These would be false numbers. It is not evidence, from the polls that this is true for all current Republicans, but only those sampled. Therefore, such wording is (clearly) erroneous. I would guess the number sampled isn't even 1% of all Republicans.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Are Republicans More Often Sheeple Compared to Democrats?
- Thread starter Nous
- Start date
These would be false numbers. It is not evidence, from the polls that this is true for all current Republicans, but only those sampled. Therefore, such wording is (clearly) erroneous. I would guess the number sampled isn't even 1% of all Republicans.
The way in which he wrote them are clearly fabricated. Glad I articulated why that is.
Seemingly not accurate.
Being a B, I'm yet to learn of one thing that really any group, but let's go with Progressives, have done for the B in LGBT. Can you name such a thing?
None of what is cited here has to do with B. Not to mention how erroneous the other inferences are.
Lighthouse
Well-Known Member
The mind authorities might come and arrest you for thinking for yourself, and not as they do. Many are intolerant to the fact you have your own mind.
The way I see that is whoever is in office gets scapegoated for any wars happening.
Well, it's one area where the prez has great authority.
So I blame whoever is in office for whatever wrongful war they start or continue.
I thought Obama helped get our troops back, or am I misremembering. Did they just send them to a different country or something? I say they cause it has to be Congress, the pres doesn't really have that much authority. Certainly not a single Senator.
Daemon Sophic
Avatar in flux
He took too long for me.
Marriage equality has not been achieved for bisexuals. When bisexuals can marry both of the genders they are attracted to at the same time, then you'd have a fair point. I'm thinking a bisexual would have very little problem fitting into the older version of military. Perhaps you can share a case (or 50) where a person that was only known as bisexual had issues with self identifying as bisexual and serving in the military.
I've honestly experienced more discrimination among homosexuals than heterosexuals. So, that nonsense doesn't fly with me. Is also why I'd rather not be lumped in with LG as a grouping, given some of their levels of discrimination, or even conversion.
I'll consider marrying someone of the same gender when we live in a society where I can marry someone of both genders at the same time. Until then, I will argue that marriage equality doesn't truly exist among consenting adults.
Yep, seriously. The link you provided was seeking things that strike me as unconcerned with bisexuality.
- The first item, doesn't make it even a little bit clear how it impacts bisexuals, but is bias from homosexual types that I'm extremely familiar with, and that I've already spoken to (in 2 spots) of this post
- I agree with the 2nd item on the Republican platform, and don't understand how it would impact a bisexual person
- Third item doesn't deal with bisexual people, nor is it worded as such
- And 4th one as well.
So, yeah, none of them. Seriously.
Augustus
…
You haven't explained why 'sheeple' is a better fit than 'normal people displaying normal cognitive functioning'.
You are also doing a great job of illustrating the point I was making about cognitive bias too
Thank you. This sort of "argument" that something is necessarily false because on account of source or speaker is logically fallacious--either an association fallacy or genetic fallacy.
It isn't reasonable for you to answer the question as to whether you've understood that one can't deduce an affirmative proposition from your absence of evidence? Why? Is that question too intellectually challenging for you?
You haven't quoted any of his words, or argued that he hasn't flip-flopped.
Is this to me? I don't recall asking you any such question.
Underhill
Well-Known Member
As apposed to...
Be sure to prove all of your claims here.
5. He who asserts must prove. In order to establish an assertion, the team must support it with enough evidence and logic to convince an intelligent but previously uninformed person that it is more reasonable to believe the assertion than to disbelieve it. Facts must be accurate. Visual materials are permissible, and once introduced, they become available for the opponents' use if desired.
http://homepage.ntu.edu.tw/~karchung/debate1.htm
I haven't made a claim about your airy-fairy ideas of "normal people displaying cognitive functioning." If you have any such argument to make about "normal people displaying normal cognitive functioning" related to the topic here, then be sure to substantiate your claims:
5. He who asserts must prove. In order to establish an assertion, the team must support it with enough evidence and logic to convince an intelligent but previously uninformed person that it is more reasonable to believe the assertion than to disbelieve it. Facts must be accurate. Visual materials are permissible, and once introduced, they become available for the opponents' use if desired.
http://homepage.ntu.edu.tw/~karchung/debate1.htm
Lighthouse
Well-Known Member
I don't wish to argue, minds change.
I really try not to make much or get overly excited about meaningless words.