Are there any Flat Earth believers here?

[Subduction Zone]

The moon is only 27% the size of the earth. Why does the moon look bigger from the earth than the earth does from the moon?

...

Take a toy car. Hold it up close to your face. Look at a semi across the street. Which one obscures more of your sight?

 

[Tazarah]

Now please. you know that is not true. I make my own share. But unlike you I own up to my errors.

Thank you for proving my point.

And no, you still claim that I said “that an arc exists” when I clearly said that an “arc should exist but does not.”

 

[Subduction Zone]

We are discussing the historical existance of Jesus, not whether if he used magic or not

Not to mention that Alexander was also described by ancient historiens as someone with magical powers

If you include the magical Jesus in the mix then you do not have enough evidence by far. For Jesus the man to exist does not take all that much in the way of evidence. To have a reliable belief in magical Jesus massive evidence is needed.

 

[Tazarah]

Take a toy car. Hold it up close to your face. Look at a semi across the street. Which one obscures more of your sight?

Is there anything in this photo that is obscuring the sight?

 

[Tazarah]

If you include the magical Jesus in the mix then you do not have enough evidence by far. For Jesus the man to exist does not take all that much in the way of evidence. To have a reliable belief in magical Jesus massive evidence is needed.

It’s crazy how people like you refuse to believe that Jesus was able to perform miracles, but are so quick to believe that humans evolved from fish.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Thank you for proving my point.

And no, you still claim that I said “that an arc exists” when I clearly said that an “arc should exist but does not.”

No matter how many times I explain your error to you you won't let yourself understand it. Everyone else that can read English sees what you did.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Is there anything in this photo that is obscuring the sight?

View attachment 24876

Wow, yes, the Moon.

 

[Subduction Zone]

It’s crazy how people like you refuse to believe that Jesus was able to perform miracles, but are so quick to believe that humans evolved from fish.

We have massive evidence for evolution. It requires no magic. You believe in magic which has never been reliably reported.

 

[Tazarah]

No matter how many times I explain your error to you you won't let yourself understand it. Everyone else that can read English sees what you did.

LOL well until you get somebody else to agree with you, you are wrong. Everyone that can read english sees that you misread what I said and that you are now trying to twist my words in order to keep yourself from looking like a fool.

 

[Subduction Zone]

LOL well until you get somebody else to agree with you, you are wrong. Everyone that can read english sees that you misread what I said and that you are now trying to twist my words in order to keep yourself from looking like a fool.

Oh my,. Still without a clue.
You cannot follow a simple line of logic. I don't think you will ever see your error. Just as you could not see your error in your fist post here.

Tell me is English your first language? I have seen this sort of problem by some that are not fluent in English.

 

[Tazarah]

Wow, yes, the Moon.

This is how the moon looks from earth:

How is it logically possible for the earth to appear smaller from the moon than the moon does from the earth, when the moon is only 27% the size of the earth? This has nothing to do with anything obscuring anything.

 

[Subduction Zone]

This is how the moon looks from earth:

View attachment 24877


How is it logically possible for the earth to appear smaller from the moon than the moon does from the earth, when the moon is only 27% the size of the earth? This has nothing to do with anything obscuring anything.

View attachment 24878

Different lenses.

 

[Subduction Zone]

https://www.quora.com/Why-does-the-...on-Earth-considering-the-Earth-is-much-bigger

 

[Tazarah]

Oh my,. Still without a clue.
You cannot follow a simple line of logic. I don't think you will ever see your error. Just as you could not see your error in your fist post here.

Tell me is English your first language? I have seen this sort of problem by some that are not fluent in English.

Yes, english is my first language.

I said: “the point between the two railways should form an arc — but it does not.”

You said: “you claimed that an arc exists.”

LOL!!!

 

[Subduction Zone]

Look how small the Moon is in this picture. They must have washed it in hot water:

 

[Subduction Zone]

Yes, english is my first language.

I said: “the point between the two railways should form an arc — but it does not.”

You said: “you claimed that an arc exists.”

LOL!!!

Sorry, you edited your response. That was not honest. You said something on the order of "If the Earth is a globe the point between the two railways should from an arc." At that point we can safely stop. We know that the Earth is a globe. What you said after that was besides the point. The problem is that a globe Earth makes not such prediction.



In fact you based that lunacy on this:

"10) The London and Northwestern Railway forms a straight line 180 miles long between London and Liverpool. The railroad’s highest point, midway at Birmingham station, is only 240 feet above sea-level. If the world were actually a globe, however, curving 8 inches per mile squared, the 180 mile stretch of rail would form an arc with the center point at Birmingham raising over a mile, a full 5,400 feet above London and Liverpool."

Again this post is nonsense. It tells us that you do not understand the concept of gravity at all.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Yes, english is my first language.

I said: “the point between the two railways should form an arc — but it does not.”

You said: “you claimed that an arc exists.”

LOL!!!

But you did. You are merely unable to reason logically. You keep forgetting that the Earth is round so that sort of error on your part is understandable.

 

[Tazarah]

Different lenses.

When dealing with objects as large as the moon and the earth, lens size should not matter. The moon is only 27% the size of the earth... and the distance between the earth and the moon is not great enough for the type of lens used to be an excuse.

From a given distance, something that is four times the diameters of something else will look four times bigger.

It is safe to assume that the distance from the surface of the Moon to the surface of the Earth is the same as the distance from the surface of the Earth to the surface of the Moon.

 

[Tazarah]

Sorry, you edited your response. That was not honest. You said something on the order of "If the Earth is a globe the point between the two railways should from an arc." At that point we can safely stop. We know that the Earth is a globe. What you said after that was besides the point. The problem is that a globe Earth makes not such prediction.



In fact you based that lunacy on this:

"10) The London and Northwestern Railway forms a straight line 180 miles long between London and Liverpool. The railroad’s highest point, midway at Birmingham station, is only 240 feet above sea-level. If the world were actually a globe, however, curving 8 inches per mile squared, the 180 mile stretch of rail would form an arc with the center point at Birmingham raising over a mile, a full 5,400 feet above London and Liverpool."

Again this post is nonsense. It tells us that you do not understand the concept of gravity at all.

When did I edit my post? LYING again lmfao.

You QUOTED me saying “it should form an arc, but DOES NOT”.

Then you said that I claimed an arc exists.

Did you forget that I have the screenshots? Why do you keep lying? Is it that important to you? You can’t just admit that you messed up?

Lmfao

 

[Subduction Zone]

When dealing with objects as large as the moon and the earth, lens size should not matter. The moon is only 27% the size of the earth... and the distance between the earth and the moon is not great enough for the type of lens used to be an excuse.

From a given distance, something that is four times the diameters of something else will look four times bigger.

It is safe to assume that the distance from the surface of the Moon to the surface of the Earth is the same as the distance from the surface of the Earth to the surface of the Moon.

LOL. Try again.