I'm not a true Scotsman, either.They're like Scotsmen, then?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I'm not a true Scotsman, either.They're like Scotsmen, then?
Unless Scotsmen always lie. In which case . . . er . . . now I'm confused.I'm not a true Scotsman, either.
I'm not a true Scotsman, either.
doppelgänger;2421070 said:Unless Scotsmen always lie. In which case . . . er . . . now I'm confused.
Well, in so far as the choice of the word "refute" is not debatable, sure.Well that seems to clear a lot things up. So Atheism is just a position taken or made to refute theism. Positive atheism is just an absolute position then.
I don't believe in theists.
Regardless of what else we might all believe, I think everyone can agree that atheists are cowards when it comes to believing in god.
Well, in the case of two Scotsmen, one always lies and one always tells the truth.
Can anyone refute the claim the "atheism" is not a belief, besides just downright saying that it's not, or even complicating it to the point where the partakers cannot even distinguish what is and what isn't determination?
Nope - no one yet has been able to refute that atheism isn't a belief.
No one has done the Opposite either.
I guess if you're not paying attention.
No one has done the Opposite either.
Oh yea, don't think that this applies to you or anything as well.
More accurately, you haven't acknowledged anyone doing the opposite (supporting the fact that atheism is not a belief). It's been done many times.
Wow, another completely irrelevant remark. What a treat.
From this article....Nope - no one yet has been able to refute that atheism isn't a belief.
From this article....
Atheism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
we have....
"In practical or pragmatic atheism, also known as apatheism, individuals live as if there are no gods and explain natural phenomena without resorting to the divine. The existence of gods is not rejected, but may be designated unnecessary or useless; gods neither provide purpose to life, nor influence everyday life, according to this view.[55] A form of practical atheism with implications for the scientific community is methodological naturalismthe "tacit adoption or assumption of philosophical naturalism within scientific method with or without fully accepting or believing it."
People who operate this way would seem to lack belief.
It looks like refutation to me.
How would this refute that atheism isn't a belief? Wouldn't a lack of belief imply it isn't a belief?