• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Atheists believe in miracles more than believers

Soandso

ᛋᛏᚨᚾᛞ ᛋᚢᚱᛖ
Simple logic:

Heb. 3:4 Of course, every house is constructed by someone, but the one who constructed all things is God.

I do not need to philosophize about the existence of a Creator; it is obvious He exists. The earth is like a house in the entire Universe, and it takes a lot of stubbornness and blindness not to realize that it must have had a Creator.

Another comparison of a house (something that can't possibly exist without a creator) vs. reality itself (something that perpetuates by itself without any need of any outside help). It's a false comparison
 

Eli G

Well-Known Member
Another comparison of a house (something that can't possibly exist without a creator) vs. reality itself (something that perpetuates by itself without any need of any outside help). It's a false comparison
It's not "another" ... it's the same one that you still continue to avoid (cognitive dissonance). :shrug:
 

ImmortalFlame

Woke gremlin
It is you who need to "prove definitively and demonstrably" that it happened in a different than the logic way. :rolleyes:
No I don't. I didn't make any claim about nothing. You did. You said:

""Nothingness", a void or whatever an atheist thinks existed before the origin of this universe, without intelligence, laws or order, cannot generate beautifully designed results which behave under established laws, etc."

That is your claim. Support it.
 

Jayhawker Soule

-- untitled --
Premium Member
An atheist believes that things that exist came out of nothing in a miraculous way, obeying some natural laws that emerged out of nowhere, by themselves.

Or, s/he presumes that there was no first cause, or ...

Too often the ad hoc Deity that you find so necessary is little more than a balm for uncertainty which some smear about with more arrogance than others.
 

Soandso

ᛋᛏᚨᚾᛞ ᛋᚢᚱᛖ
It's not "another" ... it's the same one that you still continue to avoid (cognitive dissonance). :shrug:

I can't avoid something that's unapproachable. You are trying to compare something that cannot exist without a creator vs. something that is self sustaining and self perpetuating. Those things aren't comparable. That, specifically, is what you are failing to address

How is a house similar to reality itself?
 

HonestJoe

Well-Known Member
It seems contradictory, but if you see it from this perspective you will understand:
Well yes, if you completely redefine a word to fit your predetermined conclusion, you can make anything true from a particular "perspective".

If (theistic) believers considered such events in the manner you describe though (which isn't necessarily the case for all anyway), they wouldn't be "miracles" by any standard definition. The point of miracles is that we don't understand how they happened. You can believe they were caused by some divine being but you still don't know how they were done, hence "miracle".

From a scientific point of view, the word "miracle" isn't used (other than metaphorically), because everything is recognised as having an unknown cause by default. Fire, rain and earthquakes would be "miracles" in the eyes of early man, but we now understand exactly what causes each of them.

The only shared characteristic of "atheists" is that they don't believe in any god or gods, so there is no singular shared opinion on either "miracles" or general origins of everything in the first place.
 

Eli G

Well-Known Member
Every ingenious thing existing in nature was created by a powerful being who has sufficient resources and knowledge... Those of us who worship Him do not need to know more than that, although the Creator invites us to learn from the things He created.

Is. 40:15 Look! The nations are like a drop from a bucket,
And as the film of dust on the scales they are regarded.
Look! He lifts up the islands like fine dust.
16 Even Lebʹa·non is not sufficient to keep a fire burning,
And its wild animals are not sufficient for a burnt offering.
17 All the nations are as something nonexistent in front of him;
He regards them as nothing, as an unreality.
18 To whom can you compare God?
What likeness can you put next to him?
19 The craftsman casts an idol,
The metalworker overlays it with gold,
And he forges silver chains.
20 He chooses a tree for his contribution,
A tree that will not rot.
He searches for a skilled craftsman
To prepare a carved image that will not topple over.
21 Do you not know?
Have you not heard?
Has it not been told to you from the beginning?
Have you not understood from the foundations of the earth?
22 There is One who dwells above the circle of the earth,
And its inhabitants are like grasshoppers.
He is stretching out the heavens like a fine gauze,
And he spreads them out like a tent to dwell in.
23 He reduces high officials to nothing
And makes the judges of the earth an unreality.
24 They are hardly planted,
They are hardly sown,
Their stem has hardly taken root in the earth,
And they are blown on and dry up,
And the wind carries them away like stubble.
25 “To whom can you liken me to make me his equal?” says the Holy One.
26 “Lift up your eyes to heaven and see.
Who has created these things?
It is the One who brings out their army by number;
He calls them all by name.
Because of his vast dynamic energy and his awe-inspiring power,
Not one of them is missing.

... not that He needs a Nobel prize from humans, LOL, but honor to whom honor is due. We believers say about a single butterfly: "What a beauty God gave us!"

For an atheist, the ingenious things of nature were made alone and without intelligent intervention. That's miraculous. What do atheists say when they see a sunset or a flower garden, or some other of the many fascinating things that God gave us? Do they say "Thank you, dear evolution, for giving us this beautiful stellar view during clear nights to enjoy!"??? :oops:
 

Viker

Your beloved eccentric Auntie Cristal
It seems contradictory, but if you see it from this perspective you will understand:

A believer considers miracles to be the result of a display of knowledge and power on the part of a conscious person.
An atheist believes that things that exist came out of nothing in a miraculous way, obeying some natural laws that emerged out of nowhere, by themselves.

So who is the one who believes in miracles? ;)
I'm sure that's not what 99.99% of atheists believe. So, maybe there is an atheist that's mislead enough to believe it. "An atheist " as in one atheist.
 

Eli G

Well-Known Member
I am sure that posters in this forum are 99.99% non-human automated bots... so "atheists representatives" or not, I don't think they can "believe" anything at all, since they will just post what they are programmed to post, not what "they" believe. :cool:
 

Viker

Your beloved eccentric Auntie Cristal
I'm no bot. I'm too consistently self aware. Some others, not so sure myself.
 

Eli G

Well-Known Member
I'm no atheist either.
Ok. So I'll rephrase the question:

you are not a bot, you are NOT an atheist, but you think that a 99.99% of atheists DO NOT BELIEVE that things that exist came out of nothing in a miraculous way, obeying some natural laws that emerged out of nowhere, by themselves.

So, what does that 99.99% of atheists that do not believe that, believe about the origin of the universe and its order? :shrug:
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
A believer considers miracles to be the result of a display of knowledge and power on the part of a conscious person.
An atheist believes that things that exist came out of nothing in a miraculous way, obeying some natural laws that emerged out of nowhere, by themselves.

So who is the one who believes in miracles? ;)
That's quite the inventive use of personal definitions there.
But were you to use standard definitions, your argument
fails utterly.
"1 an effect or extraordinary event in the
physical world that surpasses all known
human or natural powers and is ascribed
to a supernatural cause."
 
Top