+.....I would like to be the Easter Bunny.
I see that you've been practicing already.
[youtube]B04xngldt2k[/youtube]
YouTube - Hilarious!! The Evil Easter Bunny
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
+.....I would like to be the Easter Bunny.
Actually it does, or at least that you don't understand coincidences. But it all depend on what you define as coincidence. Saying you don't believe in coincidence just means you disagree with what some people define as coincidence. Traveling to Europe and seeing someone you know would be coincidence to most people. Are you saying you think there's something more to that, or do you agree that it's coincidence?
I highly doubt you actually actively didn't believe. I'm guessing it was more like you just didn't think about it much, and if asked during that period, you'd just have said you didn't know.
Yes, we can. I'm not even so interested in whether or not you believe in God. What I'm interested in is your reasoning for doing so and the conclusions that has led you to.
I think you missed the part about God deciding Earth was perfect and not some other planet. The question was why God made the conditions we have here perfect. Why not create different life on Jupiter instead?
Did they happen at a rate greater than would be expected by chance? How would you know?As for the last point; Simple, it was prayer. Things happened that were prayed for and not just once or twice buy many many times.I know hat you will consider that a coincidence. For me it just reaffirmed my belief.
No, you didn't. You explained that life as we know it can only survive under certain conditions, but you never explained why life must be as we know it.I did not miss the point. I think I explained it to you.
What about the 'old Atheist'? Was he any better?
I think you're right, however, there should be atheist campaigns against the Easter Bunny and Santa Clause. As a matter of fact, though I'm not really an atheist, either a new one or an old one, I am just as angry at the Easter Bunny and Santa as I am at God.
And like the new Atheist that wants to be God, I would like to be the Easter Bunny. I don't think I'd like being Santa Clause, given the fact that he is stuck up at the North Pole 364 days of the year. But the Easter Bunny, that I could handle. Nothing to do but eat chocolate and colored eggs all year round, and hang out with a bunch of kids at the mall. Doesn't seem like too hard a life.
+
I see that you've been practicing already.
[youtube]B04xngldt2k[/youtube]
YouTube - Hilarious!! The Evil Easter Bunny
No, you didn't. You explained that life as we know it can only survive under certain conditions, but you never explained why life must be as we know it.
Hey, I thought all copies of that video were destroyed or erased before my upcoming court date. I knew that yellow chick was lying to me. When I get my hands on . . .
(The elevator shot on that video was wicked funny. I had to stop it and play it back while laughing outloud. The bunny just jumps out of freakin' nowhere. Hilarious.)
As for the last point; Simple, it was prayer. Things happened that were prayed for and not just once or twice buy many many times.I know hat you will consider that a coincidence. For me it just reaffirmed my belief.
I did not miss the point. I think I explained it to you.
If I take a box of 1000 toothpicks. Open it, and dump the toothpicks onto the ground.
What are the odds that they would have landed exactly the way they landed?
How many times do you think I would have to repeat my actions to get them to land in the exact same positions, and in the exact order, as my first throw?
What are the odds? Well, as you said, they are 'way out there'.
But guess what? It did happen. Once. On that first attempt.
That is all it needs. Just once.
Therefore, the odds that it DID occur are 1:1.
Pretty good odds.
You are comparing toothpicks to life on other planets? Think about it. You have billions of planets and lets say most have the same condtions of that as earth does.
Meaning the tilt of the axis, a moon orbiting at the same distance, the perfect distance from its sun and you are saying it just happened?
Ok lets see your proof that it just happened?
You seem to have missed the point. The point is you're saying the odds are too high for life to have formed on its own without an intelligent creator. You're using high odds as your evidence.
In the toothpick example, the odds of having the toothpicks land exactly the way they did are astronomical, but it happened with no intelligence behind it at all. The point being highly improbably odds aren't evidence of anything.
Didn't have to read past the opening sentence to know the whole thing would be crap. But it is nice to have such warnings right up front---the only "good" thing about it.
Knowledgeable about religion.Skwim, you had a similarly rubbish article about atheists being the most knowledgable
about religion. I didn't even have to read to it know it was rubbish.
the concept of chance/chaos does not resonate with the theists...
everything has to have a purpose because there is a creator
chaos is a concept that atheists can grasp...
it's not the why, it's the how...
it's like fusing water with oil...it will never work
This is making it way too complicated. The fact of the matter is that it takes a certain minimum level of intelligence to be able to fully grasp analogies and the relevant variables and relationships which constitute them. There are simply a lot of people who don't meet this minimum requirement, and these people often seem to be those with the most fundamentalist or extremist religious views.
Calculating the odds of something happening AFTER it has happened is nothing more than an argument from incredulity fallacy.You are comparing toothpicks to life on other planets? Think about it. You have billions of planets and lets say most have the same condtions of that as earth does.
Meaning the tilt of the axis, a moon orbiting at the same distance, the perfect distance from its sun and you are saying it just happened? Ok lets see your proof that it just happened?
So you admit your "arguments" are nothing more than "empty conjecture" and "weak suppositions"?IYou know what? I did not purposely go out to insult them. However, some have no problem going out of their way insulting those who do believe don't they? And their arguments have just as much empy conjecture and weak suppositions as well.
Anyways, I don't take things to heart. This is a debate forum and we are debating. Its all more about the fun of the debate anyways.
Either way no one is going to concede to the other. So we will just keep debating the issue.
So you admit your "arguments" are nothing more than "empty conjecture" and "weak suppositions"?