Atheists believe in miracles more than believers

[Eli G]

Someone on my ignore list to tell the rest that they are with him, that they are going to have to settle for the emoticons they use to stimulate each other, because I left them in that hole for obvious reasons: I don't care what they have to say...

I especially find repulsive some people with a certain way of speaking... a normal person would know what I mean, and that's enough for me ... I don't need any emoticon to feel pleased. My real life is awesome.

 

[Pogo]

Someone on my ignore list to tell the rest that they are with him, that they are going to have to settle for the emoticons they use to stimulate each other, because I left them in that hole for obvious reasons: I don't care what they have to say...

I especially find repulsive some people with a certain way of speaking... a normal person would know what I mean, and that's enough for me ... I don't need any emoticon to feel pleased. My real life is awesome.

Is this your rather verbose way of claiming your ignorance to be blissful?

 

[Dan From Smithville]

Is this your rather verbose way of claiming your ignorance to be blissful?

It is another mention of that ignore list that is claimed is not constantly referenced. I have never seen such a vaunted effort at the self-contradictory position statement.

 

[Eli G]

It is another mention of that ignore list that is claimed is not constantly referenced. I have never seen such a vaunted effort at the self-contradictory position statement.

So you now have material for your next laboratory experiment.

 

[Dan From Smithville]

Someone on my ignore list to tell the rest that they are with him, that they are going to have to settle for the emoticons they use to stimulate each other, because I left them in that hole for obvious reasons: I don't care what they have to say...

I especially find repulsive some people with a certain way of speaking... a normal person would know what I mean, and that's enough for me ... I don't need any emoticon to feel pleased. My real life is awesome.

What are your thoughts on passive aggression and its use as a debating technique? Do you think it is biblical?

 

[Eli G]

What do you think on the issue I opened this topic for?

 

[Nakosis]

How do you know that other humans are wrong?

I know they are wrong for me.
That's what I based it on.
That is also as far as it goes. Understand?
It is the best I can do.

 

[Dan From Smithville]

So you now have material for your next laboratory experiment.

Like much of what you post, I have no clear idea what that means. It only seems like it is offered as a pejorative for lack of any real substance to address these things.

 

[Eli G]

I wish you a wonderful Sunday.

 

[Dan From Smithville]

What do you think on the issue I opened this topic for?

Another baseless claim that has spent 20 pages being unsupported. Nothing that I find unusual considering.

If in fact you were responding to me. That you don't respond to anyone specifically just weakens it further in my view.

 

[Pogo]

So you now have material for your next laboratory experiment.

The Guiness book of records is full of such absurdities and people who strive to achieve such dubious records as you apparently currently hold.

 

[Dan From Smithville]

I wish you a wonderful Sunday.

If I'm included in this or it is being directed at me (who knows?) YOU made that "wish" come true much earlier.

Have a wholesome, wubbulous, wonderful rest of your day. I know I will.

 

[Dan From Smithville]

The Guiness book of records is full of such absurdities and people who strive to achieve such dubious records as you apparently currently hold.

I have to admit that I have seen positions defended by seemingly passive aggressive approaches from a very similar basis, but the technique of claiming the superiority of position while actively evading contact with others that have evidence, reasonable questions or valid counter arguments is a unique approach at the scope and scale demonstrated.

Personally, I see the practice unavoidably announce itself as a sign of a weakness of position. Apparently, that is one of those things that not everyone can perceive as is claimed elsewhere.

Not so oddly, based on this, I haven't seen the evidence and reasoned arguments to support and explain the claims of the OP.

I wonder and suspect that is as good as it is going to get.

 

[LuisDantas]

Yeah, but from there doesn't follow that it is a fact the world is natural. It might be unknown for ontology and metaphysics.

Yes... and even more reasonably, I "might" be King of some traditional country.

 

[YoursTrue]

I even showed them in a comment that before it was discovered what a closed system is and that our planet is one, the Bible already said it, stating that certain elements such as water and air have stable quantities on our planet. ..

They argued stupidly over I don't know how many comments, as they usually do, until in the end they discovered that I was right when I said that the earth is a closed system... just as the Bible had said for thousands of years.

Do you think it's worth trying to reason with people who just want to argue for the simple pleasure of arguing?
God have mercy on them.

I am seeing that to be true.

 

[YoursTrue]

I have to admit that I have seen positions defended by seemingly passive aggressive approaches from a very similar basis, but the technique of claiming the superiority of position while actively evading contact with others that have evidence, reasonable questions or valid counter arguments is a unique approach at the scope and scale demonstrated.

Personally, I see the practice unavoidably announce itself as a sign of a weakness of position. Apparently, that is one of those things that not everyone can perceive as is claimed elsewhere.

Not so oddly, based on this, I haven't seen the evidence and reasoned arguments to support and explain the claims of the OP.

I wonder and suspect that is as good as it is going to get.

In contrast to those who will not support their beliefs as to why they believe in God and evolution, right? After all, why should they?

 

[mikkel_the_dane]

Yes... and even more reasonably, I "might" be King of some traditional country.

I doubt that your reason in you determines what the universe is, but if your reason works for you, then fine.

 

[YoursTrue]

OOOH the no true Christian Fallacy.

what does that mean? And why would someone who claims to believe in God AND evolution at the same time keep his belief in God so hidden so no one can see why?

 

[Dan From Smithville]

How do you know that other humans are wrong?

As near as I can determine, the answer seems to be "they do not believe and behave as I do".

That seems to be the basis for declaring everyone that disagrees to be wrong without benefit of the need to demonstrate or provide explanation.

All I can say is that my questions don't get answered and my comments only receive responses from some sources that are consistent with that

 

[YoursTrue]

I doubt that your reason in you determines what the universe is, but if your reason works for you, then fine.

or maybe not.