McBell
Unbound
I have established that the only way for you to maintain your "argument" is through blatant dishonesty.Golly. I didn't know it was about credibility. I'd better re-think my positi---no. I'm good, thanks.
Have at it.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I have established that the only way for you to maintain your "argument" is through blatant dishonesty.Golly. I didn't know it was about credibility. I'd better re-think my positi---no. I'm good, thanks.
I have no need nor desire to convince you of anything.It's all logic, really. Unless you can convince me of some other logic, my basic Aristolean logic applies.
I have established that the only way for you to maintain your "argument" is through blatant dishonesty.
Have at it.
Good thing it's not about you.I have no need nor desire to convince you of anything.
I also have no need nor desire to continue discussion with your blatantly dishonest tactics.
Have a nice day.
You keep on saying "negation", but a "lack of belief" is not a negation of the belief itself. It is merely the absence of that belief.Because no one can believe (or its negation) without something to believe (or its negation).
Belief is the belief of a proposition. (Because the world exists, it doesn't fail to exist.)
Atheism is specifically not believing in god.
It's not about nothing, which is all it would be to the person who is ignorant of said proposition.
You recognize the absence and then use the word .....belief....You keep on saying "negation", but a "lack of belief" is not a negation of the belief itself. It is merely the absence of that belief.
No, negation of believing is not believing.You keep on saying "negation", but a "lack of belief" is not a negation of the belief itself. It is merely the absence of that belief.
Give me a reason why there must be a cause first? And how can your cause have come to exist?Creator wasn't created by any other being. I can't admit a universe made by nothing. Give me an answer, if God doesn't exists give the cause of universe, including you and me and this humanity, etc?
What words am I switching?You recognize the absence and then use the word .....belief....
You're just substituting one word for the other.
Atheism is a declaration.
The stain of choice cannot be removed.
That isn't what she is claiming.No, negation of believing is not believing.
Negation is appropriate.
Why would they need a cause?So, what's the cause of bacteria?
Pay attention to your own argument.What words am I switching?
What do you think she is claiming?That isn't what she is claiming.
Enlighten me. Or are you just making false accusations that you can't back up?Pay attention to your own argument.
then consider...
the stain of choice cannot be removed.
Atheism is a declaration.
Have you tried oxy clean?.
The stain of choice cannot be removed.
Dead things do not beget the living.Why would they need a cause?
Have you tried logic?Have you tried oxy clean?
That theism is the mindset of bekief, and atheism is that mindset negated. In other words, one must actively believe that God does not exist.What do you think she is claiming?
Define "spark". Or is it just a speculative assumption that such a thing is necessary?Dead things do not beget the living.
Bacteria would still need that 'spark'
Blame God for the mold on your bread.
I won't drag you along.....Define "spark". Or is it just a speculative assumption that such a thing is necessary?
Are we answering questions with questions now?Have you tried logic?