So how can I tell whether this keyboard I'm typing on is God or not? What's the objective test?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
So how can I tell whether this keyboard I'm typing on is God or not? What's the objective test?
When one imagines God as a "being" with a separate existence from that of yourself, that is what is imaginary. The non-imaginary solution is simple: God is not an object of belief, but the Subject of all that is. You want to see God? Pick up a rock, pet a cat, breathe in the air.My position is that the concept of a real god, a god with objective existence, not imaginary, is incoherent. And no one is offering non-imaginary solutions.
Yo, WW ─ I trust you're well?When one imagines God as a "being" with a separate existence from that of yourself, that is what is imaginary. The non-imaginary solution is simple: God is not an object of belief, but the Subject of all that is. You want to see God? Pick up a rock, pet a cat, breathe in the air.
God is the Seeing of Reality. God is who we are. If we don't know what God is, we don't know ourselves. We see ourselves as an object too, just like God, always looking for the eyes we are looking out from the whole time.
That's the solution. Get rid of subject/object dualism. Quit looking and start seeing.
No offense, atheists, but if you don't know what you're not believing in, then yours is an unconsidered opinion.
Is the above an "unspecified and unconsidered assertion about what one does or does not believe"*?
When a believer says "I believe in G-d", he has a specified Being in his mind, he may provide further details about Him if asked.
When a non-believer says in his response "I don't believe in God" that is the denial of that specific God mentioned in "I believe in G-d" only, not in general about all god/s believed by different people.
Regards
____________
* one may like to read post #42, #59 from PureX and:
posts #62 from paarsurrey
Did you not see the pink elephant why you painted it ?Is the above an "unspecified and unconsidered assertion about what one does or does not believe"*?
When a believer says "I believe in G-d", he has a specified Being in his mind, he may provide further details about Him if asked.
When a non-believer says in his response "I don't believe in God" that is the denial of that specific God mentioned in "I believe in G-d" only, not in general about all god/s believed by different people.
Regards
____________
* one may like to read post #42, #59 from PureX and:
posts #62 from paarsurrey
I can guess why things get frustrated then.I agree.
I still believe - despite the many frustrated comments I have received due to it - that everyone believes in god.
Yes, G-d has let us know what a real G-d is and real qualities/attributes He has.
Regards
Yes, G-d has let us know what a real G-d is and real qualities/attributes He has.
Regards
I agree.
I still believe - despite the many frustrated comments I have received due to it - that everyone believes in god.
Doesn't that apply to theists as well? I guarantee that there will be countless god concepts people somewhere in the world have believed in that neither of us are even aware of. Do we believe in the existence of those gods?No offense, atheists, but if you don't know what you're not believing in, then yours is an unconsidered opinion.
When god knocked on my door, I missed him because I was on the phone with Belphegor.God exists and is closer than your jaguar vien to yo, watchout and tell us your experiences this time!!
Doing well. Thanks. Yourself?Yo, WW ─ I trust you're well?
No, not a synonym. Rather, it's more like the paper on which everything is drawn. It's not seen in the drawings, yet the drawings without it would be nothing, they would be no 'thing' at all, they would have no objective reality. They would not be a they.I'm afraid the only result I see from your suggestion is the reduction of the word 'God' to a synonym for 'anything'. Or 'everything' if you prefer. I find 'anything' is a much clearer way of saying 'anything' and 'everything' is a much clearer way of saying 'everything', so that doesn't really answer my question.
G-d has introduced Himself in the very first chapter of the Quran like thus:Please provide evidence for that claim please
G-d has introduced Himself in the very first chapter of the Quran like thus:
[1:1]In the name of Allah, the Gracious, the Merciful.
[1:2]All praise belongs to Allah, Lord of all the worlds,
[1:3]The Gracious, the Merciful,
[1:4]Master of the Day of Judgment.
[1:5]Thee alone do we worship and Thee alone do we implore for help.
[1:6]Guide us in the right path —
[1:7]The path of those on whom Thou hast bestowed Thy blessings, those who have not incurred Thy displeasure, and those who have not gone astray.
The Holy Quran - Chapter: 1: Al-Fatihah
In the first four verses He had provided the key attributes of Him, then has taught how we should seek his guidance that He provided to the persons blessed by Him and the last verse is about the persons who did not tread that path.
Regards
Was that her point? I think you may have misunderstood.That's a bit of a cop-out, isn't it.
You don't know what you don't believe in, therefore you can't not believe in it???
By the same argument, if you don't know what you don't believe in, therefore you can't believe in it, either.
In other words atheists can't believe in a god or gods....Which is basically the definition of an atheist
Still here.Doing well. Thanks. Yourself?
What if we say, the rock is mass-energy? What if we say mass-energy is the paper the universe is written on? That way we make a statement about reality that doesn't rely on imagination, and can be true or false, no?A rock is a rock, but because God Is. The rock does not exist without God.
Not believe in what, though?That's a bit of a cop-out, isn't it.
You don't know what you don't believe in, therefore you can't not believe in it???
Well, you can't believe in things you're ignorant of, this is true. However, if you're going around claiming you don't believe in a thing, it ought to actually be a thing you're not believing in.By the same argument, if you don't know what you don't believe in, therefore you can't believe in it, either.
In other words atheists can't believe in a god or gods....Which is basically the definition of an atheist
It applies to theists, yes. If they're believing in something, which asserts it as true, they ought to know what it is they're believing in.Doesn't that apply to theists as well? I guarantee that there will be countless god concepts people somewhere in the world have believed in that neither of us are even aware of. Do we believe in the existence of those gods?
There are plenty who describe God as energy. But when you are speaking of energy here, I assume you mean that measure of something on the physical plane. The meaning of energy in a physical sense would not translate over to the non-physical, such as the domain of thought, or of spirit. But as an artificial "thing" we call something that it's actually not, energy works for the spiritual domain and mental domains as well, such as "the energy of negative thought", or the "energy of the Divine Will", or something like that.What if we say, the rock is mass-energy? What if we say mass-energy is the paper the universe is written on? That way we make a statement about reality that doesn't rely on imagination, and can be true or false, no?