Atheism is ILLEGAL?

[Matheist]

I have a passing familiarity.
But it's been over 4 decades since I took formal logic in school.

Then what's wrong, does it clearly show the logical deduction from "God" to "Nature's God" and the "Public Policy"?

I didn't say it was.

The subjects come up here all the time.
I even knew of them beforehand.
Are you asking for me to explain them to you?

Your question infers something else. Since when Atheism have "Founding Principles? lol

Does this mean that you advocate giving government the
power to determine who is bigoted, & then to imprison them?

What's wrong with current regulations and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights? You're against Basic Human Rights?

Do you oppose capitalism?
What is your proposed alternative?

The propagandist blame on religions, and then...

Yes, I know, you agree on this.

The Criminal.

 

[Revoltingest]

Then what's wrong, does it clearly show the logical deduction from "God" to "Nature's God" and the "Public Policy"?

You had a false premise, & a lack of logical argument.

Since when Atheism have "Founding Principles?

There are none, since there's nothing founded.

What is wrong with current regulation and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights? You're against Basic Human Rights?

I like human rights.

Would you answer the question....
Does this mean that you advocate giving government the
power to determine who is bigoted, & then to imprison them?

The propagandist blame on religion, and then...

Yes, I know, you agree on this.

Agree on what?

 

[Evangelicalhumanist]

Have you ever met and spoken to an atheist. Because you post indicates that you haven't.

I don't think the question should has he "spoken to an atheist," but rather "listened to." Because the evidence (including the fact that I've responded to him in some detail) is that he has not.

And since his God gave him two ears and only one mouth, it appears as if he is using those in a proportion against the will of his deity.

 

[Revoltingest]

Prove it. Your blind claims carry no value.



So I have proved your claim is wrong.



It does not necessarily you insult Nature's God and Religions. Please mind your own business.



Of course, it is DEMOCRACY.

Why should it be your opinion alone?



100% bigot?

Bless your heart.

 

[Evangelicalhumanist]

That's how mankind defines their God... ie. Nature's God.

ALL MANKIND agree with this, and you can research their holy texts.

HAH! He has just denied me, and all atheists, a place within "MANKIND," since we do NOT agree. What hubris. What overweening pride of his own opinion. What a rejection of anything that might be good about what his God is supposed to be about.

You have rights, but your rights cannot violate the universal rights... and:

"...a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes..." of respect for Nature's God.

This clearly against the universal rights:

disbelief or lack of belief in the existence of Nature's God.​

It makes void and violates the Constitutional Rights and The Universal Declaration of Human Rights. It is not rooted in science, logic, philosophy, fact etc but mere disbelief and opposition, ie. a Troll.

Your reasoning includes a great deal of "reading in," (also known as eisegis, as opposed to exegesis), which is usually a great way to pretend that you're right, but really, really bad reasoning.

 

[Matheist]

HAH! He has just denied me, and all atheists, a place within "MANKIND," since we do NOT agree. What hubris. What overweening pride of his own opinion. What a rejection of anything that might be good about what his God is supposed to be about.

That's what I said, Atheist should have no citizenship and migrate to remote Island, and where there is no country. Perhaps Pitcairn Island but I heard there is a Church on that Island. Good luck!

 

[Evangelicalhumanist]

That's what I said, Atheist should have no citizenship and migrate to remote Island, and where there is no country. Perhaps Pitcairn Island but I heard there is a Church on that Island. Good luck!

So, you are arrogating to yourself, and yourself alone, the power to declare what rights of belief should be enjoyed by other people.

So you are not arguing FOR God -- you are arguing that you SPEAK FOR GOD. Good luck with that!

 

[Revoltingest]

That's what I said, Atheist should have no citizenship and migrate to remote Island, and where there is no country. Perhaps Pitcairn Island but I heard there is a Church on that Island. Good luck!

Dang, man....sounds like you want either war or revolution.
Beware....we non-believers are numerous, armed, & sneaky.
There will be crushing, driving, & lamentation.

 

[Matheist]

So, you are arrogating to yourself, and yourself alone, the power to declare what rights of belief should be enjoyed by other people.

So you are not arguing FOR God -- you are arguing that you SPEAK FOR GOD. Good luck with that!

I have no such issue since I worship all gods and with all religions.

No god means:

He made all gods same god. (Quran 38:5)​

It does not mean:

disbelief or lack of belief in the existence of Nature's God.​

 

[Matheist]

It's not what you read, it's what you do.


IF no god

THEN live your life as if there is no god (accept all gods same god)​

ELSE hypocrite, a bigot (religious people) in disguise as an Atheist


Please stop using science etc for bigotry, hatred and racism!

 

[Matheist]

Dang, man....sounds like you want either war or revolution.
Beware....we non-believers are numerous, armed, & sneaky.
There will be crushing, driving, & lamentation.

No worry at all: I believe in God; ie.

