Audie
Veteran Member
Golden Ages are a nostalgic interpretation of the grass on the other side of the fence. Growth is what's important.
I know
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Golden Ages are a nostalgic interpretation of the grass on the other side of the fence. Growth is what's important.
That was a tall person question.Was there a golden age?
I don't take him seriously -- however seriously he may take himself.In all seriousness, the way you keep saying "socialist democrats" to refer to the Democratic party, why should we take your seriously?
"The trouble is, I don't believe the people are any better in this regard. "This is what bothers me the most about the entire affair.
Whether or not we want to consider it "partisan" the process wasn't respected or adhered to. That sets a troubling precedent. If the process was "partisan" that happened as a direct result of both parties - but especially Republicans - refusing to take of their blasted red and blue shirts and work in a bipartisan fashion. This has been an ongoing problem for a long time and this ridiculous partisan bickering is going to be the end of this country. When folks can't even set aside their damn t-shirts to respect the system, it's done. That represents such a fundamental disunity that disfunction is the only thing that will continue in Washington. The trouble is, I don't believe the people are any better in this regard.
Do we want this country to actually be a democracy, or not? And more critically, do we want it to actually be representative and make significant reforms to put us on that road?
Every witness only gave an opinion and the evidence was a dud. Every Senators already heard the evidence in the House hearings.Dems didn't want to follow procedure for their own case in the House. Dems blew it. The Senate has no obligation to help the House make a case it should have completed in the House. Dems took an incomplete case to trial. That is all on the Dems
I know
She is conflicting things as per her distorted comparison of abortion. The US is providing a choice to the citizens while China is forcing people to have an abortion. Read what you link and think about for more than 5 secs. All her points make me suspect that she is either A) stupid B) getting a pay check c) A and B
Li is conflating restriction on speech with socialism. One does not need to be a socialist to advocate against free speech. KSA has it and it's a monarchy.
Please allow me to suggest a slight rephrase, from "they don't even think" to "they can't even think." I can't tell you how many people I meet these days whose "heart-felt convictions" are little more than the opinions they received from their most recent conversation in the local pub.Trump tells the mob he will never allow "socialism" and they lap it up.. They don't even think.
Expecting a dwarf to answer i suppose? ;0)That was a tall person question.
"The trouble is, I don't believe the people are any better in this regard. "
The people in question are those fixated on their television sets, who wouldn't know reality if it bit them on the bum. The pure hucksterism that we saw in the SOTU address last night is example enough -- "the people" believe what their preachers tell them to, because thinking for themselves, working it out, taking responsibility is a huge lot of trouble. So why bother?
Ah, like a quedtion for blondes.That was a tall person question.
What viable alternatives to Dems and Reps have we allowed? Libertarian and Green sometimes get in, every once in awhile some other group, but election laws makes it very difficult for such candidates to make it on each state's ballot.Did you ever ask yourself why they don't run their own candidates but rather back the socialist Democrats by getting (deeply) involved in the election* ?
A little excerpt...
~"It is about choosing what direction the country will go in. So, we work with allies in the union movement, "~. CPUSA
Why does the CPUSA support Democratic Party candidates for the presidency instead of running their own candidates?
I would say if you have the backing/support of the Communist party of the United States would would willingly forgo their own candidates for the socialist Democratic party , there's a real problem.
Maybe it's time to end the two party system and bring in some new ones.What viable alternatives to Dems and Reps have we allowed? Libertarian and Green sometimes get in, every once in awhile some other group, but election laws makes it very difficult for such candidates to make it on each state's ballot.
And, does this criticism also apply to Libertarians and their political alliance with social and religious conservatives? Those who do want the government in your bedroom and in your doctors office? And want us all praying to their Jesus?
When reading the output of Limbaugh over the years -- an absolute travesty. (But what else would one expect from this cretin? He'll personally give blow-jobs to every member of his "base" that he thinks will vote for him again, if that's what it takes.)When Rush Limbaugh is given the highest award a civilian can receive from the President who also commended Alex Jones...
Care to explain why, in any detail?This is a great day for America.
Oh, what could possibly be wrong with a never-ending, hate-filled Hatfield-McCoy family feud?Maybe it's time to end the two party system and bring in some new ones.
Oh, what could possibly be wrong with a never-ending, hate-filled Hatfield-McCoy family feud?
Careful there, bub....she might punch you in the knee.Expecting a dwarf to answer i suppose? ;0)
Fixed?Ah, like aquedtionquestion for blondes.