Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
It's not about belief for them. It's about knowing or not knowing. It's about distinguishing the knowable from the unknowable. It's about observable facts rooted in solid ground.Ok. So I'll rephrase the question:
you are not a bot, you are NOT an atheist, but you think that a 99.99% of atheists DO NOT BELIEVE that things that exist came out of nothing in a miraculous way, obeying some natural laws that emerged out of nowhere, by themselves.
So, what does that 99.99% of atheists that do not believe that, believe about the origin of the universe and its order?
Nonsense.Every ingenious thing existing in nature was created by a powerful being who has sufficient resources and knowledge...
"things that exist [did not necessarily come] out of nothing in a miraculous way, obeying some natural laws that emerged out of nowhere, by themselves."If atheists don't believe that "things that exist came out of nothing in a miraculous way, obeying some natural laws that emerged out of nowhere, by themselves." ... then what they believe about it?
Atheists (philosophical as well as colloquial) don't have a belief about the beginning of the universe that results from their atheism.Again, for non-bots:
If atheists don't believe that "things that exist came out of nothing in a miraculous way, obeying some natural laws that emerged out of nowhere, by themselves." ... then what they believe about it?
I can answer with my own view.So, what does that 99.99% of atheists that do not believe that, believe about the origin of the universe and its order?
In a stunning development that should surprise no one, both theists and atheists have diverse opinions about cosmogony given neither theism or atheism in of itself has anything to say about the matter. Theism is just acceptance or presence of some particular concept of god(s) and atheism is just rejection or absence of some particular concept of god(s). Cosmogony - the origins of the universe or reality - is a separate thing.If atheists don't believe that "things that exist came out of nothing in a miraculous way, obeying some natural laws that emerged out of nowhere, by themselves." ... then what they believe about it?
I am talking about this planet, earth, in the cosmos, compared to a house ...
Reality is something bigger than that.
No, creationists that do not understand the sciences claim that is what atheists believe. Atheists do not believe that everything came from nothing. That is a Christian belief.It seems contradictory, but if you see it from this perspective you will understand:
A believer considers miracles to be the result of a display of knowledge and power on the part of a conscious person.
An atheist believes that things that exist came out of nothing in a miraculous way, obeying some natural laws that emerged out of nowhere, by themselves.
So who is the one who believes in miracles?
The universe is not "a house".Maybe you think there are houses that build themselves... I can't help you to think logically.
It seems contradictory, but if you see it from this perspective you will understand:
A believer considers miracles to be the result of a display of knowledge and power on the part of a conscious person.
An atheist believes that things that exist came out of nothing in a miraculous way, obeying some natural laws that emerged out of nowhere, by themselves.
So who is the one who believes in miracles?
If they say that about life, what is left?"things that exist [did not necessarily come] out of nothing in a miraculous way, obeying some natural laws that emerged out of nowhere, by themselves."
You guys sure do like that word, "suddenly".Would it be more of a miracle that I would manage to humanize an entire population of apes on internet,
that a troop of them suddenly start talking at the zoo, or
that certain population of apes did by themselves in the past?
Atheism negates a Creator. PERIOD.
You also don't know the difference between something that a person makes and something that is produced alone?Create what? Everything?
Better to believe its just the laws of nature than believe conscience willpower created evil.
Given choice, my sanity is better with - just the laws of nature.
You never answered the question about Noah's Ark. For all practical purposes you probably are a YEC.I don't know how to make a bot understand that I'm not YEC without having to repeat it more times.
Evolutionists love to stretch the elastic of time, as if that would somehow change the unfathomable abyss that exists between nothingness, the inorganic, life, consciousness and art.
Maybe they should learn to perceive time in reverse; They would realize how little time they have left... No comments.