Assange Says Russian Didn't Give Us E-Mails

[meghanwaterlillies]

Veritas was "what"? I don't understand what you're saying.

Regardless I think this election was hard on some folks, especially hillary. My sister showed me a video the other day trashing Hillary again that she has sezuires. But this video wasn't. I researched the video again and again I get crappy one liners titled something ridiculous like " Hillary's doctor " and a doctor holding something odd in their hand -- Another title hillaries handlers or Hillary is sick yada yada.
But the video bothered me of what my sister presented to me as a "stroke or sezuire" because even if it was; people don't just snapp out of it by someone just merely touching them. If that were true helping someone in those areas would be easy. I got many pro trump rallies of people in the audience acting up too. Crowds are weird. I really don't like the antagonizing these people weren't even elected yet whether they were pro trump or pro Hillary. That's a flag to me. And makes me a little sad. Anyways now the motto is "make America sick again." Coming out after all this stuff. It's their slogan and that's what they are chanting. Give me a break.

 

[Parchment]

Right now we have two options:
1. One guy is lying to protect a source.

2. A slew of independent government agencies are colluding with the president to to deliberately delude the public to specifically harm international relations with another country to damage the next administration.
I do not know for sure which is correct, but I do know which one doesn't require a conspiracy theory to believe.

I'd say option 2 is a bit misworded, maybe a more accurate wording might be:

#2 Some independent government agencies who cannot %100 agree amongst themselves whether it was the Russians that were behind the hacking much less prove it had an impact on the election create an assessment and it is used as a political weapon by the current administration against the incoming President.

Option 1 might be better worded:

#1 A disgruntled employee of the DNC who would have had the easiest access to the e-mails found and leaked them.

Is it easier to believe that:

Some foreign government hacked into Clinton e-mails and published them to get Trump elected because of some massive plan to undermine the west/ EU (remember that some in the U.K. and Germany are also using the theory that Russia is meddling and it is claimed they are funding so called "Far- right" Eurosceptic parties) because they plan some great expansion in the future.

Or

A disgruntled DNC employee which had the easiest access to the e-mails found and leaked them, the people of the U.K. freely and fairly voted for Brexit because they were disgusted with a system that they saw as unfair and undemocratic, Angela Merkel is going to lose the next free and fair election in Germany because of her failed policies and the FN borrowed money from a Russian based bank simply because it was the one bank that actually would lend to them (European banks refused to loan the FN or any of it's officers money)

One requires a massive conspiracy theory and one does not.