• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Atheists: If God existed would God……

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
That makes no sense.

If you're responsible for a thing, then you're responsible for that thing's effects.
No, just because you created something that doesn't mean you are responsible for what it does after it is created.

Let's say a car manufacturer created a car that can go 240 MPH. The car has the potential to go way over the speed limit and crash into other cars and kill people, but that car also has the potential to stay within the speed limit, drive safely, and hurt nobody.

Once that car is sold and it rolls off the car lot, the car manufacturer is not responsible for how fast the buyer drives that car.

God created humans with free will and the potential to choose to do either good or evil.
Once humans are born with free will God is not responsible for what they do with their free will, and that is why it is called free. We are free to do what we want, if we have the ability and opportunity to do it.
We already established that you don't actually believe this.
No, I have already established that I do believe it. See above.
God isn't responsible for what humans do because humans have free will to choose.
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
So God creates children with the genes that cause cancers. Cool. Let's worship and celebrate this God.
God created many things that bring suffering and God also created many things that bring joy.
The material realm of existence is a mixed bag.

Why is it that atheists never mention the things God created that bring joy?
 

CG Didymus

Veteran Member
Who would not scoff at that?
Why would they "scoff" at peace and security? But then it says...

He several times promised victory to His companions and fixed the hour thereof. But when the hour struck, the divine promise was not fulfilled.
That sounds like Noah made false prophesies? But isn't this so much more believable than the Bible story about Noah and the flood? Or... does it just make it worse? To me it shows that Baha'is really don't care what the Bible story says... it's Baha'u'llah's story that counts. That's why I've asked them about the NT story about the birth of Jesus. Do they believe the NT or the Quran where Mary gives birth to Jesus under a date palm? Of course, the less they say, the better off they are.
 

Scolopendra

Member
You should not consider the various messengers as evidence without a thorough investigation..

Baha'is believe in what is called independent investigation of truth, which means that one should always investigate the truth for themselves if they want to know the truth. People should never take anyone else's word for what is true.

"The first Baha’i principle is the independent investigation of reality. Not found in any sacred Book of the past, it abolishes the need for clergy and sets us free from imitation and blind adherence to unexamined, dogmatic beliefs. Baha’is believe that no soul should follow ancestral or traditional beliefs without first questioning and examining their own inner landscape. Instead, the first Baha’i principle gives each individual the right and the duty to investigate and decide what they believe on their own."

Independent Investigation of Truth

I do not believe it is necessary to investigate all the older Messengers since what they revealed is no longer pertinent. The spiritual truths they revealed are eternal so they will always be true, but the older religions do not have the remedy that humanity needs in this new age. As such I believe that the only Messenger we should take time to investigate is Baha'u'llah, and if we come to believe in Him we accept all the Messengers of the past.
Will there be new Messengers after Baha'u'llah?
 

Aupmanyav

Be your own guru
Why would they "scoff" at peace and security?
I am not talking about the illusory peace and security which never came and will never come, not with the mutually antagonist Abrahamic religions, but about the years that Noah is supposed to have lived, 950 years. Would you believe in that?
 

Scolopendra

Member
I am not talking about the illusory peace and security which never came and will never come, not with the mutually antagonist Abrahamic religions, but about the years that Noah is supposed to have lived, 950 years. Would you believe in that?
I mean you're right but there are plenty more unrealistic claims that religions offer us. They sound absurd, at least to me, when you take them literally but the thing is they can be taken symbolically
 

Scolopendra

Member
That is the dilemma, what to take as literal and what to take symbolically. Many theists take advantage of this ambiguity.
I'm on the extreme and I take nothing literal when it comes to religions. However I believe that if more than 10000 religious beliefs appeared on earth ever since we have recorded human history it's clear that the religious instinct and that need of belonging and meaning is helpful to both the individual and the collective society. It probably evolved as a collateral effect of our instinct to pattern-seeking and to protect the tribe but it's still an undeniable human need to seek a religion or a philosophy. Ritualism is psychologically beneficial, if there is something I miss from my Catholic days is that feeling of connection you get when you're inside an european Cathedral, the same I get with an hike through a forest or looking at clear sky at night. You can feel these things, enjoy them yet not believe anything supernatural is behind it.
 
Last edited:

9-10ths_Penguin

1/10 Subway Stalinist
Premium Member
No, just because you created something that doesn't mean you are responsible for what it does after it is created.
Yes, it does. Being responsible for a thing includes responsibility for that thing's effects.

Let's say a car manufacturer created a car that can go 240 MPH. The car has the potential to go way over the speed limit and crash into other cars and kill people, but that car also has the potential to stay within the speed limit, drive safely, and hurt nobody.

