It matters to god whether people believe in him or not because people who believe in him are much tastier and satisfying than those who do not believe in him.
Not to my palete, them religious babies are so chewey,
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Atheism is not scientific
- Thread starter Ostronomos
- Start date
Not to my palete, them religious babies are so chewey,
FFS i have given you the answer, tough that you don't like it. But if denying fact makes your faith stronger, it's up to you to live with that
Indeed but God can of course never be caught by anything to do with logic, or He would not be God.
So the evidence requirement is a ridiculous one and an arrogant one too.
Atheists are trapped in the religious dogma that cause and effect is all there is to reality.
They are adherents to the most stupid religion there is.
A Vestigial Mote
Well-Known Member
Only because it makes absolutely no sense to say one might "prove" atheism. There is nothing to be proven. I don't believe you - that's all. I'm not saying there is no God. I'm saying if there is a God, and you want to convince me that it's everywhere all the time and necessary for anything and everything to exist - well then one would think it should be ridiculously easy to provide evidence of a thing so fundamental to reality, wouldn't they? But it isn't easy, is it? Not in the slightest.
Go get your evidence, then come back and convince me. Until then, I don't want to hear about it. I will continue to put my mindful attention toward the evidence of things that actually produce results.
Their brains are more tender?It matters to god whether people believe in him or not because people who believe in him are much tastier and satisfying than those who do not believe in him.
perhaps, but I think the aromatics of the believing soul make believers much more palatable for the deity...
Only if really well boiled in a strong, wine based stock
So you're an agnostic, believing that god cannot be known or evidenced.
How so? How is it any different from the evidentiary requirement for any other belief?
And not collecting stamps is a worthwhile hobby
I simply believe that Consciousness precedes time, space and cause and effect.
So in that way I am not agnostic.
But when it comes to most religious ideas, I am a non-believer.
God can only be realised by going beyond your own consciousness (surrendering it) merging it into the Cosmic Consciousness.
You cannot realise God with your limited small mind, He is too vast for that, He is beyond creation.
You cannot also say that God exists, that is equally stupid as saying He does not exist.
He has nothing to do with any type of existence, He is beyond that.
The Creation exists, She can be analysed with the human mind, not God.
Colour is created in the brain, just as smell and taste is.
The vibrations in the brain are triggered by vibrations in the nerve cells and sense organs which are created by chemical or light wave/particle triggers.
The actual "seeing" of colour has nothing to do with the triggers themselves, it is an indirect process.
So you can never explain to a colour-blind person what colour really is to you.
And you cannot explain to someone who has never realised God "what" God "is".
Last edited:
Sorry; you seem emotional about this.
But apparently he has a gender and you know what it is... Interesting that...
I think his/her point is that color is a question of qualia, not wavelength.
I don't know about you, but I spend HOURS everyday not collecting stamps, OR coins!!!
In fact, I'm NOT DOING BOTH right now!
Colour is definitely a question of frequency, how that wavelength us perceived is subjective.
Apparently you don't understand what atheism is. Atheism has no beliefs, so can't be dogmatic.
It's the religious who are trapped in the cause-and-effect model, not the atheists. How many times have I heard arguments that a creation necessitates a creator or that every effect must be caused by someone?
In what way is atheism a religion? No beliefs, no dogma, no church or organized community, no ceremonies, no concept of sacred or profane, no rituals or services.
Name a single quality of "religion" that would apply to atheism.
Exactly! Color is all in our heads, it's a subjective experience produced by differential electromagnetic frequency; a qualia.
Not only that -- he has a sex.
Atheism is a belief, a dogmatic (I would say religious) idea that reality is limited only to where cause and effect (or time and space) can reach.
God is not male or female, but I choose to call the Supreme Consciousness a He and His Creation a She, just like I call people with willies he and the one with c*nts she.
It is of course a fallacy to use that in this discussion, just like it is a fallacy to compare spirituality to not collecting stamps. But is takes intelligence to spot a fallacy and we are dealing here with religious folk, not spiritual folk.
So they are not to blame.
God is not male or female, but I choose to call the Supreme Consciousness a He and His Creation a She, just like I call people with willies he and the one with c*nts she.
It is of course a fallacy to use that in this discussion, just like it is a fallacy to compare spirituality to not collecting stamps. But is takes intelligence to spot a fallacy and we are dealing here with religious folk, not spiritual folk.
So they are not to blame.
And my point is that colour could be measured wheras a god is in the the head and cannot be measured