Trailblazer
Veteran Member
And you know more than Messengers do about the Nature of God?I am not waiting. I'm just saying that you're claims about the nature of God fail to hold up.
Where are you getting your information?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
And you know more than Messengers do about the Nature of God?I am not waiting. I'm just saying that you're claims about the nature of God fail to hold up.
That was a pathetic leap of desperation. Best of luck to you.Okay then, my religion might be true even though many or most people don't believe it is true.
Glad we got that squared away.
It's hearsay. It's not credible.The only way to know about God is through Scripture that comes through a Messenger of God.
That is how I know what God wants and needs.
What god?And you know more than Messengers do about the Nature of God?
Where are you getting your information?
and you know that how?But eternal life isn't a real thing, so your quote must also be irrelevant.
Why should anyone believe that you know what eternal life is?and you know that how?
Do you want to know what eternal life is?
Ask me if I care if it is credible to you.It's hearsay. It's not credible.
So by your words here God choses not to communicate with people. It could, but choses not to.I do not have to limit God and I have no such capacity....
God limits Himself by only doing what He chooses to do.
I do not care if anyone believes that I know what it is. I just offered to explain what it is, according to my religion.Why should anyone believe that you know what eternal life is?
God could not communicate to ordinary humans and be understood.So by your words here God choses not to communicate with people. It could, but choses not to.
The one true God.What god?
I am not desperate at all, I am sitting pretty with God, and that is all that matters.That was a pathetic leap of desperation. Best of luck to you.
It does not need to be a fact in order to be known. I know, but how I know is not anything you could ever understand.If it is not a fact because it is not proven, then it cannot be known either, else it would be a fact. Since a fact is something that is known OR proven to be true. Yet you have made many claims to knowledge.
Explanations include how you know what you know. Otherwise they're just tall tales.I do not care if anyone believes that I know what it is. I just offered to explain what it is, according to my religion.
I know because it was written by Abdu'l-Baha, which would be a tall tale to you.Explanations include how you know what you know. Otherwise they're just tall tales.
Due to God. You have yet to explain what problem your idea of God has with communicating with humans. Language is not that difficult to use. Children can use it. Your idea of God is incapable?God could not communicate to ordinary humans and be understood.
Just one time with a coherent explanation that makes sense. Otherwise it is just excuses as if your God doesn't;t really exist. The more you evade the more you are hiding a secret.How many times do I have to say this, 100, 1,000, 10,000, 1,000,0000 times?
God isn't talking to you either. And you could be wrong to trust Messengers. So neither of us have any real reason to think a God exists. It's not as if you know any messengers personally. All you have are texts. You must know that doubt is reasonable.Ask me if I care if it is credible to you.
God is not going to speak to you directly, you get what you get, which is what God chooses to give you.
The writer is irrelevant. I am not moved by cults of personality.I know because it was written by Abdu'l-Baha, which would be a tall tale to you.
Did you ever meet him, and ask questions? How do you know what he wrote is true, you're not a messenger? Aren't you just assuming it's true and you could be completely wrong?I know because it was written by Abdu'l-Baha, which would be a tall tale to you.
The idea of an afterlife is absurd. Not only does it have no evidence, it is inconsistent with what we know of how death and consciousness works. The claims by theists can be dismissed at face value, and that is why I say it's not true. It's a fun idea, but it's absurd.and you know that how?
I have heard what believers say it is my whole life. It's never been a coherent and rational idea.Do you want to know what eternal life is?