Once that car is sold and it rolls off the car lot, the car manufacturer is not responsible for how fast the buyer drives that car.
If you sell a car to somebody knkwing that they're going to use it to kill people, then you're an accessory to those deaths.

Let's go back to that example "aiding and abetting" again:

providing information or equipment, knowing that it would be used in the commission of a crime

Aiding & Abetting a Crime - 5 Common Examples

God created humans with free will and the potential to choose to do either good or evil.
Once humans are born with free will God is not responsible for what they do with their free will, and that is why it is called free. We are free to do what we want, if we have the ability and opportunity to do it.
If God put in us the tendency to sometimes choose evil, then God is responsible for that evil and its consequences.

No, I have already established that I do believe it. See above.
God isn't responsible for what humans do because humans have free will to choose.
You agreed that being an accessory to a crime is a thing.

Think about what you just said in a general sense: do you consider it always true?

________ isn't responsible for what humans do because humans have free will to choose.

The guy who bought the murderer the murder weapon isn't responsible for what the murderer did because the murderer has free will to choose.

The person who distracted the cop from the theft isn't responsible for what the thief did because the thief has free will to choose.

Do you actually believe what you're saying as a general principle? Do you think we should be letting anyone in prison on an accessory charge free?
 

Aupmanyav

Be your own guru
God created humans with free will and the potential to choose to do either good or evil.
Once humans are born with free will God is not responsible for what they do with their free will, ..
That is a canard, Trailblazer. What a person does depends on his family, society, upbringing, education, religion, etc. No one is born with an inherent knowledge of Good and evil.
Take the case of the criminal tribes in India. Theft, robbery, murder, prostitution, drugs is routine with them. One tribe (many of them are reformed now), first kills its victims with heavy wooden clubs before robbing the house. If they do not get anything valuable in the house, it is fate, but victims have already been done with.

During their raid, they wear only underwear and apply oil on their body so that they slip out of hands of captors if anyone tries to catch them. They are fast runners and would not divulge their secrets even if they were put to extreme torture. They are trained for this. They are professionals. They have a different concept of good and evil.
kacha baniyan gang - Google Search

"At the time of Indian independence in 1947, thirteen million people in 127 communities faced search and arrest if any member of the group was found outside the prescribed area."
Criminal Tribes Act - Wikipedia
 
Last edited:

F1fan

Veteran Member
God created many things that bring suffering and God also created many things that bring joy.
The material realm of existence is a mixed bag.
Why make children suffer and die, which makes parents and family members suffer as well? You can say God created these cancers, but why? Would you deliberately cause cancer to a child? What does that achieve?

Your claims put pressure on yourself to explain all this so it makes sense, and is moral.

Why is it that atheists never mention the things God created that bring joy?
Well atheists aren't convinced any gods exist. What we see theists like yourself do is claim a God is good, but then there are facts about the world that God is responsible for (according to you) that aren't moral or good, so those have to be questioned. Theists like to claim their God does good, and ignores the the very bad things, like naturally occurring defects and diseases. You can't claim only good from God and ignore the bad.

And the joys humans feel are often what they do for themselves. Most all people just want good health and a stable environment to live in. Sickness, war, violence, poverty, etc. all cause hardships, and we can't say that any sort of supernatural brings any of the good stuff.

Can you claim that my good health is God's gift and I should be happy with God? OK. But then I should ignore how a client's 3 year old daughter developed Leukemia and died almost 2 years later? IF, as you insist, God created both how does it make sense?

It makes vastly better sense to understand the universe and life as just how nature works, and life is often a lottery, some win, some lose. Trying to assume a God behind all this can only disturb and confuse a mind.
 
Last edited:

CG Didymus

Veteran Member
I am not talking about the illusory peace and security which never came and will never come, not with the mutually antagonist Abrahamic religions, but about the years that Noah is supposed to have lived, 950 years. Would you believe in that?
But I am wondering why Baha'u'llah says that all poor Noah was trying to do was offer peace and security and those no-good people scoffed at him. I think Baha'u'llah is trying to claim that is all he is doing also.

But where did this Noah story come from? No 40 days and nights of rain... No animals... No ark? But he keeps the 950 years? I thought maybe Baha'u'llah was going by Islamic traditions, but I think that the Flood is part of their tradition also.
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
Yes, it does. Being responsible for a thing includes responsibility for that thing's effects.

If you sell a car to somebody knowing that they're going to use it to kill people, then you're an accessory to those deaths.
If you sell a car to somebody knowing that they're going to use it to kill people, then you're an accessory to those deaths, but no car salesman knows what anyone is going to do with the car they buy.
If God put in us the tendency to sometimes choose evil, then God is responsible for that evil and its consequences.
People can choose either good or evil because they have free will. No, God is not responsible for what people choose to do with their free will.
 

