• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Arkansas inflicts child abuse on its school children

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
False statement and Mary was young but anything but naive.
“And Mary said: “My soul magnifies the Lord, And my spirit has rejoiced in God my Savior. For He has regarded the lowly state of His maidservant; For behold, henceforth all generations will call me blessed. For He who is mighty has done great things for me, And holy is His name. And His mercy is on those who fear Him From generation to generation. He has shown strength with His arm; He has scattered the proud in the imagination of their hearts. He has put down the mighty from their thrones, And exalted the lowly. He has filled the hungry with good things, And the rich He has sent away empty. He has helped His servant Israel, In remembrance of His mercy, As He spoke to our fathers, To Abraham and to his seed forever.””
‭‭Luke‬ ‭1:46-55‬ ‭NKJV‬‬
LOL, claims that Mary was not naive, posts a verse that demonstrates that Mary was naive:facepalm:
 

McBell

Unbound
Then I guess we are done
How proud are you of this shallower than shallow "victory"?

Since the word is censored by the forum software, AND it is a rule violation to circumvent the automatic word censoring system...
The word is ****.
slu*
sl*t
s*ut
*lut

So now that the word has been presented in a manner that the only way you can deny knowing what word it is also makes you look dumber than a box or rocks, does that mean you lose?
If not, why not?
Double standard much?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
How proud are you of this shallower than shallow "victory"?



So now that the word has been presented in a manner that the only way you can deny knowing what word it is also makes you look dumber than a box or rocks, does that mean you lose?
If not, why not?
Double standard much?
No, no, no, no!!:eek::eek::eek:

That was not the word that I used. Mine was much more family friendly.
 
Last edited:

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Okay since people are curious I will post a video here. The offending word is in the title so I will use a spoiler:


EDIT: Oh! The title does not show up. Still leaving it in a spoiler.
 

McBell

Unbound
And I edited my quote.

I was surprised that a word that could get past TV sensors at the time of George Carlin's Seven Words would get autobotted here.
It is possible that it was in there by default and never removed...

I play a game called Fishing Planet and their censored word list is crazy stupid.
It also changes every word, regardless of length to "***"
The word "night" is censored.
So midnight comes out as ***
Which is annoying since nightcrawlers is one of the baits....


Many people thought my description of my first ever tarpon catch was hilarious.
My auto correct software kept changing "tarpon" to "tampon" and since tampon is in the list of censored words....
 
How proud are you of this shallower than shallow "victory"?

Since the word is censored by the forum software, AND it is a rule violation to circumvent the automatic word censoring system...
The word is ****.
slu*
sl*t
s*ut
*lut

So now that the word has been presented in a manner that the only way you can deny knowing what word it is also makes you look dumber than a box or rocks, does that mean you lose?
If not, why not?
Double standard much?
Are you sure? Are you answering for another member? That can’t be the correct word, Mary was a virgin so that doesn’t work. Naive was what another member said so that won’t work either. Raped? No, that doesn’t work either.
 

ecco

Veteran Member
False statement and Mary was young but anything but naive.
“And Mary said: “My soul magnifies the Lord, And my spirit has rejoiced in God my Savior. For He has regarded the lowly state of His maidservant; For behold, henceforth all generations will call me blessed. ...
‭‭Luke‬ ‭1:46-55‬ ‭NKJV‬‬


What's false? That I said she was naive? She was just as naive as any of Weinsteins conquests. Additionally, she was indoctrinated since birth, as were most people in her tribe, to believe in gods and angels.

Was she too young to give consent? Well, for those folks the "age of consent" was anything following the first menstrual cycle.

In this country and most civilized countries, it's a crime for an older, powerful, man to persuade a girl into having "consensual" sex because we realize the power of power.

You can make excuses that it was a different time, but you accept as fact that it's the same God and His rules.
 

ecco

Veteran Member
You may have taken the Harvey Weinstein avenue but God does not.
You are right. Harvey Weinstein took the road paved by God - women are nothing more than chattel for men to do with as they choose.

Maybe you need to read, and really understand, the verses quoted in post #1134.
 
You are right. Harvey Weinstein took the road paved by God - women are nothing more than chattel for men to do with as they choose.

Maybe you need to read, and really understand, the verses quoted in post #1134.
It’s you that lacks understanding
 
What's false? That I said she was naive? She was just as naive as any of Weinsteins conquests. Additionally, she was indoctrinated since birth, as were most people in her tribe, to believe in gods and angels.

Was she too young to give consent? Well, for those folks the "age of consent" was anything following the first menstrual cycle.

In this country and most civilized countries, it's a crime for an older, powerful, man to persuade a girl into having "consensual" sex because we realize the power of power.

You can make excuses that it was a different time, but you accept as fact that it's the same God and His rules.
You would be better off not saying anything because you’re one of the most ignorant people of Scripture I’ve ever talked to.
 

McBell

Unbound
Are you sure?
Sure about what?
Your super shallow empty claim of victory?
No, I am not.
Thus the reason I flat out asked you.

Interesting that you did not answer the question....

Are you answering for another member?
What question do you think I answered?
Are you confusing me with another member?


That can’t be the correct word...
Except for the fact that that is the word you repeatedly asked another member to reveal.
How it applies to your "discussion" is not something I am concerned with.
 

McBell

Unbound
You would be better off not saying anything because you’re one of the most ignorant people of Scripture I’ve ever talked to.
images.jpg
 
Sure about what?
Your super shallow empty claim of victory?
No, I am not.
Thus the reason I flat out asked you.

Interesting that you did not answer the question....


What question do you think I answered?
Are you confusing me with another member?



Except for the fact that that is the word you repeatedly asked another member to reveal.
How it applies to your "discussion" is not something I am concerned with.
Maybe you guys need to have a zoom meeting and get your act together so you can come to some sort of agreement.
 
Top