through experience or education IMO.
I agree with you as far as that it might be human nature to fear something that they don't understand. Where as it is my point that if something is not understood, education and experience could be used to improve on the lack of understanding as well as being a factor of the lack of understanding in the first place.standing_on_one_foot said:Yes, that was rather the motive I was referring to. I see your point about not being afraid of something until you experience it (if I don't know it exists, I won't be afraid of it specifically, after all). But being afraid of what you don't understand once you've experienced it is about as human as ya get. I'm not saying homophobia's right, mind you. I'm just saying that it comes from human nature (like, basically, most things we do and feel). Not saying human nature's bad either, just that bad stuff can arise from it. Mind, what people do with their inclinations is up to them, so I'd say only the potential for homophobia's innate.
Wow, I was rambling. I can't quite remember my point now
Do you think so? Which ones do you think we're predisposed to?Jayhawker Soule said:That is, of course, the politically correct (and even functionally correct) response, but I suspect that the truth is more nuanced. So, for example, while hate must be taught, we may be prediposed to some hatreds, rendering such hatreds easier to learn than others.