John53

I go leaps and bounds
Premium Member
If you sell a car to somebody knowing that they're going to use it to kill people, then you're an accessory to those deaths, but no car salesman knows what anyone is going to do with the car they buy.

People can choose either good or evil because they have free will. No, God is not responsible for what people choose to do with their free will.

Free will is the greatest religious get out of jail free card ever. It excuses everything that can't be explained.
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
Why make children suffer and die, which makes parents and family members suffer as well? You can say God created these cancers, but why? Would you deliberately cause cancer to a child? What does that achieve?

Your claims put pressure on yourself to explain all this so it makes sense, and is moral.
God did not create cancer, Cancer has many causes but God is not one of them.
God does not cause cancer in order to make children suffer and die.
Well atheists aren't convinced any gods exist. What we see theists like yourself do is claim a God is good, but then there are facts about the world that God is responsible for (according to you) that aren't moral or good, so those have to be questioned. Theists like to claim their God does good, and ignores the the very bad things, like naturally occurring defects and diseases. You can't claim only good from God and ignore the bad.
I am not a theist who claims only good from God and ignores the bad. I believe that God is responsible for both the good and the bad things that happen and that was in a thread I started recently.

Questions that believers cannot answer

All things that are not chosen by virtue of our own free are beyond our control and I believe they are predestined by God. God is responsible for both the good and the bad things that happen to us, if those things were predestined.

Man is compelled to endure the bad things that happen because God set it up that way since we live in a material world where some of the Bad things happen are beyond our control. Some of these Bad things are caused by the free will decisions of other people that affect us and some of them are simply accidents, misfortunes and diseases. These are our fate, for which God is responsible.
And the joys humans feel are often what they do for themselves. Most all people just want good health and a stable environment to live in. Sickness, war, violence, poverty, etc. all cause hardships, and we can't say that any sort of supernatural brings any of the good stuff.
For most believers, belief in God and nearness to God brings joy and peace. Belief in God has been a mixed bag for me; I do not feel near to God, but I get some solace knowing God is watching over me and will help me when I need help. Help comes in the form of other people who are there when I need them and I believe God has a part in that.

Yes, joys humans feel are what they do for themselves, but it is only because humans have free that they can choose to do these things.

When I said that God is responsible for the joys I was referring to the things that people enjoy in the natural world such as animals and nature and beautiful scenery, as well as physical enjoyments of the body, food, sex, etc.
Can you claim that my good health is God's gift and I should be happy with God? OK. But then I should ignore how a client's 3 year old daughter developed Leukemia and died almost 2 years later? IF, as you insist, God created both how does it make sense?
I cannot make any sense out of it, why some people have good health and others develop diseases and suffer and die. There are no answers to these questions. As I said in the thread I started, these are questions that believers cannot answer without resorting to a plethora of religious apologetics.
clip_image001.png


I have great health but I cannot be happy because my husband has cancer and is not long for this world. I am not going to say I believe that is fair because I don't believe that. The only way it can ever make any sense is if there is another world we go to after we die where there will be no more pain and sorrow. I firmly believe that but that does not do much to alleviate the suffering of my husband as he lies in a hospital bed, or the suffering I have to endure watching him in pain, or the suffering I will endure after he is gone. I used to be really angry at God because of all the suffering I had to endure but I finally realized the futility of such an attitude, so now I turn to God in prayer for help and I get help.

There is no escape from suffering in this material world, which is a Storehouse of Suffering, so we either go through it alone, or if we believe in God we reach out for help enduring it. When I reach out, caring compassionate people come to my aid. In spite of the fact that I have not been involved with the Baha'is in my community for many years, as soon as they found out about my husband they all rushed in wanting to help. Had they not I cannot say what I would do because I have no close friends or family to turn to.
It makes vastly better sense to understand the universe and life as just how nature works, and life is often a lottery, some win, some lose. Trying to assume a God behind all this can only disturb and confuse a mind.
You are sure right about that. It is much easier to believe that nature is nature, and like a lottery, some win, some lose, rather than having to wonder why a God would allow some to be winners and others losers. I also addressed that in my thread.

If God is just, why did God create a world in which He knew some people would suffer so much more than others, many people hardly suffering at all? How is that fair?
 

Aupmanyav

Be your own guru
God did not create cancer, Cancer has many causes but God is not one of them.
God does not cause cancer in order to make children suffer and die.


I am not a theist who claims only good from God and ignores the bad. I believe that God is responsible for both the good and the bad things that happen and that was in a thread I started recently.
As always, you are a master of posts with contradictory statements. See the first two in your post.
Then who created cancer?
 
Top