Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Nobody capable of using the word "god" lacks/does not have a belief in god (whether that belief is "god doesn't exist", "god exists", "gods exists", "I don't know", etc.). It is (again) physiologically impossible to be able to use the word "god" and not possess a belief about "god".
Which cannot describe any self-identified atheist or (more broadly) those capable of using words like "god", "deity", "dieu", "Gott", etc.
Let us agree that the definition of an atheist is someone who believes no god exists. It will take no longer and doesn't involve the kind of ambiguities or problems with your proposal. Of course, I'm not suggesting we actually agree on some "real" definition for the sake of expediency, as it takes no time at all to agree on an even clearer definition of atheism such as "an atheist is a rational number" or "an atheist is a member of any set which is not the empty/null set" or similarly ridiculous definitions.
god = an intelligent, immortal entity that has a degree of control over all things in the universe and more control over at least one specific aspect of the universe than any mortal thing.
I don't see your point. How "God" is conceptualised doesn't impact atheism. Doesn't atheism cover pretty much all concepts of God?
Exactly!
Absolutely. Then yes, I definitely relate to that. I don't beleive in em'.
The definition of atheist doesn't include a definition of "god".
Which definition is that?
That is where it gets interesting. No I don't think it does.
Many forms of pantheism, Shinto, Taoism, Confuscianism, many incarnations of Buddism and Hinduism, many forms of paganism, panentheism, deism - just off the top of my head.
The definition that I proposed?
It is impossible to possess such an understanding and have no belief. I've seen this in functional neuroimaging studies beginning with one of the first I ever worked on.
Not if infants are atheists or if atheism is defined as the "lack/absence of belief" in/with respect to god.
Not according to any standard usage, but definitely a usage which makes the term "atheist" a meaningless, pointless, irrelevant one.
How what doesn't fit?
I like you already.Some of these would be described as atheistic beliefs, though, and ideas of impersonal fields of consciousness aren't what most people would think of as God.
Whatever the other qualities, Gods are always personages.
Dammit -- now you've got me proposing definitive traits.
The definition
Which definition? Can you please take the trouble to write a complete sentence?
You're still working with a conscious entity. Image a rock and see what you get.
It's a very broad term, I agree, but it still, by definition, comprises applications where it would make no sense.