FlyingTeaPot
Irrational Rationalist. Educated Fool.
That is not true. You are the one who is not backing things up.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
That is not true. You are the one who is not backing things up.
No, Evolution is a fact. The Theory of Evolution explains the mechanism of the fact of evolution.
For example, gravity is a fact. The theory of gravitation explains the mechanism by which gravity works.
Sounds like another label for God to me.The Tao is also eternal and self-existent.
"The Tao is like a well:
used but never used up.
It is like the eternal void:
filled with infinite possibilities.
It is hidden but always present.
I don't know who gave birth to it.
It is older than God."
-chapter 4 Tao Te Ching (NEV)
Sounds like another label for God to me.
Sounds like another label for God to me.
No, it is not. That is circular logic.
No, it is not. That is circular logic.
I know....ain't it great!You have the right to believe what you want.
To me god is not a concept you hold in your head but a vibrational frequency sensed intuitively in the heartI don't really have a clear concept of God in my head so I guess it depends on your particular concept. The Great Tao is impersonal on the macro level and the many taos are personal on the micro level, after all we're composed of the cosmos. Can't get any more personal than that.
Really?I am taking a break for the night. I will debate you guys tomorrow.
To me god is not a concept you hold in your head but a vibrational frequency sensed intuitively in the heart.
Everything is a frequency of energy.The greatest and purest of these frequencies is that of Love. God is love.As the end approaches expect the frequncies to get lower and lower in man.It is revealed in the music, in behaviors,etc.Notice how the music has been changing and went from dropped d tuning and now going to frequencies that are getting so low to barely hear but still effect us.It will continue genaration after generation only as a subtle annoyance from the previous generation .People will discern the lower pitches after awhile and then it will get lower as are vibrational frequencies get lower.Man is drifting further away from that of love.Families don't hold together as tight.Neighbors are becoming more distant to each other.People will bond more and more through electronics then in groups and be even more scattered.People are living behind locked doors and in fear instead of being neighborly.The world is becoming politically correct instead of morally correct.
As the frequency keeps dropping the resistance from that and the frequency of the most pure form of existance will cause corrosion.
Thats if i look at God from a cosmo's point of view!
Not tone death, just operating in lower frequencies.Very nice interpretation. Everything is a frequency of energy. :jam:
I know it can disheartening to see the changes in the world and construe them an irreversible tendency away from love. I don't view that as inevitable. We've come a relative long way in terms of equal rights, people around the world are demanding freedom, and the Internet can help connect people from diverse backgrounds around the globe. At least I'm tight with my family and I know a few neighbors. I believe that we will become more united in our diversity over time. I don't think people are becoming tone deaf to the vibrations of the universe.
I also believe that when there's lack of faith, there's also lack of good faith. You have plenty of faith in your God it seems, but perhaps you should put a little more faith in your fellow human beings. Together we can learn to listen to the subtle vibrations of love emanating throughout our being. unk:
Not tone death, just operating in lower frequencies.
Rights are about (me) and (I) and are illusional and another cause of separation.
I have faith in love but refuse to build a castle on the sand!
Your hitting the nail on the head.Rights are not needed when you walk in love.The only natural right I know of is to not be separate from all that is.All other rights are because of the illusion of seperation.I guess I do agree that many of our current social institutions will collapse due to their unnatural constructions. They were built on sand as you say. I take a long view approach to things, though. The end may be neigh, but it's only the prelude to a new beginning. Nothing ends. Nothing ever truly ends. After the dust settles, people can learn from their mistakes and grow, evolve, adapt, become reborn into a new way of living that is more in harmony with the vibrations of the spirit, the cosmos, and the ecosystem.
I don't see natural rights as just about the selfish ego. I'm compelled to accept and celebrate the rights of other individuals as well all around the world. Perhaps it is a problem that we're so dependent on the role of law to defend this rights rather than accepting them naturally. That's the shift that I see needing to take place. Then they can truly come into their own as natural rights and not just political rights. Remember it was the people who originally started demanding rights from their political institutions, not the political institutions imposing the illusion of rights upon individuals. The desire for freedom and equality comes from within.
To further this point:Really?
Are you really going to start debating?
I mean, the thread is how many pages long and you have not yet even begun to debate.
I think it would only be polite to start.
Your hitting the nail on the head.Rights are not needed when you walk in love.The only natural right I know of is to not be separate from all that is.All other rights are because of the illusion of seperation.
Here ponder on this quote from Einstein.
"When forced to summarize the general theory of relativity in one sentence: Time and space and gravitation have no separate existence from matter." - Albert Einstein
__________________
Sounds like another label for God to me.
How is my argument flawed?