Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
You can't follow a conversation. Don't blame others for your lack.First I claimed one existed and now I predicted one existed, lmao. When I clearly said that one does not exist. Hahaha.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
You can't follow a conversation. Don't blame others for your lack.First I claimed one existed and now I predicted one existed, lmao. When I clearly said that one does not exist. Hahaha.
That is not quite what the article says. There are fragments of text from that time. Far more than here is for Jesus.Aja source ?
There are no sources from people who know alexander (from Wikipedia)
You can't follow a conversation. Don't blame others for your lack.
You don't have to trust the goverment.But throughout the whole day, and throughout all of the suns positions in the sky, the sun reflection will always reach your feet, regardless of whether or not it’s dusk or dawn.
For the flat earth sun model:
View attachment 24849
I’m honestly still investigating to come to a definite conclusion of whether or not I think the earth is flat or round. I weigh the evidence from both sides but as of lately, everything that NASA/the government has been saying/posting for all of this time seems extremely sketchy to me.
Which other error?That is not quite what the article says. There are fragments of text from that time. Far more than here is for Jesus.
Did you address your other error yet?
Which other error?
Err . . . The Moon ONLY presents one side. That's why it wasn't until 1959 when the Russian space craft Luna went around the moon that the far side was first seen.Seeing the same face of the moon, at the same time, from the opposite side of the earth?
...
Err . . . The Moon ONLY presents one side. That's why it wasn't until 1959 when the Russian space craft Luna went around the moon that the far side was first seen.
.
.
Which other error?
Why is that a problem? If you get a globe and a ball that represents the Moon your error should be obvious to you.Let’s say that the moon is a quarter moon. How would it be possible for people in the usa and australia to be looking at the same exact quartermoon at the same exact time?
Why is that a problem? If you get a globe and a ball that represents the Moon your error should be obvious to you.
Is that what's shown in the two photos? Certainly doesn't look like it to me. In which case I don't care about your quarter moon. Hell, I don't care about your photos anyway, particularly after you posted that absurd picture of all the water on earth pooling in the southern hemisphere. What a god-awful silly claim.Let’s say that the moon is a quarter moon. How would it be possible for people in the usa and australia to be looking at the same exact quarter moon at the same exact time?
Is that what's shown in the two photos? Certainly doesn't look like it to me. In which case I don't care about your quarter moon. Hell, I don't care about your photos anyway with, particularly after you posted that absurd picture of all the water on earth pooling in the southern hemisphere. What a god-awful silly claim.
.
That is not quite what the article says. There are fragments of text from that time. Far more than here is for Jesus.
Hey, prove both photos weren't taken from your back yard. Until you can do that why should anyone care?People in the usa are located in a completely different area than the people in australia. The moon should not appear to the people in the usa as it does to the people in australia because the reflection of the sun’s light on the moon cannot create the same visual effect that it does for people in the usa as it does for the people in australia, at the same exact time.
It doesn't make me feel anything; however, it does show you know nothing about photography or the focal length of lenses.
I gave you a chance to figure it out and mentioned your error to @Bob the Unbeliever . You used the same standards for a king that you used for a supposedly magic man.
It doesn't make me feel anything; however, it does show you know nothing about photography or the focal length of lenses.
..
Now please. you know that is not true. I make my own share. But unlike you I own up to my errors.Anything that subduction zone does not agree with is an “error”, and nothing is true unless he says that it is.
Paul never saw Jesus. Though he probably did speak with people that knew him. Oddly he thought that he knew Jesus better than those that actually knew him. That indicates some mental illness on his part.We have writings from Paul that could be traced back to within a few years (or months) after the crusifixtion (which is better than
Then we have 4 biographies (gospels) and acts written within 1 generation after the event. Witnesses where still alive.
we have extra biblical sources within 100-150 years like tacitus Josephus, Clement etc.
And as a bonus we have houndrets of other sources written within 200-400 years after his death,
This is extraordinary evidence, no other Palestinian jew from ancient history has as much evidence for it's existance as Jesus did.
Take Caephas for example, he was the suprime priest during that time, he was the most important and powerfull Jew, and we just have a few sentences about him in the Bible and a few sentences in Josephus. .....and nobody is skeptical of his existance and nobody argues that we would expect to to have more evidence about him.
How many sources indicate that Jesus was a mythical non historical creature ? Zero.