And atheists, who make no such truth claims, are not arrogant.arrogance: the belief that *I alone* know the truth and anyone who does not agree is of course an idiot.
In other words, fanatics are arrogant.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
And atheists, who make no such truth claims, are not arrogant.arrogance: the belief that *I alone* know the truth and anyone who does not agree is of course an idiot.
In other words, fanatics are arrogant.
Discredit their texts?
Discredit their faith in their text of choice?
Point out that had they been born in a different place they'd have embraced a different religious text?
Point out that their faith is not a product of reason or evidence?
That's my point. Religions are like art. They're just reflections of the societies that generate and interpret them. There's no point in blaming the art for the culture that generated it, yet a lot of people do. I don't know why. It's like they think the art makes us. Like blaming Hollywood for producing too many movies about sex, violence, and money.But it's still there in the texts. What kind of change is going to alter that. Oh, they made a mistake so long ago.
And it's humans who make religions by the way.
Oh look, another Atheist hating thread based on ignorance.
How are you NOT getting it???{Valjean said: ↑
How are you defining arrogant? Atheists simply don't believe in a claim without evidence.}
Not following. How are you getting this out of a claim that atheists don't believe in things without evidence?
I'm not so arrogant as to presume that I possess the capacity to determine the possibilities and limitations of what can and cannot exist. So I am able to recognize that unicorns do, indeed, "exist", but only in some ways, and not in others.How do ignorance, bigotry, ego, greed, and so on apply to atheists?
You probably don't believe in unicorns. You're an a-unicornist. Does that position make you ignorant, bigoted, egotistic or greedy?
That's my point. Religions are like art. They're just reflections of the societies that generate and interpret them. There's no point in blaming the art for the culture that generated it, yet a lot of people do. I don't know why. It's like they think the art makes us. Like blaming Hollywood for producing too many movies about sex, violence, and money.
It's foolish.
Are you ignorant because you make blanket claims about atheists or do make blanket claims about atheists because you're ignorant. In either case, you're not doing Islam any favors with such drivel.
Or, as Christians largely were until God was made dead. Back when Christians did not ascribe to cultural relativist post-modernist interpretations to the Bible, back when kill them meant kill them, not ponder if it really means kill them in mind or spirit or someother vague metephoric idea of kill.That's just one issue.
And not even the one this thread is about.
He has taught me a good deal about Islam, although not much I didn't already know. He just reinforced my opinions about his religious world view.
Not just on this thread either.
I see him as a solid Muslim and well explains why most people find Islam immoral.
Tom
Some are Atheist because of the ignorance experienced in a religion.
and even more are atheist becuase of their experience with religion.Some are Atheist because of the ignorance experienced in a religion.
None of those things are "set in stone". We continue to engage in those ideals and practices because we WANT TO. Because they still MAKE SENSE TO US. (Or to most of us.) Eventually, when they no longer make sense to us, or we no longer see any benefit in them, we will let them go ... like those bronze monuments to long dead rich guys who lost wars they never should have fought to begin with.Well I blame religions - for setting such things in stone and so as to be quite difficult to change - being God-ordained or whatever. I'd include things like circumcision, attitudes towards females, along with towards homosexuality which might have fared better had we not had such dogmatic adherence to religious teaching - and the texts from whence such came.
Some are Atheist because of the ignorance experienced in a religion.
Who knows.Are atheists arrogant because they don't believe or do they not believe because they are arrogant?
Those who believe that their beliefs in God, and acts of worshipping God, makes them either immune to arrogance or beyond it, are most definitely arrogant. "I'm too good to be arrogant", is a statement of arrogance.I have not seen anyone who truly believes in one God and worships Him, being arrogant.
Sounds like Left Coast got it right... it's a topic for discussion... calm down, you shouldn't take it personally.
Those who believe that their beliefs in God, and acts of worshipping God, makes them either immune to arrogance or beyond it, are most definitely arrogant. "I'm too good to be arrogant", is a statement of arrogance.
We're allowed to say that Fundamentalism is un-enlightening, but we are not allowed to discuss atheist traits... Seems biased and unfair, especially in stating someone is "free to go" for exploring the idea.
...Ridiculously unfair, IMO.
Did someone claim that theists are immune to arrogance..? I don't recall seeing that here, or is it an assumption?
No one is "handing theists their reality". Theism is a choice, determined by experience, just as atheism or agnosticism is a choice, determined by experience.
I assume sarcasm because atheists do make absolutist claims about religion being evil (not all, to forgo the obvious retort) but some.And atheists, who make no such truth claims, are not arrogant.