Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
How can you possibly be happy knowing this thing that makes you happy is making people suffer?
Not even close. I am not advocating for them doing that. I did not tell them to do that I am merely observing what they are doing right now and happy that their true nature is apparent. If they could successfully cover up their motives then they would be far more likely to cause even more damage.
Don't forget "Death to America" in Rashida Talibs little fiefdom.
You are misunderstanding the object of the schadenfreude. In this case it is being happy at the distress that the republican party is undergoing due to the unintended (?) consequence of their actions. It is not dismissing the suffering inflicted on the women of Arizona.
You said women suffering makes you smile.
And, "I don't trust the average citizen to make a sound decision." (post #38).
Ok, whatever suffering women are going through makes you smile as long as can potentially give your politician a chance at winning. Got it!
And you continue to distort. But that just indicates that you know that I am right that the Republicans are harming women. Which is why you support them so questionable.
why do you only talk about how an abortion law affects women? Don't you think men can also have babies? Try to be more inclusive.
Because they are the victims of those laws.
Men can have babies. Therefore, men can have abortions. But you don't care about men having their rights abolished, so you discriminate against them by treating them as nonexistent.
Yes, men can have babies. There was a woman that just proved that. Her fetus did not gestate in her uterus. Somehow the fertilized egg escaped. It was a proof of concept of the sort of procedure necessary for men to have babies. And if it got to be too much for them they ccould also have an abortion. This is not even something new. Here is an article from 1994 with an example of a woman that became pregnant by that method. For a cisman to do it the fertilized egg or whatever stage it was in would have to be planted in a man's abdomen.
Hahaha! A woman proved that men can have babies?Yes, men can have babies. There was a woman that just proved that. Her fetus did not gestate in her uterus. Somehow the fertilized egg escaped. It was a proof of concept of the sort of procedure necessary for men to have babies. And if it got to be too much for them they ccould also have an abortion. This is not even something new. Here is an article from 1994 with an example of a woman that became pregnant by that method. For a cisman to do it the fertilized egg or whatever stage it was in would have to be planted in a man's abdomen.
HOW TO GET A MAN PREGNANT (Published 1994)
www.nytimes.com
I noticed that if I want to impress a liberal, I have to speak nonsense. Works every time!
Yes, you really really really need to work on your reading comprehension. When you do not understand something you should ask questions politely and properly instead of being rude. Do you not even know what a "proof of concept" is?
I know what BS is, and you just shoveled a heaping pile of it at me.
But you have only ever impressed yourself. Oh noesss!!!
@Laniakea is a liberal!! By her own standards.
More breaking of the Ninth Commandment. Why am I not surprised.