My God: Consequence is NO COINCIDENCE.​

Bob Marley

Emancipate yourselves from mental slavery
none but ourselves can free our minds
have no fear for atomic energy
‘cause none of them can stop the time
How long shall they kill our prophets
while we stand aside and look? Ooohh!
Some say it’s just a part of it
‘We’ve got to fulfil the book’
Won’t you help to sing
these songs of freedom?
‘cause all I ever have​

 

[Evangelicalhumanist]

It's not what you read, it's what you do.


IF no god

THEN live your life as if there is no god (accept all gods same god)​

ELSE hypocrite, a bigot (religious people) in disguise as an Atheist


Please stop using science etc for bigotry, hatred and racism!

You are making less and less sense as you continue. This example of a syllogism is totally devoid of merit. You cannot say, in one breath, "live as if there is no god" and "accept all gods." This is called a contradiction. Perhaps you've heard of it? (Kind of like saying at the Post Office, "there are no stamps, so only use the stamps provided.")

What are you trying to accomplish? Who are you trying to convince? And what are you trying to convince them of?

 

[Matheist]

You are making less and less sense as you continue. This example of a syllogism is totally devoid of merit. You cannot say, in one breath, "live as if there is no god" and "accept all gods." This is called a contradiction. Perhaps you've heard of it? (Kind of like saying at the Post Office, "there are no stamps, so only use the stamps provided.")

What are you trying to accomplish? Who are you trying to convince? And what are you trying to convince them of?

You need to let go the religious frontal lobe (Your GOD) in order to make sense my argument. What you claimed to be not in anyway relevance to who you really are. It is not even you.

"Emancipate yourselves from mental slavery, none but ourselves can free our minds"; You build your own prison. lol

 

[A Vestigial Mote]

As soon as someone pointed out that the Declaration of Independence is NOT EVEN CLOSE to a document relating the laws of the country, this thread should have been over. @Matheist - you obviously have no idea what you are doing.

 

[Evangelicalhumanist]

You need to let go the religious frontal lobe (Your GOD) in order to make sense my argument. What you claimed to be not in anyway relevance to who you really are. It is not even you.

"Emancipate yourselves from mental slavery, none but ourselves can free our minds"; You build your own prison. lol

Okay, now I proclaim you to be totally delusional, for the very simple, obvious reason that over the distance of the internet, you can have no idea at all of who or what I am.

Sorry, I'll have to end our conversations. I wish you well, but suspect you may need some help in that.

 

[Revoltingest]

No worry at all: I believe in God; ie.

My God: Consequence is NO COINCIDENCE.​

Bob Marley

Emancipate yourselves from mental slavery
none but ourselves can free our minds
have no fear for atomic energy
‘cause none of them can stop the time
How long shall they kill our prophets
while we stand aside and look? Ooohh!
Some say it’s just a part of it
‘We’ve got to fulfil the book’
Won’t you help to sing
these songs of freedom?
‘cause all I ever have​

May your god greet you,
as liberty smiles upon me.

 

[PureX]

Then it makes the Constitutional Rights and The Universal Declaration of Human Rights as useless.

No, it doesn't.

 

[Jollybear]

God gave freedom to people to choose to be atheist or theist, but he gave no right to people to be atheist because atheism is not right, its wrong.

A freedom is not a right.

The constitution says we have a right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. But, thats the constitution.

In Gods kingdom, you have no right to life, liberty or the persuit of happiness because life and liberty and the opertunity to persue happiness are GIFTS, not rights.

A right is an entitlement.

 

[Curious George]

It is off-topic, and the red herring fallacy.. open your own thread to discuss about criminology ... and do you think the prosecutor failed to establish the mens rea and actus reus in the following case?

• An atheist was convicted for placing sexually explicit images of religious figures in the Liverpool Airport prayer room. Atheist guilty over cartoons left at Liverpool airport

"...The maximum sentence for such an offence is seven years in prison....."

Thus, I've already proved

1. Mens rea in Atheism, is a Crime in Nature.
2. Actus rea in Atheism, may become a Crime.

Lol, no those were not the actus reus and mens rea. No you certainly haven't proved that they were.

If you would like me to break down the actus reus and the mens rea for any crime give me a statute not a person committing the crime. Every statute has elements that must be proven. Actus reus and mens rea are simply categories of those elements.

 

[Dan From Smithville]

Could it be said that Atheism is unconstitutional and illegal?

The terrorist ideology and doctrines?

PREMISE: God means:

IN CONGRESS, JULY 4, 1776

The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America

When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation. We hold these truths to be self-evident...

The Declaration of Independence: Full text

He made all gods same god [LordLaw of Nature & Nature's God]. (Quran 38:5)​

THEREFORE, the definition of Atheism:

atheism /ˈeɪθɪɪz(ə)m/
noun
disbelief or lack of belief in the existence of Nature's God.​

Atheism rejects public policy and the Constitution; of all countries.

Atheism rejects the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, The United Nation.
Universal Declaration of Human Rights

It is the actus reus and mens rea of a criminal.

A very weird attempt at attacking atheism that fails. According to the Constitution, atheism is a supported right of the people. The Declaration of Independence is a declaration against British rule and is not the Constitution.