mikkel_the_dane
My own religion
So just your belief.
I can cite the instances where science has proven religions wrong.
Yes, and therefore I can't believe in one them. Yet I do so. So there is a limit to that version of wrong.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
So just your belief.
I can cite the instances where science has proven religions wrong.
Ever since Man started to leave evidence of his existence other than his bones he has left artefacts that can be inteptetated as religious.
From ancient carvings to wall paintings.
Later as we became better at creating artefacts, monuments and buildings the evidence is overwhelming. Men were creating religions and gods.
So are modern religions more creations of Man. Or did gods wait 200,000 years to reveal itself to Man?
The oldest evidenced religion is Hinduism at around 15000 years
Present it then.There is more evidence they are false.
He was not the only real one. There have been many other real Messengers throughout the course of history.So everyone has to follow what your messenger says. Now prove your messenger is the only real one.
Present it then.The evidence is that man had religions. Not that they were creating. The valid assumption is that they were interpreting religion in their expressions, be it rituals or artefacts and art.
The way people know is by doing their own independent investigation of the religion I follow. That is the only way they can know for themselves.So some are made up by Man and some are not. How do we know you're not following one made up by Man? You believing isn't good enough for everyone.
I believe my Messenger is one of the real Messengers but I cannot prove that to anyone except myself.So prove your messenger is the real one. Just saying "I believe" can't convince everyone.
That's true, but you do not have to be conned if you follow the instructions of Jesus and look at their fruits.And there is the problem and for conmen an open opportunity.
That is for you to determine by looking at the claimants.With so many false religions, different religions, different gods, messengers, etc which one are we to follow?
I doubt that was God's aim, but God gave man free will so that is what happened.Revealing it to one at a time has caused so much war, confusion, genocide, destruction, etc. Is that gods aim?
There are a lot of charlatans but that does not mean there is no God.Or is there no god and just a lot of charlatans trying to con us?
That might be a flaw if all I had was mythology, superstition and loads of shaman to back me up.Here's the flaw in your debate.
Atheist have science, history, archaeologist and100,000s of scientists with proof to back them up. You have mythology, superstition and loads of shaman to back you up.
Biblical scientific errors - RationalWikiPresent it then.
Do you think I started out being an atheist? I was attending church regularly, in a Christian family, learn about religion in school. It was later when I learned about science that I saw the truth. That god didn't create the Earth and all in it, evolution did and it's still changing.The way people know is by doing their own independent investigation of the religion I follow. That is the only way they can know for themselves.
Of course my believing is not good enough, and it shouldn't be good enough, because people can believe all kinds of things that are not true.
Some or even most of what Jesus preached, or we are told he preached, is good. Beware of false prophets is great advice and I follow it. So far all have failed to convince me. For reasons I gave in my previous posts.That's true, but you do not have to be conned if you follow the instructions of Jesus and look at their fruits.
Matthew 7:15-20 Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves. Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles? Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit. A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit. Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire. Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them.
Fruits: the pleasant or successful result of work or actions: FRUIT | meaning in the Cambridge English Dictionary
No god that's written about. Of that, I'm certain because all the prophets get carried away with themself and end up spouting nonsense. They contradict each other, come up with crazy notions, con people, etc.That is for you to determine by looking at the claimants.
I doubt that was God's aim, but God gave man free will so that is what happened.
There are a lot of charlatans but that does not mean there is no God.
For 3,000 plus years it's been accepted that gods created the world and all the other nonsense. It's only recently we learned about Evolution, Archaeology, in-depth Science and the movement of people who don't believe word for word in what bibles say is growing.That might be a flaw if all I had was mythology, superstition and loads of shaman to back me up.
I also have proof, although it is not the proof you want.
Prove some of the other ones.He was not the only real one. There have been many other real Messengers throughout the course of history.
Referring to religions,Biblical scientific errors - RationalWiki
50,000 Errors and Biblical contradictions
The Problem of the Bible: Inaccuracies, contradictions, fallacies, scientific issues and more. | News24
Yes, there is a war between science and religion
Evolution myths: The theory is wrong because the Bible is 'inerrant'
Some Reasons Why Humanists Reject The Bible - American Humanist Association go down to
Contradictions
Humanists Challenge the Bible - Answers to Their Questions and Accusations
A Brief Summary of Why the Bible Is Unreliable
Some Reasons Why Humanists Reject The Bible
That should keep you busy for a while. Just Googled "Bible contradicts science" and "Bible contradicts itself"
Thanks for sharing your background. It helps me better understand where you are at.Do you think I started out being an atheist? I was attending church regularly, in a Christian family, learn about religion in school. It was later when I learned about science that I saw the truth. That god didn't create the Earth and all in it, evolution did and it's still changing.
Moses Myth
Adam Myth
Noah Myth
Abraham Myth
Sodom and Gomorrah real places but god didn't destroy them.
Job Myth
Egypt plagues = volcano eruption.
Wall os Jericho = earthquakes.
Jesus, no Son of god. A son of god would convince his critics and get off the cross.
A god wouldn't waste his time talking to nobodies in nobody tribes. He would go to the leaders of empires.
That's right. I do not have access to the Mind of God, so I do not know what God wants...No god that's written about. Of that, I'm certain because all the prophets get carried away with themself and end up spouting nonsense. They contradict each other, come up with crazy notions, con people, etc.
As I said in another thread. If there is a god this is what it wants. Because it has left us in a mess over religion for 1,000s of years. And you have no answer to that. Other than "I can't tell you what god wants!!!!"